Crysis + 9 VMs: Core i7 and 24GB RAM
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (56) |
- Share
Kingston memory demonstrated an Intel Core i7 920 system (YouTube) this week packed with 24 GB of DDR3 of the company's ValueRAM memory. The goal of course, was to show off how stable the system can be with a total of nine virtual machines running simultaneously. The cherry on top was having Crysis run on one of the nine VMs.
The system was configured with the following hardware:
- Intel Core i7 920
- Gigabyte GA-EX58 UD5 motherboard
- Six 4 GB DDR3 modules totaling 24 GB
- Unnamed Nvidia graphics card
The demo ran through an overnight run of MemTest86+ showing the system as being rock solid. Then, Windows Vista was loaded with VMware Server and nine Vista VMs were loaded. Crysis was launched on the last VM, and seemingly performed well--although no actual gameplay was shown. At this point, we'll have to say that the loading screen for Crysis is really not a valid indication of true performance. It's a shame Kingston did not allow the game to run through.
The system at its peaked however, used just 21 GB of memory with 3 GB to spare.
Clearly this was a demonstration of Kingston's ValueRAM stability, but honestly, the same can be accomplished with memory from other manufacturers too. The cost of Kingston's ValueRAM however, is usually significantly less than "higher-end" memory.
Which memory manufacturer do you prefer? Do you care about any particular brand? Or are you game with any memory that's simply compatible?
Source : Tom's Hardware US
- The old AM3 or 1366 chestnut - which to build around? [CPU & Components]
- My first computer build, suggestions/approval? [Homebuilt Systems]
- 1st time OC'er , i7 920 [Overclocking]
- Core i7 920 (2 cores/4 threads) VS. Core i7 920 (4 cores/4 threads) [CPU & Components]
- New to custom systems [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Actual Temps on a AMD Athlon 64 x2 7750?
- Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 OR Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 ?
- I need your opinion....
- Please help me on choosing a CPU for my gaming rig
- E6400 vs. AMD Phenom 8750 Triple Core
- Do I really need to overclock?..truthfully
- Trouble Overclocking Intel Q9300
- 780i SLI or x48 CFx? Gaming at 1920x
- RUNNING CRYSIS
- Help in picking right mobo+cpu for OC'ing on a budget.
- Kingston Hyper X 1066mhz DDR 2 ram causing issues
- Memory For new Q6600 based system
- Help choosing 680i motherboard
- Should I even bother upgrading to 4gb?
Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $310.00 STAPLES More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $169.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X2 550 Dual Core Processor... | $90.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7-860 Quad Core Processor... | $279.99 Newegg.com More info |
AES-NI Performance Analyzed; Limited To 32nm Core i5 CPUs
Starting with its dual-core Clarkfield-based Core i5 processors, Intel is introducing AES New Instructions to its architecture. We've already seen great benefits from a number of synthetic benchmarks, but what are the real-life advantages of this tech? Read More
-
Phenom II X2 555 Vs. Pentium G6950: New Budget Dual-Core Titans
AMD is launching a broad spectrum of new CPUs today. And while most are simple speed bumps, today we're pitting its fastest dual-core model, the Phenom II X2 555 Black Edition, against Intel's LGA 1156-based Pentium G6950 to see who rules for under $100. Read More
-
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: January '10
December was a somewhat slow month in the CPU world, but January promises to inject a great deal of excitement into the sector with some major announcements. We discuss some of the potential changes and make our recommendations in this month's article. Read More
All performance charts
- Intel to Start Shipping P55 Motherboards in July
- Nvidia: Expect x86 Processor in 2-3 Years
- Intel Designs a Phone Based on Atom
- 24gb ddr3 ram
- windows vista loading screen
- 24gb ddr3
- why windows vista 4 gb memory not shows
- motherboard 24gb
- 24 gb ddr3 ram
- motherboard 24gb ram
- 24 gb ddr3
- why have 24 gb memory
- intel i7 24gb ram
- intel core i7 for server
- i7 motherboard 24gb
- gigabyte ud5 motherboard
- kingston valueram ddr3 review
- hardware for i7









Epic.
Spam.
Wow that a lot of memory.
I have had no problems with Crucial - either their Ballistix line or otherwise. And they're quite a bit less expensive than Kingston.
I prefer Patriot
Would have been impressive eight virtual machines running with eight separate instances of Crysis running on all of the virtual machines and actual simultaneous game play, possible using four GTX 295 (Obviously not in SLI).
For value G.Skill or Patriot
I wanted to see some benchies. What a pointless article. I don't care what brand the RAM is so long as it is reliable. I find Kingston to be the most compatible and reliable but Gskill and OCZ have been great so far too.
So a core i7 and 24 gigs of ram just to run 9 copies of vista at idle, doing nothing. And one copy of crysis at the into screen doing nothing.
This is suppose to be impressive how? Ok they found a way to eat 24 gigs of ram....doing nothing.....leet?
Patriot, for several reasons, but Made in the US is always nice to see on Tech Stuff.
Of course they didn't run the game. It is not "easy" to use powerfull GPUs on VMware, you got to reserve it.
And much less 8 Instances of it running full power. I can't imagine the mess it would be. Not to talk about keyboards,mouse, soundcards, ad nauseam.
Pretty great it "executed" crysis on a "emulated" GPU.
Don't care. I need large quantities and who ever provides the high qantity and with some descent speed for a price I can afford gets the cash.
LOL!!! that is sooo awesome! I personally am a G.Skill fanboy...they have really good prices and great quality ram
Corsair
I didn't realize VMWare provided direct-access to the graphics card.
Stupid Microsoft VirtualPC provides a fake Intel graphics adapter with no connection to the underlying DirectX hardware. Of course, it doesn't support USB either, which makes it a wholly worthless piece of crap. No wonder its now free.
Mushkin memory all the way.
I have two kits of Corsair XMS2 DDR2 memory, both running flawlessly.
The first one I bought was 2 x 1 GB, running at 667 Mhz with 4-4-4-12 timings at 1.9, absolutely stable and barely warm (curiously it didn't like running at the stock JEDEC standard of 667 at 5-5-5-15 at 1.8v - it ran flawlessly but it produced a lot more heat than at 1.9v 4-4-412 timings. It's weird, but it's true)
The second is a 2 x 2GB XMS2 DHX running at 800Mhz with stock timings of 5-5-5-18 and stock voltage of 1.8v.
Both of them were being sold for very competitive prices at this quality.
Vista doing nothing = doing too much
I've had several pairs of Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500 2.2V modules fail. I've had a pair of Corsair TwinX DDR 400 fail. Both were replaced under warranty and I don't hold a grudge against either brand. But having experienced data corruption with faulty RAM I went with 8GB of Kingston KVR800D2E5K2/4G ECC memory in my Asus M3A78-EM. With a large amount of memory the chance of a bad or flipped bit is rather high and the performance penalty is minor. Unregistered ECC modules are not much more than non-ECC. The Kingstons were only $45/pair.
Where can you even get 4GB DDR3 Modules?
Kingston and Corsair FTW!!
I've had failures with all kinds of ram and some good modules too. Right now OCZ gets my money. Quality product!
Gotta love mushkin though, produced in Colorado, USA. I buy enough electronics from China.
Mushkin memory all the way.
+1
I'm with voodooaddict. Where can you get 4 GB DDR3 DIMMs?
different types of ram matter less I find!
I only find it strange to run 24GB of DDR3 RAM without a passive cooling blade
Vista doing nothing = doing too much
lol golden
Crucial. Preferably Ballistix or Ballistix Tracers. My 8 GB of DDR2-800 Ballistix Tracers run fast and tight without raising voltages which gives me confidence.
Oh, and they're made in Idaho!
Buy American!
different types of ram matter less I find!I only find it strange to run 24GB of DDR3 RAM without a passive cooling blade
That's one of the points they're trying to prove I believe. They don't need a cooling blade.
They aren't called "cooling blades", they are called "heatsinks"
Heatspreaders actually, but hey, who cares?
Me! jk