Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i review: Meteor Lake dazzles on performance and endurance

Meteor Lake shoots for the stars

Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5i
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Lenovo is firing on all cylinders with its Meteor Lake-equipped IdeaPad Pro 5i. It offers a blend of performance and endurance at a reasonable price.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Meteor Lake shows strong performance and excellent battery life

  • +

    Lightweight aluminum chassis with plenty of ports

  • +

    Attractive pricing

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Speakers and webcam could be better

  • -

    M.2 2242 SSD instead of 2280

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Lenovo is among the first to release new products that Intel’s new mobile processors built on 14th-generation Meteor Lake microarchitecture. The IdeaPad Pro 5i ($1,149 as tested) provides a strong first impression.

The IdeaPad Pro 5i features a Core Ultra 5 125H processor, 16GB of LPDDR5 memory, a 1TB SSD, and Intel Arc graphics. It’s a well-built machine with a sleek aluminum chassis, a large and comfortable keyboard, a bright 16-inch 2K display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and an as-configured price of $1,149. 

Lenovo has given us a glimpse at the performance and efficiency potential of Meter Lake and wrapped it into a reasonably priced package that stands out in a crowded field.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Brandon Hill
Senior Editor

Brandon Hill is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware. He has written about PC and Mac tech since the late 1990s with bylines at AnandTech, DailyTech, and Hot Hardware. When he is not consuming copious amounts of tech news, he can be found enjoying the NC mountains or the beach with his wife and two sons.

  • Roland Of Gilead
    Did I miss the part where the CPU has a max draw of 115w!? Hmmmm :unsure:
    Reply
  • salgado18
    Let me know when they fit an 84 Wh battery inside a Ryzen notebook, and then we'll talk about endurance. It's easy to say it lasts longer when it has a bigger battery.
    Reply
  • ikjadoon
    I think the DCI-P3 and sRGB columns & data have been flipped:

    Reply
  • kaalus
    It's one ugly laptop.
    Reply
  • Bikki
    Battery test with movie loop is pretty pointless, it only test the fixed funtion video block on the cpu. Lets use something more diverse that inclues both performace score and run time. My suggestion is to run puget bench or cinebench loop, then multiply the score with run time, divided by battery wh. So we have something akin to efficiency benchmark.
    Reply
  • Prachu
    About storage upgradeability, why didn't you mention that this laptop has a second, full sized free M.2 SSD slot where you can put whatever you want?
    Reply
  • rtoaht
    Bikki said:
    Battery test with movie loop is pretty pointless, it only test the fixed funtion video block on the cpu. Lets use something more diverse that inclues both performace score and run time. My suggestion is to run puget bench or cinebench loop, then multiply the score with run time, divided by battery wh. So we have something akin to efficiency benchmark.
    I understand the point you’re trying to make. But think about this. Is Cinebench loop a realistic workload for potential average users of this laptop? Nobody will use this laptop dedicated for Cinebench all day. Video playback could actually be a bit more realistic but obviously not the only thing people will use it for. Other realistic use cases could be web browsing, video editing (not rendering), editing Microsoft office apps, and playing games for battery life tests. Other than these, I personally care about battery life in sleep mode. I typically keep my laptop in sleep mode 24/7 because I always have multiple windows open and I don’t want to lose my workflow by shutting my laptop down. But not sure if others commonly do it too.
    Reply
  • ikjadoon
    Bikki said:
    Battery test with movie loop is pretty pointless, it only test the fixed funtion video block on the cpu. Lets use something more diverse that inclues both performace score and run time. My suggestion is to run puget bench or cinebench loop, then multiply the score with run time, divided by battery wh. So we have something akin to efficiency benchmark.

    rtoaht said:
    I understand the point you’re trying to make. But think about this. Is Cinebench loop a realistic workload for potential average users of this laptop? Nobody will use this laptop dedicated for Cinebench all day. Video playback could actually be a bit more realistic but obviously not the only thing people will use it for. Other realistic use cases could be web browsing, video editing (not rendering), editing Microsoft office apps, and playing games for battery life tests. Other than these, I personally care about battery life in sleep mode. I typically keep my laptop in sleep mode 24/7 because I always have multiple windows open and I don’t want to lose my workflow by shutting my laptop down. But not sure if others commonly do it too.

    I agree here that Tom's Hardware's battery life testing is not ideal, but I might not also go too far in the other direction of Cinebench. Though I do like the idea of normalizing for battery capacity.

    What I'd ideally love is similar to rtoaht:
    On the network, have cached copies of modern websites (YouTube, news, etc.). So many benches like PCMark's battery life test use like 10kb websites made in 2002, with zero network usage to boot.
    Run a few desktop applications (portable copies to keep versions the same between reviews): office, Teams / Zoom, and then some file transfers (USB, upload online, whatever).
    Loop that until it dies at some X brightness & Z volume.The key notes:
    Laptop battery life is not just the CPU, but the entire system: display, storage, RAM, CPU, GPU, fans, etc. So the test should be broad, not one thing like video viewing (TH today) nor 3D rendering (Cinebench)
    We need to control a lot of software versions: the OS is tough, but everything else should be doable.
    Web usage is so critical to thin and light laptop battery life. Without honest to goodness web usage, I just can't trust any battery life review anymore.
    Reply