Dell XPS 13 (9350) review: Lunar Lake on defense

Intel faces off against Qualcomm in Dell's XPS 13.

Dell XPS 13 9350
(Image credit: © Tom's Hardware)

Tom's Hardware Verdict

The Dell XPS 13 gets long battery life thanks to Intel's Lunar Lake. While its design is attractive, the touch-based function row is difficult to use as it prioritizes form over function.

Reasons to buy

  • +

    Long battery life (with LCD display)

  • +

    Attractive, minimalist design

Reasons to avoid

  • -

    Capacitive function row isn't as good as dedicated keys

  • -

    No headphone jack

  • -

    Pricey

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

Dell's XPS 13 is finally available with multiple CPU options. Where previously it only ever came with Intel processors, it's now available with both Intel's Core Ultra 2 "Lunar Lake" chips and Qualcomm's Snapdragon X Elite. The competition to be among the best ultrabooks is on.


We tested the Snapdragon version previously, and while Dell's design is as divisive as ever, it's hard to argue with a mix of performance and power. That gave us high hopes for the Lunar Lake model.

What the Intel version offers is more app compatibility, and long battery life, but the performance isn't as good as Qualcomm's. If you want a Dell XPS 13 with an x86 processor, the XPS 13 (9350) is for you. But if you're not worried about app compatibility, the Intel versions are challenged by Dell's embrace of Qualcomm.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • cknobman
    Terrible design and a complete ripoff.

    These models stay relevant purely because of companies buying them to hand out to employees.
    And the employees hate them.
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    That keyboard looks awful, in so many ways.

    For example, people are going to hurt their finger when they hit the edge of the fingerprint reader when trying to press Backspace.
    Reply
  • vink
    It looks very good, works excellently and Intel does its job OK. I'm still interested in a FANLESS model only for simple tasks such as office, audio, video, shopping and with a low consumption of 7W and necessarily with a 14" Display. It can be minimalistic with 2 USB-C, any known brand and cheaper one pic. If you have any information, I would appreciate it.
    Reply
  • Notton
    I never thought I'd say this, but maybe the left side of the keyboard doesn't need to be that... large.
    Unless they added more keys for different language layouts.
    Reply
  • helper800
    vink said:
    It looks very good, works excellently and Intel does its job OK. I'm still interested in a FANLESS model only for simple tasks such as office, audio, video, shopping and with a low consumption of 7W and necessarily with a 14" Display. It can be minimalistic with 2 USB-C, any known brand and cheaper one pic. If you have any information, I would appreciate it.
    I am not aware of any fanless laptops, not that I know all laptops, but especially with the other kinds of specs you are looking for.
    Reply
  • BillyBuerger
    Notton said:
    I never thought I'd say this, but maybe the left side of the keyboard doesn't need to be that... large.
    Unless they added more keys for different language layouts.
    Good point. The left modifiers are an extra 1/2u wider than usual. They could have shrunk that and put a thin border along the sides of the keyboard. Having picked up a few of these for some of our employees, the edges along things like the keyboard are a bit harsh. It's noticeable when grabbing along the edge there.
    Reply
  • Mama Changa
    cknobman said:
    Terrible design and a complete ripoff.

    These models stay relevant purely because of companies buying them to hand out to employees.
    And the employees hate them.
    Inagree, XPS13 has been trash for a very long time and in general XPS is crap now. I'd probably even by a Lenoblo now ahead of a Dell.
    Reply
  • Jame5
    I mean, Apple went through this cycle. They pulled the physical function row, then brought back the physical escape key as an appeasement, and now they have a full physical function key row again.

    What part of that terrible series of events did Dell look at and think "We should totally do that. It worked out great!"

    I have loved my Dell XPS 15, with it's headphone jack, physical function key row, and expandable memory options. Now that none of that exists in the XPS line, I'm looking for what my next laptop will be.
    Reply
  • dCasualGamer
    All these benchmarks are fine, but what exactly do they mean to an average users? Battery life of 8:40 is bad but a regular users probably won't really tell the difference between the 17:29 vs 19:31, especially if the battery life will change depending on the workloads.
    The article made a casual reference to SW compatibility but without discussing it in details. What does it mean to a non technical PC buyers.. Which SW can the Qualcomm laptop runs and which it can't run ? Who would spend $1000 on a laptop to gamble if it can run some SWs ?
    Geekbench scores are fine, but again, what does it mean to me ? When will i ever need to use ALL the cores for me to notice the lower Intel multicore score ?
    What about casual gaming ? Can I play games casually ? Can the laptops even run the games ? There's nothing in this article..

    At the end of the day, this article gives me a lot of info, but yet doesn't provide me any good guidance on what to pick.
    Reply
  • bigdragon
    cknobman said:
    And the employees hate them.
    Can confirm! My office just got a bunch of XPS 16 systems to replace XPS 15s that predate Dell's current keyboard and touchpad design. Most people, including myself, have been complaining about the feel of the keyboard and the capacitive buttons. Having Escape and Delete as capacitive buttons is a big problem for people doing development and prototyping work. Several shortcuts are also a total pain in the butt to do too (particularly Blender's F3 search).

    The Dell XPS laptops have some good hardware and displays. That keyboard and the borderless touchpad really hold them back though. Companies need to stop designing everything to look good in a magazine or ad and get back to designing things for users. If I didn't need the GPU in the XPS 16 then I would go back to using the XPS 15.
    Reply