Best offers
|
P7P55D Motherboard (Intel Socket H... | $149.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A785TD-V EVO AMD 785G/SB710 Socket... | $84.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD4P Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $169.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GA-P55-UD3R Motherboard (Intel Socket... | $139.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
M4A78T-E Motherboard (AMD, AM3, AMD... | $129.99 Newegg.com More info |
- motherboard performance benchmark
- ich10 performance
- small benchmark
- difference between p35 and p45 chipset
- compare p45 p35
- which is faster ddr3 1600 versus ddr3 1333
- what is the difference between p45 and p35 motherboards
- pci express supports pci express 2.0
- pci express 2.0 benchmark
- pci express 2 performance benchmark
- p45 chipset ddr3
- motherboard p35 p45
- p35 and p45 differences
- p45 chipset ddr3 speed
- ddr3 1333 versus 1600
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (32) |
- Share
Although Intel officially supports only 1333 MHz FSB speeds, many motherboard manufacturers decided to support 1600 MHz settings as well, so we benchmarked both. In an effort to directly assess the performance difference, we reduced the Core 2 Extreme Q9770’s core clock speed from 3.2 GHz to 3.0 GHz, as this would allow running 3.0 GHz either at 1333 MHz or 1600 MHz.
We selected DDR2-800 memory at CL4-4-4-12 timings for all benchmark runs. Please note that the X48 motherboard we used utilized DDR3 memory, so we had to switch to DDR3-1066.
We ran all benchmarks at least three times, and used the average result of all benchmark runs. As you will see, there is no clear performance winner, as the differences are too small. This includes the enthusiast X38 and X48 chipsets, as well as the mainstream P35 and P45 chipsets, and 1333 MHz versus 1600 MHz—the effective difference is close to zero.
3D Benchmarks

Prey delivers slightly faster frame rates when running on a host system that operates at 1600 MHz speed. However, the difference is too small to justify purchasing an expensive X48 motherboard over one using P45 or P35, unless you want dual x16 PCI Express 2.0 graphics.

We only use Quake 4 for platform benchmarks as it is not graphics limited due to its outdated graphics feature set. As a consequence, the platform typically creates the bottleneck. Here you can see that 1600 MHz does make a difference, but again the performance benefits are really small.

Different benchmark, same results: there are only minor performance improvements for 1600 MHz over 1333 MHz bus speeds.

- SLI on intel p45 chipset [Graphic & Displays]
- Will a single 8800 GT perform to next summer. [Graphic & Displays]
- *Guide to Choosing Parts* [Homebuilt Systems]
- Which chipset is best for a EVGA 6800-GT? [Graphic & Displays]
- Down to two different Rigs. Please Help choose. [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Best Motherboard for E8500
- Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide
- HOWTO: Overclock C2Q (Quads) and C2D (Duals) - Guide v1.6.1
- What is the best way to overclock the Q9650?
- Xigmatek HDT-S1283 on a E8400 in a P5Q-E
- Gigabyte EP45T-UD3P random freeze
- Upgraded RAM and the Vista Experience Score went down
- Help choosing Mobo
- Motherboard help?
- A good stable mb for intel quad
- *Guide to Choosing Parts*
- 1st build gaming rig - advice appreciated
- $840 Budget, Omfg herlp!
- $500.00 upgrade budget whats the smart thing to do







Not sure most readers here care about power consumption, although we all will need to start soon. Pretty sure the P5Q-E supports BOTH PCI-E 16x1 OR 8x2.
I'm not sure the power consumption comparison is completely fair towards the P45 cipset. The used P35 motherboard has 6 phases, if I'm not mistaken, while the P5Q-E and EP45-DQ6 have 8 and 12 phases respectively. I would have loved to see a power consumption survey that took this into account.
However, you definitely proved a point. One would expect that the power consumption went down with the die-shrink. Not up or stay at the same level.
Considering what the video, cpu use, I could care less about mb wattage. When the other stuff gets a lot lower I'll care, till then zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.
I'm not sure the power consumption comparison is completely fair towards the P45 cipset. The used P35 motherboard has 6 phases, if I'm not mistaken, while the P5Q-E and EP45-DQ6 have 8 and 12 phases respectively. I would have loved to see a power consumption survey that took this into account.However, you definitely proved a point. One would expect that the power consumption went down with the die-shrink. Not up or stay at the same level.
There was no die shrink? All the extra power is going to be coming from the PCI-E 2.0...And,I know I'm going to shock people!But,10 watts isn't shit!
So PCI-E 2.0 is not worth having right now, is it? I mean if i had a HD4850 card would it make a difference with PCI-E 2.0 and PIC-E 1? Now P45 boards cost much more than P35 and seeing as it delivers no performance gain, i think P35 is the way to go.
And yes, 10watt difference is a lot, really.
I have the P5Q-E and it DOSE support 8x 8x PCIe 2.0 CrossFire. I know this for a fact as I am running it right now. Hell, you could even add in another 4850 in the lower slot at 4x PCIe 1. Come on Toms team. Also, what about relitave CrossFire performance compared to the X38/48? I have been dying for this article from you guys just for that comparison.
The power consumption is important but you can't make a definite conclusion about P35 vs P45 from just two motherboards. Power consumption even on the same chipset varies a lot between motherboards. Maybe try the Gigabyte P5Q-E (just guessing from the reasonably sized heatsinks)?
There's no point in buying a p45 or an x48 if you already have the p35/x38. Wait for Nehalem!
What I really would like to see is a P35/P45 vs X38/X48 mashup!
^Agreed! In some cases the P45 beats the X38 when it comes to OCing (ie high stable FSBs on P45)
I think there's a typo descriping the type of memory supported by the MSI P45 Diamond motherboard. It states "The Diamond version supports DDR2 instead of DDR3, which makes sense at this time. ". The Diamond only supports DDR3.
I see nothing wrong with the "small" improvements added to the P45 series. The P45 boards are the same price as the P35 with the small improvements. They won't awe the hardcore gamer, but improvements to power management is cool for everyone.

What we really need now is for the price of DDR3 (which will save around 4 watts) to drop from the sky.
I look forward to seeing how the new integrated graphics of the G45 perform.
This review has very different results for power consumption.
It shows the P45 using quite a bit less than the P35.
When combined with the opposite results you are seeing, It appears the issue may be in the boards you tested and not the P45 chipset itself.
http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/1 [...] index.html
There's no point in buying a p45 or an x48 if you already have the p35/x38. Wait for Nehalem!
Agreed. Well said.
Hey AUTHOR:
Can you post/send your overclocking setting or asus o.c. profile so I can see your setup. I just got the board and wanna see how I can do on the newest BIOS. Thanks!
I plan to order a new build based on Q9450 and 4850 GPU. I was going to choose P45 (P5Q) since I do not plan to overclock nor do I plan to crossfire. I get PCIE 2.0 and the most stable chipset possible for this build. The X48 would be wasted $$$ and overkill. Not sure why this conclusion was missing from the article.
i would have rather liked to know more about amd's new 7 series chipsets. there is VERY little documentation/benchmarks on them. It would be awesome to see a "performance/price" review on very comparable motherboards changing pretty much ONLY the chipset. I would like a 790fx, but thus far i havn't been able to find a whole lot of comparison data telling me that the difference (other than more video card support) between "x" and "fx" or even the 770 for that matter (770=no crossfirex/sli)
ANYWHO chipsets seem to be pretty under the radar, and kudo's for actually paying attention to them. Now for those new fangled amd ones? :-p
Biostar Tpower I45? .. how did you manage to leave that board out, cheap and proberly the best board around?
Agreed they really should have tested the Biostar Tpower I45 and/or TForce TP43D2A7 since they both claim record breaking OC performance and aren't really any more expensive than other P43/P45 boards to buy. I personally have the TForce TP43D2A7 and while I've only run it up to 400bus speed 1600fsb it's very stable and a great deal for the price point plus supports the newer Intel processors which in and of itself is nice compared to some of the P35 motherboards which require a bios update first. PCI 2.0 will only become more important in the future as well, but that was basically mentioned anyway.
Biostar Tpower I45? .. how did you manage to leave that board out, cheap and proberly the best board around?
Keep your eyes peeled, we plan to look at this one in an upcoming roundup!