Best offers
|
My Passport Essential 500GB Portable... | $129.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Caviar Black 1TB Hard Drive (Serial... | $99.99 Dell Small Business More info |
|
My Book Essential Edition External... | $148.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
X25-M Gen2 160GB 2.5" Solid State... | $509.95 PC Connection More info |
|
My Passport Essential Portable 320GB... | $134.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
- sata hot swap enclosure
- external raid storage
- degraded raid array
- external raid enclosure
- direct attached storage
- pci express raid card
- pci express raid controller
- external raid controller
- raid 5 with hot swap
- hot swap enclosure
- sas hard drive enclosure
- raid 10 with hot swap
- sata drive bay hot swap
- raid throughput
- raid storage solutions
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (4) |
- Share
The iRAIDer by Accusys consists of a x4 PCI Express RAID controller card with a single eSATA port based on MiniSAS cabling (SFF-8088), and the storage appliance that accepts up to four 3.5” SATA hard drives.
Sequential read and write performance was very consistent in all of our benchmarks. We used four WD1500 Raptor hard drives, since these provide high throughput and excellent access times. The solution provided 310 MB/s read and roughly 300 MB/s write throughput in RAID 0, 160 MB/s read and 140 MB/s write in RAID 10 and 230 MB/s both read and write performance when running a RAID 5 array with four hard drives. The iRAIDer doesn’t even drop in performance if it has to operate with a degraded RAID 5 array (where one drive is broken or removed). However, the AMCC solution provided much higher I/O performance, making the Accusys device the better choice for desktop and streaming applications.
We received a test sample with a 4-bay chassis, but there are two other options on the iRAIDer data sheet. You can also choose between a package that includes two 4-bay chassis and a package with a single drive enclosure that accepts up to eight hard drives. Both options come with an upgraded version of the Accusys RAID controller card, which offers two eSATA ports with MiniSAS cabling instead of only one.
The iRAIDer comes with a three-year factory warranty, which we consider the minimum period for a professional or semi-professional product.
Hot Swap Bays
The iRAIDer storage box is very solid, but it isn’t quiet. We found that the fan isn’t temperature controlled and always runs at a relatively high speed, making a fair amount of noise. We don’t recommend the iRAIDer for desktop or workstation PCs if you insist on a quiet working environment.
The drives have to be installed into removable frames made of aluminum, which have a plastic front cover and handle. A little lock allows you to prevent unauthorized removal of the drives. The entire mechanism is solid and looks reliable.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- E8500 vs X2 7750
- Need a server for data processing
- Dual Power Supply Setup
- Q6600 as a server, is it a good decision?
- Decided not to go ultra cheap, will this PS/Case work?
- From 680i P5N32-E SLI to790i Striker II Extreme
- RAID 0 on my P5W DH Deluxe, need some pointers
- Need Help! on new system build...
- Ready for my next upgrade please help!
- Separate PSU for additional fans?
- Which Asus MB for Q6600?
- Is my boared faulty?? and what boared should I get if so
- Asus p5W DeLuxe Intel 2 Quad 8Gb bios reports 3.2
- GA-G33M-S2H - blue screen when AHCI enabled
Related news
- Maxtos intros 500 GByte external network and media storage
- Oxford Semi intros SATA bridge chips for external storage
- CES 2007: Toshiba to debut external USB hard drive
- CeBIT 2008: Buffalo Unveils external Blu-ray/HD-DVD drive and HDTV Thin Client
- CES 2007: Asus shows off external graphics for notebooks











How does this compare to a DIY Linux Software RAID? Price? Performance? Reliability?
Unlike a hardware solution, if the controller card dies, you can forget about getting your data back since there is no "Standard" for RAID. On Linux you could just put the drives into another PC, as the meta-data for software RAID on Linux is not going to change across different versions of Linux.
Thanks for the article - you have convinced me not to even consider either of these.
RAID 10 should be faster than any individual drive for reads and writes, and it should also be faster than RAID 5.
Something is wrong here - either with the hardware or the tests.
Actually performance isn't capped at 1 cable. There are a number of solutions that have multiple connections using iscsi, some even route between the connections dynamically on the server side and you can bond the ethernet connections on the client side to achieve performance maxing out the quantity of connections on the client machine. Of the ones that we tested (day job) there were only a few that met performance needs. All the arrays max the cable(s) out with straight read/write, but the performance on a number of array's drops drastically when you staring hitting them with more clients (20+) for read/write scenarios. Of course, these solutions are only really useful if you have, say, 100K (or more. Alot more in some cases) lying around.
It's a crying shame that storage "solution" providers (and Tom's Hardware) don't look at the needs of the laptop marketshare. This would be just what I need, but the controller cards are deal-breakers.