Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Performance Per Dollar

Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: November 2014
By

In an effort to further illustrate the performance you get for every dollar spent on our recommendations, we chart out the hierarchy of processors in our column. The green, blue, black, and red bars represent average frame rates in StarCraft II, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, Far Cry 3, and an aggregate of all three titles. The orange line indicates cost. Mousing over the bars gives you a pop-up with performance statistics relative to Intel's Core i7-4930K, our 100% ceiling. Mousing over the dots on the orange line pops up a price that's easily attainable. Clicking a bar or dot gives you the option of shopping for a specific CPU, taking you to a link of our choice in that category. Often, our picks are priced lower than the number displayed.

Price and performance generally scale along a similar upward trend as we look down the chart, not including the pricey Core i7 options. Budget-oriented gamers should pay attention to the significant performance increase available when you step up from the $70 Pentium G3258 to the $125 Core i3-4160, though. The $190 Core i5-4460 looks great, offering performance close to more expensive options that cost well over $200.

After that, the speed-ups are more subtle, while the premiums are far greater (particularly as you look to the $590 Core i7-5930K). Frankly, if value is an important consideration, there's little reason to spend $190 on a Core i5-4460 (or even more on a Core i7) unless you want to overclock it for a better experience in some of your other apps. The Core i5-4460 is a clear performance-per-dollar winner, demonstrating no weaknesses in any of the games we've tested.

Price Starcraft Skyrim Far Cry 3 Average
Intel Pentium G3258 70.00 Amazon 75 58 76 69.7
AMD FX-6300 100 Newegg 73 61 87 74
Intel Core i3-4160 125 Newegg 85 74 84 81
Intel Core i5-4460 190 Newegg 99 97 95 97
Intel Core i5-4690K 240 Newegg 99 97 95 97
Intel Core i7-4790K 340 Newegg 100 100 100 100
Intel Core i7-5930K 570 Amazon 100 100 100 100

Add a comment
Ask a Category Expert
React To This Article

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 40 comments.
  • 1 Hide
    adamovera , November 15, 2014 10:24 AM
    Archived comments are found here: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-2301647/gaming-cpus-money-january-2012.html
  • 1 Hide
    de5_Roy , November 15, 2014 10:54 AM
    the kaveri apus have finally come down to tolerable price points. not as gaming cpus (to be combo'd with powerful dgfx) but as general purpose apus to be used in small cases. otoh, amd is messing with customers by labelling richland apus with 7xxx model numbering.
  • 1 Hide
    IInuyasha74 , November 15, 2014 11:09 AM
    I feel like soon they really need to start leveling these out more instead of having pretty much every Core i5 and Core i7 Intel has made since Sandy Bridge and some of the highest end Core i7 CPUs from the 1st Gen all in the same category. Really the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th gen i5 and i7 CPUs should be two separate groups at least and several other areas are similar. It just really feels it should be spaced out better like how the GPU charts are done to give a more accurate chart.
  • 3 Hide
    Reynod , November 15, 2014 6:03 PM
    Its a good list ... good work as always Don.
  • 1 Hide
    Onus , November 15, 2014 6:14 PM
    I still want to see a definitive article on potential stuttering issues with the G3258 before recommending it for gaming.

    I also strongly agree with the sentiment that the top tier of Intel CPUs needs to be stretched into two or even three tiers.
    Side-by-side, my FX-8320 is not within a single tier of my I5-3570K; no way no how.
  • 3 Hide
    iam2thecrowe , November 15, 2014 6:48 PM
    need to update the games tested or include a few more newer titles.
  • 1 Hide
    rayden54 , November 15, 2014 6:59 PM
    How much value is overclocking potential usually worth price/performance wise given that it's a gamble?
  • 1 Hide
    Rahbot , November 15, 2014 8:30 PM
    Why do you insist on using just Intel CPU's for this, not everyone can afford the high end quad cores... You should post best AMD and then Intel at price range.
  • 5 Hide
    Onus , November 15, 2014 9:21 PM
    Rahbot, this is a Best CPU for the Money listing. For the general case (to which this applies), AMD vs. Intel is irrelevant. For a given budget, the best CPU is listed, no matter who makes it. About the only special cases you'll encounter is those few extremely well-threaded titles, in which case an AMD FX offering may have a small advantage due to its extra threads.
    Rayden, there are so many variables here (silicon lottery, quality of motherboard, quality of cooler, quality of PSU, skill of overclocker) that it is hard to estimate. I'd add at least one tier though, maybe two.
  • -4 Hide
    Rahbot , November 15, 2014 9:57 PM
    Ya but for the money most if not all Intel CPU's aren't really worth the money in my eyes. If its not worth the money, then I don't buy it... That's why I get AMD's over Intel.. My friend buys Intel CPU's and he wonders why my AMD works better than his Intel counterparts. We run about the same system, and do about the same thing. But he pays more for his systems. We both agree that if we were Millionaires that buying a Intel 6+ Core with 32GB+ of ram and 1K+ GPU's with SSD's in RAID is worth it for what we do.... but I make less than my friend and I still get better FPS in games, I also use Nvidia and he mostly uses ATI/AMD Cards but he is going to make the switch to Nvidia soon, and maybe we will see that Intel does better with a Nvidia GPU. On the other hand we will see what Nvidia will do with his Intel i7-4770k. Note I run a FX-8320 AMD CPU with Nvidia's GTX 770, 16GB of Memory, Black ED Hard drives, with Green drives for data storage. Also we run @ Stock or small OC's on our systems.
  • 0 Hide
    imamon , November 16, 2014 1:28 AM
    Each and every cpu mentioned here is at least $10 to $15 more in India. Probably the innumerable taxes so once the cost of all the components add up, the difference in cost of a single system build on pcpartpickers and Indian market is enough to make a grown person cry :( 

    And if you could please update the cpu hierarchy list? Why all the generations of intel 4th generation i5 and i7 whatchamacallits cramped together in a single or two tiers along with their predecessors?
  • 1 Hide
    chimera201 , November 16, 2014 5:46 AM
    Still waiting for the CPU Hierarchy Chart to get updated
  • 0 Hide
    freakysqeeky , November 16, 2014 2:17 PM
    Just wanted to point out the Technical Specifications for the 5930k has ddr3 down as the memory it supports.
    Its ddr4 not to confuse anyone. And that's pretty easy to do with the hardware today.
  • 0 Hide
    Mac266 , November 16, 2014 3:07 PM
    Couple of issues with the 5930k recommendation.

    First, to do with the memory. It supports DDR4 1333/1600/2133.

    Second, The socket is 2011-v3
  • 0 Hide
    Gurg , November 16, 2014 3:11 PM
    Quote:
    need to update the games tested or include a few more newer titles.


    If they did that then the 4790k and 5930K would both be at less than 100% as the best performer in the Haswell E review was the 5820K. The 5820k beat the 4790k in 4/7 games at 2560x1440, The 5820k beat the 5930k in 6/7 games. None of those games are used in this recommendation, though I would be curious to see how the 5820k compared in the games actually used for this article.
  • 0 Hide
    yumri , November 16, 2014 3:14 PM
    what was actually used for this article to rate the CPUs?
  • 1 Hide
    Mac266 , November 16, 2014 3:17 PM
    Quote:
    Ya but for the money most if not all Intel CPU's aren't really worth the money in my eyes. If its not worth the money, then I don't buy it... That's why I get AMD's over Intel.. My friend buys Intel CPU's and he wonders why my AMD works better than his Intel counterparts. We run about the same system, and do about the same thing. But he pays more for his systems. We both agree that if we were Millionaires that buying a Intel 6+ Core with 32GB+ of ram and 1K+ GPU's with SSD's in RAID is worth it for what we do.... but I make less than my friend and I still get better FPS in games, I also use Nvidia and he mostly uses ATI/AMD Cards but he is going to make the switch to Nvidia soon, and maybe we will see that Intel does better with a Nvidia GPU. On the other hand we will see what Nvidia will do with his Intel i7-4770k. Note I run a FX-8320 AMD CPU with Nvidia's GTX 770, 16GB of Memory, Black ED Hard drives, with Green drives for data storage. Also we run @ Stock or small OC's on our systems.


    What GPU is he running? Because an i7 4770k is far and away better than a 8320.
  • 0 Hide
    dgingeri , November 17, 2014 3:54 PM
    You guys still have the memory info on the 5930K messed up. It still says DDR3-1066/1333/1600. The socket still says 2011, which should be 2011-3.
  • 1 Hide
    MrChain , November 17, 2014 11:19 PM
    Should correct " little reason to buy a 4460 or i-7 unless you plan to over clock". 4460 should be 4690k to malloe sense...
  • 0 Hide
    zzzxtreme , November 19, 2014 10:55 PM
    so ,Intel Pentium G3258 can play all older games without problems? what about Diablo3 at low settings ?
Display more comments
React To This Article

placing