Intel IPO delivers better gaming performance than 200S Boost in user benchmarks

Core Ultra 200S CPU
(Image credit: Intel)

Intel has recently introduced two performance-boosting features for its Core Ultra 200S (codenamed Arrow Lake) processors, which rank among the best CPUs. While IPO (Intel Performance Optimizations) and 200S Boost share the same objective, one BiliBili user's tests (via Uniko's Hardware) seemingly show that IPO delivers a higher gaming performance uplift.

The user performed the tests with a Core Ultra 7 265K, DDR5-8000 memory, and a GeForce RTX 5090D. They benchmarked IPO and 200S Boost across seven games with different quality settings at 2160p (3840 x 2160) and DLSS activated when applicable.

The Core Ultra 7 265K was a part of three configurations. The XMP configuration enables XMP to get the memory up to DDR5-8000 with no changes to the processor. The 200S Boost configuration increases the Die-to-Die (D2D) communication fabric from the default 2.1 GHz to 3.2 GHz and the Next Generation Uncore (NGU) fabric from 2.6 GHz to 3.2 GHz.

On the other hand, the IPO configuration makes several changes to the processor. For starters, it increases the P-core and E-core clocks to 5.4 GHz and 4.9 GHz, respectively, from the default 5.2 GHz and 4.9 GHz. While the 200S Boost doesn't touch the Ring (3.8 GHz), IPO overclocks it to 4 GHz. These adjustments limit IPO from pushing the D2D and NGU as hard as IPO. As a result, the IPO only dials in at 3.1 GHz for the D2D and NGU. The memory, however, is tuned to DDR5-8400 with optimized timings.

Intel IPO vs. Intel 200S Boost Gaming Performance

Swipe to scroll horizontally

Games

Default XMP 8000

Intel 200S Boost

Intel IPO

Forza Horizon 5

263 / 197

269 / 197

274 / 198

Cyberpunk 2077

288 / 260

289 / 261

297 / 277

Total War: Warhammer III

103 / 87

104 / 82

110 / 89

Black Myth: Wukong

200 / 101

202 / 102

206 / 104

Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Siege

484 / 403

483 / 396

491 / 405

Counter-Strike 2

653 / 205

661 / 217

770 / 260

Watch Dogs: Legion

146 / 111

158 / 116

170 / 127

IPO pumped out 2% higher average frame rates than 200S Boost in Forza Horizon 5 and less than 1% higher 1% Lows. In Cyberpunk 2077, however, IPO exhibited 3% higher average frame rates and 6% higher 1% Lows. IPO also excelled in Total War: Warhammer III, delivering 6% better average frame rates and 9% better 1% Lows than 200S Boost.

With Black Myth: Wukong, IPO only showed 2% higher average frame rates and 1% Lows than 200S Boost. The tests showed similar results in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Siege.

Counter-Strike 2, tested at 1080p (1920 x 1080), gained the most from Intel's performance enhancements. It is not unexpected, as Counter-Strike 2 is very processor-intensive. IPO boasted 16% higher average frame rates and 20% better 1% Lows. Meanwhile, IPO outperformed 200S Boost in Watch Dogs: Legion with 8% and 9% improved average frame rates and 1% Lows, respectively.

Since their introduction, Intel's Core Ultra 200S processors have exhibited performance challenges, prompting Intel to develop various optimizations to enhance their competitiveness against AMD's Ryzen 9000 (codename Granite Ridge) processors. Nonetheless, user-provided benchmarks indicate a comparative advantage for Intel IPO over 200S Boost. It's understandable since the former makes more changes to the processor's parameters and overclocks compatible DDR5-8000 memory kits to DDR5-8400.

As the results have shown, the performance margins between Intel's IPO and 200S Boost are small unless you're playing a processor-intensive game. For instance, running Cyberpunk 2077 at 289 FPS or 297 FPS may not be discernible to the human eye if you don't have a frame rate monitoring software on screen.

Intel's 200S Boost is available to all Arrow Lake processor owners via a motherboard firmware update. Intel IPO, on the other hand, is currently only available in China.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Zhiye Liu
News Editor and Memory Reviewer

Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.

  • BladePocok
    Try these results again in the lower segment, not everything is about the high-end top top performance.
    Reply
  • truerock
    I installed Gigabyte BIOS version 17c on Tuesday.

    I think I'm running the equivalent to IPO and "Intel 200S Boost" at the same time.

    I'm using:
    VENGEANCE® 48GB (2x24GB) DDR5 CUDIMM 9200
    on a
    Gigabyte Z890 AORUS MASTER LGA 1851 Motherboard
    with a
    Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Processor

    When I turned on "Intel 200S Boost" it set "XMP 1" to DDR5-9200 44-56-56-148-1.450
    and an "Advanced Memory Setting" of 9200

    Before I just had an "Advanced Memory Setting" of 5600

    Note: none of that has any reference to CU-DIMM - which I think is odd.
    Perhaps Intel has done no "200S Boost" benchmarking with CU-DIMMS?

    My PC boots in roughly 34 seconds instead of 36 seconds.

    HWinfo says "Current Memory Clock" is 4000.0 MHz, which I think is the maximum Intel will let memory run with "Intel 200S Boost". Which I too bad for me with my DDR5-9200 CU-DIMMS.

    Also, when I turn on "Intel 200S Boost", it turns off the 2 highest "Gigabyte PerfDrive" (preset BIOS settings) choices - but, it allowed me to go from "Performance" to "Extreme".
    So, I selected "Extreme" even though it gives a warning when you do that.

    So, I think I'm running the equivalent to IPO and "Intel 200S Boost" at the same time.
    Reply
  • thestryker
    IPO is also overclocking the CPU cores so it shouldn't be of any surprise that it's faster. This is also seemingly an OEM only setting which leads me to believe that not all CPUs are going to be capable of IPO whereas 200S Boost they are.
    truerock said:
    Also, when I turn on "Intel 200S Boost", it turns off the 2 highest "Gigabyte PerfDrive" (preset BIOS settings) choices - but, it allowed me to go from "Performance" to "Extreme".
    So, I selected "Extreme" even though it gives a warning when you do that.
    Unless that Gigabyte setting increases CPU and ring bus clock speed it's just a power setting that will give more headroom to meet stock clocks.
    truerock said:
    HWinfo says "Current Memory Clock" is 4000.0 MHz, which I think is the maximum Intel will let memory run with "Intel 200S Boost". Which I too bad for me with my DDR5-9200 CU-DIMMS.
    It is so if your system is stable with them you'd likely be better off using the XMP profile though it will raise voltage to 1.45.
    Reply
  • truerock
    thestryker said:
    IPO is also overclocking the CPU cores so it shouldn't be of any surprise that it's faster. This is also seemingly an OEM only setting which leads me to believe that not all CPUs are going to be capable of IPO whereas 200S Boost they are.

    Unless that Gigabyte setting increases CPU and ring bus clock speed it's just a power setting that will give more headroom to meet stock clocks.

    It is so if your system is stable with them you'd likely be better off using the XMP profile though it will raise voltage to 1.45.
    If I run "Intel 200S Boost" can I also run Intel Performance Optimizations?

    Yes! Intel Performance Optimizations (IPO) and Intel 200S Boost are compatible features designed to enhance CPU performance.
    IPO focuses on P-core and E-core clock speeds, while 200S Boost optimizes memory and fabric frequencies.
    If you're using an Intel Core Ultra 200S K-series processor with a Z890 motherboard, you can enable both features in the BIOS to maximize gaming performance.
    Just make sure your system meets the necessary hardware requirements!

    So, did I misunderstand the Tom's article?
    To me it seemed Toms was saying you had to run one or the other.
    My question was what happens when you run them at the same time?
    Reply