Ads
Ads
All about CPU
 Latest CPU articles
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE: Same Speed, Less Power

AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE: Same Speed, Less Power
Today AMD is introducing a revision of its flagship Phenom II X4 965 processor rated at 125W, replacing the 140W part, as well as a new 3.1 version of its Overdrive overclocking software. We take a quick look at both to see what advantages they offer. Read More

  • Overclocked On Air: Intel's Core i5-750
    Intel's new quad-core i5 and i7 CPUs for LGA 1156 deliver plenty of performance and impressive efficiency. But how far can they be overclocked? We take the entry-level model Core i5-750 as far as it'll go with a modest air cooler and benchmark it. Read More
All CPU articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
Ads

Sponsored links

Crysis + 9 VMs: Core i7 and 24GB RAM

Next news
3:31 PM - March 5, 2009 by Tuan Nguyen

Kingston memory demonstrated an Intel Core i7 920 system (YouTube) this week packed with 24 GB of DDR3 of the company's ValueRAM memory. The goal of course, was to show off how stable the system can be with a total of nine virtual machines running simultaneously. The cherry on top was having Crysis run on one of the nine VMs.

The system was configured with the following hardware:

- Intel Core i7 920
- Gigabyte GA-EX58 UD5 motherboard
- Six 4 GB DDR3 modules totaling 24 GB
- Unnamed Nvidia graphics card

The demo ran through an overnight run of MemTest86+ showing the system as being rock solid. Then, Windows Vista was loaded with VMware Server and nine Vista VMs were loaded. Crysis was launched on the last VM, and seemingly performed well--although no actual gameplay was shown. At this point, we'll have to say that the loading screen for Crysis is really not a valid indication of true performance. It's a shame Kingston did not allow the game to run through.

The system at its peaked however, used just 21 GB of memory with 3 GB to spare.

Clearly this was a demonstration of Kingston's ValueRAM stability, but honestly, the same can be accomplished with memory from other manufacturers too. The cost of Kingston's ValueRAM however, is usually significantly less than "higher-end" memory.

Which memory manufacturer do you prefer? Do you care about any particular brand? Or are you game with any memory that's simply compatible?

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
tipoo 03/05/2009 9:51 PM
Hide
-0+

Epic.

StupidRabbit 03/05/2009 10:00 PM
Hide
-0+

Spam.

Tekkamanraiden 03/05/2009 10:00 PM
Hide
-0+

Wow that a lot of memory.

etrnl_frost 03/05/2009 10:08 PM
Hide
-0+

I have had no problems with Crucial - either their Ballistix line or otherwise. And they're quite a bit less expensive than Kingston.

08nwsula 03/05/2009 10:08 PM
Hide
-0+

I prefer Patriot

mrubermonkey 03/05/2009 10:14 PM
Hide
-3+

Would have been impressive eight virtual machines running with eight separate instances of Crysis running on all of the virtual machines and actual simultaneous game play, possible using four GTX 295 (Obviously not in SLI).

ckthecerealkiller 03/05/2009 10:18 PM
Hide
-1+

For value G.Skill or Patriot

bone squat 03/05/2009 10:31 PM
Show
Anonymous 03/05/2009 10:33 PM
Hide
-3+

So a core i7 and 24 gigs of ram just to run 9 copies of vista at idle, doing nothing. And one copy of crysis at the into screen doing nothing.

This is suppose to be impressive how? Ok they found a way to eat 24 gigs of ram....doing nothing.....leet?

waikano 03/05/2009 10:33 PM
Hide
-2+

Patriot, for several reasons, but Made in the US is always nice to see on Tech Stuff.

radnor 03/05/2009 10:38 PM
Hide
-0+

Of course they didn't run the game. It is not "easy" to use powerfull GPUs on VMware, you got to reserve it.

And much less 8 Instances of it running full power. I can't imagine the mess it would be. Not to talk about keyboards,mouse, soundcards, ad nauseam.

Pretty great it "executed" crysis on a "emulated" GPU.

A Stoner 03/05/2009 10:43 PM
Hide
-0+

Don't care. I need large quantities and who ever provides the high qantity and with some descent speed for a price I can afford gets the cash.

Ahslan 03/05/2009 11:00 PM
Hide
-0+

LOL!!! that is sooo awesome! I personally am a G.Skill fanboy...they have really good prices and great quality ram

The Schnoz 03/05/2009 11:04 PM
Hide
-0+

Corsair

hellwig 03/05/2009 11:08 PM
Hide
-4+

I didn't realize VMWare provided direct-access to the graphics card.

Stupid Microsoft VirtualPC provides a fake Intel graphics adapter with no connection to the underlying DirectX hardware. Of course, it doesn't support USB either, which makes it a wholly worthless piece of crap. No wonder its now free.

Daguava 03/05/2009 11:19 PM
Hide
-5+

Mushkin memory all the way.

tpi2007 03/05/2009 11:22 PM
Hide
-0+

I have two kits of Corsair XMS2 DDR2 memory, both running flawlessly.

The first one I bought was 2 x 1 GB, running at 667 Mhz with 4-4-4-12 timings at 1.9, absolutely stable and barely warm (curiously it didn't like running at the stock JEDEC standard of 667 at 5-5-5-15 at 1.8v - it ran flawlessly but it produced a lot more heat than at 1.9v 4-4-412 timings. It's weird, but it's true)

The second is a 2 x 2GB XMS2 DHX running at 800Mhz with stock timings of 5-5-5-18 and stock voltage of 1.8v.

Both of them were being sold for very competitive prices at this quality.

jawshoeaw 03/05/2009 11:50 PM
Hide
--2+

Vista doing nothing = doing too much

jhansonxi 03/05/2009 11:51 PM
Hide
-2+

I've had several pairs of Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500 2.2V modules fail. I've had a pair of Corsair TwinX DDR 400 fail. Both were replaced under warranty and I don't hold a grudge against either brand. But having experienced data corruption with faulty RAM I went with 8GB of Kingston KVR800D2E5K2/4G ECC memory in my Asus M3A78-EM. With a large amount of memory the chance of a bad or flipped bit is rather high and the performance penalty is minor. Unregistered ECC modules are not much more than non-ECC. The Kingstons were only $45/pair.

voodooaddict 03/06/2009 12:16 PM
Hide
-0+

Where can you even get 4GB DDR3 Modules?

Raidur 03/06/2009 1:54 AM
Hide
-2+

Kingston and Corsair FTW!!

buzznut 03/06/2009 2:04 AM
Hide
-1+

I've had failures with all kinds of ram and some good modules too. Right now OCZ gets my money. Quality product!
Gotta love mushkin though, produced in Colorado, USA. I buy enough electronics from China.

hairycat101 03/06/2009 2:09 AM
Hide
-1+

Daguava :
Mushkin memory all the way.


+1

killerb255 03/06/2009 2:42 AM
Hide
-0+

I'm with voodooaddict. Where can you get 4 GB DDR3 DIMMs?

ProDigit80 03/06/2009 2:55 AM
Hide
--3+

different types of ram matter less I find!
I only find it strange to run 24GB of DDR3 RAM without a passive cooling blade

Flameout 03/06/2009 3:24 AM
Hide
--1+

jawshoeaw :
Vista doing nothing = doing too much


lol golden

caffeinecarl 03/06/2009 5:11 AM
Hide
-1+

Crucial. Preferably Ballistix or Ballistix Tracers. My 8 GB of DDR2-800 Ballistix Tracers run fast and tight without raising voltages which gives me confidence.

Oh, and they're made in Idaho!
Buy American!

joseph85 03/06/2009 5:16 AM
Hide
-1+

ProDigit80 :
different types of ram matter less I find!I only find it strange to run 24GB of DDR3 RAM without a passive cooling blade


That's one of the points they're trying to prove I believe. They don't need a cooling blade.

royalcrown 03/06/2009 6:19 AM
Hide
-0+

They aren't called "cooling blades", they are called "heatsinks"

Roffey123 03/06/2009 7:08 AM
Hide
-2+

Heatspreaders actually, but hey, who cares?

BaBa BoeY 03/06/2009 8:18 AM
Hide
-0+

Me! jk :D


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links