Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Results: DivX And WMV, No Hardware Acceleration

Updated: Tuning C'n'Q: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 2
By

This scenario will likely apply to many of us watching video on our PCs without hardware-accelerated video. It’s a bit more interesting to look at because, with this scenario, we will be able to see power consumption when the processor is fully loaded.

Interestingly, DivX uses fewer resources for playback than WMV. A multi-thread codec is able to spread the task more evenly between available cores. In effect, this means having more cores (in lower p-states) leads to more savings than having fewer cores (in intermediary p-states). Compare the DivX and WMV graphs. With WMV, all processors are unable to use lower p-states (and thus unable to save power) compared to DivX.

That doesn’t mean DivX is not resource-intensive. Just look at the Athlon X2 7750 and Phenom II X3 710. These processor lack the performance to play our DivX test video clip while in their lowest p-states, forcing them to use the higher/highest p-state. You can keep this from happening by customizing the multiplier used by the lower/lowest p-states as demonstrated in Part 1.

React To This Article