Shop for All
|
Prestige Portable 500GB 2.5" Hard... |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$121.70 |
|
Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB Hard Drive | $139.99 | |
|
My Passport Essential Black... | $129.99 | |
|
Elements External 1 TB Hard Drive | $109.00 | |
|
My Passport Essential 500GB... | $149.99 |
All performance charts
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
action :
Line Rider Beta 2
The new version of Line Rider! With the pencil tool make a line from the left top to the right bottom. use the hand to move the line if needed and...
|
Sponsored links
External RAID Storage
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (4) |
- Share
Table of contents
- 1 – Direct Attached Storage is not Dead Yet
- 2 – Accusys iRAIDer
- 3 – Controller ACS-61020CB
- 4 – AMCC/3Ware Sidecar
- 5 – Hot Swap Bays
- 6 – Controller Comparison Table
- 7 – Test Setup
- 8 – Benchmark Results
- 9 – RAID 1+0 Transfer Rates
- 10 – RAID 0 I/O Performance
- 11 – RAID 10 I/O Performance
- 12 – RAID 5 I/O Performance
- 13 – Conclusion
- 14 – More on this topic
There are many ways of attaching storage solutions to a PC system. While direct attached storage based on internal controllers and hard drives dominated the PC world in the 1990s, flexible external storage solutions are gradually taking over. Thanks to a broad selection of interfaces such as eSATA, SAS, Fibre Channel and Ethernet, storage solutions have moved out of the PC, and can increasingly be found in the form of powerful NAS solutions, DAS boxes and SAN appliances. However, flexible networked storage solutions are still rather expensive, and can mostly be found only for rack installation. Also, few of them provide the throughput or I/O performance required by performance critical applications. We looked at two direct attached, entry-level RAID storage systems that aim to bridge the gap between inflexible high-speed internal storage and flexible, but expensive networked storage solutions.
While networked storage solutions based on Network Attached Storage (NAS) or Storage Area Networks (SAN) over Ethernet clearly are our favorite choice for near-line and offline storage, they often cannot satisfy the demands of online and high-performance storage applications. Offline storage describes backup storage, archiving or secondary storage areas, which do not need to deliver high performance. Near-line storage is characterized by frequent access — such as daily backup or fileservers — although near-line storage doesn’t have to provide maximum performance either. That is needed most by online storage, which refers to high-performance RAID arrays and storage solutions to power databases, your operating system or temporary files such as huge video streams.
Like SCSI hardware did a few years ago, SAS controllers and storage appliances fulfill all the requirements of online storage today. However, SAS hardware comes with the price premium of professional products. SAS controllers using SATA hard drives are sometimes an option, but you still have to invest in a powerful storage controller and appropriate storage appliances. NAS devices and SAN/iSCSI storage are positioned on the other end. There are certainly affordable solutions, but these don’t really satisfy higher performance requirements. Both NAS and iSCSI are limited by the network performance (roughly 110 MB/s for Gigabyte Ethernet); interface options such as Fibre Channel are too expensive.
This is where Accusys’s iRAIDer and AMCC’s 3Ware Sidecar make their appearance. Both consist of a PCI Express RAID controller card, which you’ll have to install into your host PC, and an external storage box for up to four SATA hard drives.
- Preview: The New Tom's Hardware [Bestofmedia's Site Feedback]
- HTPC storage and backup - NAS, Internal, External, or RAID? [Storage]
- I7 Computer build for video editing Premiere CS4 [CPU & Components]
- RAID 0 + 5 [Storage]
- System for editing HD in Adobe Premiere [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- E8500 vs X2 7750
- Need a server for data processing
- Dual Power Supply Setup
- Q6600 as a server, is it a good decision?
- Decided not to go ultra cheap, will this PS/Case work?
- From 680i P5N32-E SLI to790i Striker II Extreme
- RAID 0 on my P5W DH Deluxe, need some pointers
- Need Help! on new system build...
- Ready for my next upgrade please help!
- Separate PSU for additional fans?
- Which Asus MB for Q6600?
- Is my boared faulty?? and what boared should I get if so
- Asus p5W DeLuxe Intel 2 Quad 8Gb bios reports 3.2
- GA-G33M-S2H - blue screen when AHCI enabled
Related news
- Maxtos intros 500 GByte external network and media storage
- Oxford Semi intros SATA bridge chips for external storage
- CES 2007: Toshiba to debut external USB hard drive
- CeBIT 2008: Buffalo Unveils external Blu-ray/HD-DVD drive and HDTV Thin Client
- CES 2007: Asus shows off external graphics for notebooks


How does this compare to a DIY Linux Software RAID? Price? Performance? Reliability?
Unlike a hardware solution, if the controller card dies, you can forget about getting your data back since there is no "Standard" for RAID. On Linux you could just put the drives into another PC, as the meta-data for software RAID on Linux is not going to change across different versions of Linux.
Thanks for the article - you have convinced me not to even consider either of these.
RAID 10 should be faster than any individual drive for reads and writes, and it should also be faster than RAID 5.
Something is wrong here - either with the hardware or the tests.
Actually performance isn't capped at 1 cable. There are a number of solutions that have multiple connections using iscsi, some even route between the connections dynamically on the server side and you can bond the ethernet connections on the client side to achieve performance maxing out the quantity of connections on the client machine. Of the ones that we tested (day job) there were only a few that met performance needs. All the arrays max the cable(s) out with straight read/write, but the performance on a number of array's drops drastically when you staring hitting them with more clients (20+) for read/write scenarios. Of course, these solutions are only really useful if you have, say, 100K (or more. Alot more in some cases) lying around.
It's a crying shame that storage "solution" providers (and Tom's Hardware) don't look at the needs of the laptop marketshare. This would be just what I need, but the controller cards are deal-breakers.