In an effort to further illustrate the performance you get for every dollar spent on our recommendations, we chart out the hierarchy of processors in our column. The green, blue, black, and red bars represent average frame rates in StarCraft II, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, Far Cry 3, and an aggregate of all three titles. The orange line indicates cost. Mousing over the bars gives you a pop-up with performance statistics relative to Intel's Core i7-4930K, our 100% ceiling. Mousing over the dots on the orange line pops up a price that's easily attainable. Clicking a bar or dot gives you the option of shopping for a specific CPU, taking you to a link of our choice in that category. Often, our picks are priced lower than the number displayed.
Price and performance generally scale along a similar upward trend as we look down the chart, not including the pricey Core i7 options. Budget-oriented gamers should pay attention to the significant performance increase available when you step up from the $70 Pentium G3258 to the $125 Core i3-4160, though. The $190 Core i5-4460 looks great, offering performance close to more expensive options that cost well over $200.
After that, the speed-ups are more subtle, while the premiums are far greater (particularly as you look to the $590 Core i7-5930K). Frankly, if value is an important consideration, there's little reason to spend $190 on a Core i5-4460 (or even more on a Core i7) unless you want to overclock it for a better experience in some of your other apps. The Core i5-4460 is a clear performance-per-dollar winner, demonstrating no weaknesses in any of the games we've tested.
| Price | Starcraft | Skyrim | Far Cry 3 | Average | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Pentium G3258 | ![]() |
70.00 | Amazon | 75 | 58 | 76 | 69.7 |
| AMD FX-6300 | ![]() |
100 | Newegg | 73 | 61 | 87 | 74 |
| Intel Core i3-4160 | ![]() |
125 | Newegg | 85 | 74 | 84 | 81 |
| Intel Core i5-4460 | ![]() |
190 | Newegg | 99 | 97 | 95 | 97 |
| Intel Core i5-4690K | ![]() |
240 | Newegg | 99 | 97 | 95 | 97 |
| Intel Core i7-4790K | ![]() |
340 | Newegg | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Intel Core i7-5930K | ![]() |
570 | Amazon | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |






I also strongly agree with the sentiment that the top tier of Intel CPUs needs to be stretched into two or even three tiers.
Side-by-side, my FX-8320 is not within a single tier of my I5-3570K; no way no how.
Rayden, there are so many variables here (silicon lottery, quality of motherboard, quality of cooler, quality of PSU, skill of overclocker) that it is hard to estimate. I'd add at least one tier though, maybe two.
And if you could please update the cpu hierarchy list? Why all the generations of intel 4th generation i5 and i7 whatchamacallits cramped together in a single or two tiers along with their predecessors?
Its ddr4 not to confuse anyone. And that's pretty easy to do with the hardware today.
First, to do with the memory. It supports DDR4 1333/1600/2133.
Second, The socket is 2011-v3
If they did that then the 4790k and 5930K would both be at less than 100% as the best performer in the Haswell E review was the 5820K. The 5820k beat the 4790k in 4/7 games at 2560x1440, The 5820k beat the 5930k in 6/7 games. None of those games are used in this recommendation, though I would be curious to see how the 5820k compared in the games actually used for this article.
What GPU is he running? Because an i7 4770k is far and away better than a 8320.