Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i review: The most luxurious ultrabook

An aesthetic masterpiece, this OLED ultrabook impresses except for battery life and port selection.

Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

Lenovo’s Yoga Slim 9i redefines ultrabook elegance with its glass-inspired design and innovative webcam. While its battery life isn’t the longest, the trade-off is a dazzling OLED screen. Also save up for adapters, because it has few ports.

Pros

  • +

    Spectacular OLED touch screen

  • +

    Ultra stylish and slim

  • +

    Comfortable keyboard

  • +

    Good speakers

  • +

    Quiet cooling fan

Cons

  • -

    Just two USB Type-C ports and no headphone jack

  • -

    Middling battery life

  • -

    Subpar webcam

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Every once in a while, we come across a laptop that makes us reconsider what luxury looks like. Lenovo’s 14-inch Yoga Slim 9i ($1,834.99 as tested) is the apex of class and style when it comes to Windows laptops, with a sleek glass lid and an ultra-thin profile that even smaller-screen laptops struggle to match. It also has one of the finest displays we’ve ever laid eyes on. That said, this beauty isn’t without its flaws, so be sure to weigh your options among the best ultrabooks carefully before maxing out your credit card.

Design of the Lenovo Yoga Slim 9i

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Charles Jefferies
Freelance Reviewer

Charles Jefferies is a freelance reviewer for Tom’s Hardware US. He covers laptop and desktop PCs, especially gaming models.

  • Findecanor
    Disappointing that the key column on the right isn't used for navigation keys.
    If the cursor keys had been moved one step to the right, there would have been room for something actually useful beside the useless Copilot key.
    Reply
  • Notton
    At first, I thought they only had 2x TB4 ports due to the keyboard size consuming most of the space, but from the internal pictures, it looks like it's just a poor design choice.

    Also that single 2242 slot... disgusting.
    Reply
  • newtechldtech
    Notton said:
    Also that single 2242 slot... disgusting.
    What is disgusting about a port exactly ? at least be thankful it is not soldered.
    Reply
  • Notton
    newtechldtech said:
    What is disgusting about a port exactly ? at least be thankful it is not soldered.
    Yeah, because 2242 is a very common size. Who cares if it doesn't fit a 2280, it shaves 5g off the chassis.
    Reply
  • excalibur1814
    2242 is a bit random. If you're saving weight, 2230.
    Reply
  • abufrejoval
    So much effort in order to create a better Macbook...

    ...only to fail at creating a better Macbook.

    I'd sure hate working at Intel on a mission like that.

    An in this case, I'd have to guess that it's mostly the display which
    a) has it look better than a Macbook (because those don't have OLED)
    b) has it perform much worse than a Macbook, because it eats every Wh the Lunar Lake SoC so desperately tried to save to get the battery time... there is a reason Macbooks don't have OLED.

    There used to be all these nice interesting display techniques to enable far lower power use for productivity workloads like Mirasol.

    But these days consumers want to have their eyes burned out from color overload in their dark room, where black is truly black and every pixel can transform into a laser burning your retina...

    If only consumers didn't want it all!

    Not only is this device terribly expensive, I'd dare say their life time or chance to remain attractive beyond perhaps a year is minimal.
    Reply