Best offers
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $549.99 Dell Home More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $214.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $109.99 Best Buy More info |
|
Radeon HD 5770 Video Card (1GB,... | $179.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Radeon HD 4890 Cyclone OC Video Card... | $209.99 Directron More info |
- windows h.264 codec
- windows xp h.264 codec
- vista h.264
- nvidia geforce 8500 gt benchmark
- vista cpu upgrade
- h.264 codec for windows vista
- nvidia 8500 gt benchmark
- avivo hd codec
- gt 8600 drivers
- play vc1
- windows xp codec h264
- nvidia cpu usage
- geforce 8500 gt benchmark
- how to get your supporting video card to decode h264
- windows xp h.264
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
More Mindless Violence
Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Sponsored links
However, the Geforce 8800 GTX and 8600 GTS seem to have lowered CPU utilization significantly. It looks like the CPU has to work about 20% less with these cards. Of course, the VC-1 isn't particularly difficult to decode and even without acceleration the e4300 CPU is performing well.
As a point of interest, the Geforce 8500 GT seems to require a bit more resources to play VC-1 video than all of the other cards. This is a strange result and we're not quite sure what to make of it.
With Windows XP results analyzed, let's see if anything changes when we run the same test in Windows Vista:
Here we see almost carbon copy results of the test in Windows XP, with the notable difference that the Geforce 8500 GT is now providing the same decoding prowess as the 8800 GTX and 8600 GTS.
In any case, it seems that VC-1 decoding favors the Geforce line at this point (save the anomaly with the 8500 GT in Windows XP). But as we said, the VC-1 codec doesn't really tax new low-end CPUs like the e4300. Let's see if the situation changes when we view an HD video encoded with the resource-hogging H.264 codec:
The H.264 Codec in Windows XP and Windows Vista:


First off, take note of the CPU utilization for non-accelerated H.264 video: it's much higher than VC-1 is, hovering at about 75% on our e4300 test CPU. That's pretty high, and effectively tells us that H.264 video will probably skip on older CPUs, many of which are still in plenty of people's systems.
In Windows XP, we see some interesting reversals. The Radeon X1900 XTX and HD 2900 XT are now assisting in the decode process, taking a sizable load off the CPU. The Geforce 8800 GTX is also assisting video decoding, with results essentially identical to that of the Radeon cards.
The Nvidia representatives said the 8500/8600 drivers are not yet decoding H.264 video in Windows XP, and here is the proof. In fact, these video cards actually seem to require additional CPU resources to play HD video. Quite puzzling. Let's see what happens when we move to Windows Vista:
Impressive! The new 8500 GT and 8600 GTS really show their stuff, lowering CPU utilization from the 80% territory down to 20% territory. This is a really compelling result and goes to show that, yes, these new Geforce cards really should make HD video a reality on old systems. The only problem: at this point, you need that old machine to be running Windows Vista to see the benefits. I don't know if people with old single-core CPUs are going to upgrade to Vista. Hopefully, Nvidia will soon release new Windows XP drivers for the 8500/8600 cards that will expose this cool video decoding prowess.
Ironically, folks with older CPUs will probably run Windows XP in the meantime, and in that case the Radeon X1900/HD 2900 and Geforce 8800 GTX will produce more effective video acceleration. But I'm not going to advise owners of old platforms to get a high-end graphics card. If you have an older single-core CPU and want to watch HD DVD/Blu-ray disks, your best bet is to wait until Nvidia enables 8500/8600 decode acceleration in Windows XP.
- hd Graphic card for playing back HD DVD and BD. [Graphic & Displays]
- GF8600 or HD2600: consensus? [Home Theatre]
- Consensus on Purevideo vs. AVIVO [Graphic & Displays]
- ATI Avivo and Nvidia's Purevideo Dissected [Graphic & Displays]
- AVIVO vs. Purevideo HD: What You Need to Know about High-Definition Video [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Video card settings
- Nehalem SuperPi score: this time it's real!
- amd vs intel
- Athlon X2 Compatibilty
- What is the best agp board right now?
- First Time Builder - Good System or Overkill ???
- Advice on building a Vista machine? (non-gaming)
- Video Editing System on the cheap
- HTPC Build Suggestions
- But I don't wanna build another one (whine alert)
- need help with blu-ray 4 pc
- The Short List: the Best Gaming Videocards for the money
- Video Capture: Available On AMD, Sometimes On Nvidia
- Video card for the non-gamer?
Related news
- Nvidia enables HD DVD and Blu-ray movies with PureVideo HD technology
- Nvidia's PureVideo promises home theater video quality for the PC
- ATI launches Avivo graphics platform for home entertainment
- Cyberlink first out the gate to support Xbox 360 HD DVD drive on the PC
- Ati includes Avivo video converter with new Catalyst 6.3 drivers





