AMD: Developers Use PhysX Only For The Cash

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • Hilarion
    Not surprising since Nvidia seems to be falling behind and grasping at straws to catch up...
    Reply
  • dman3k
    Wait... Didn't DirectX won over OpenGL???
    Reply
  • victomofreality
    Sounds like PR to me but it does have a valid point, why limit yourself more then you have to especially with the gpu manufacturer that is 6 months behind?
    Reply
  • Lutfij
    i agree , they have nothing better to do than come out with a renamed/revamped version of their older chips...shame...just a waste of resources!
    Reply
  • drfdisk
    When the 5870s came out I was more than happy to jump ship to ATI because of practices like this. At the very least they could allow an Nvidia card running PhysX to do so in the same system that has another brand card running graphics. They are doing nothing but hurting their customers and reputation. We all see how far they got with SLI only running on nforce boards.
    Reply
  • sliem
    Title is somewhat misleading.
    Reply
  • OvrClkr
    I dont think is relevant at all, its not like PhysX is actually going to boost sales. Price to performance is what matters not PhysX. NV is behind ATM, PhysX is not going to save the company, lower pricing and not screwing up is what they should be focusing on.



    Reply
  • ohim
    oh and waiting for fermi to go out so my next radeo 5xxx card can get cheaper.
    Reply
  • Nvidia just cant keep up with the rate at which ATI pumps out new cards. In order for Nvidia to keep its customer base from switching, its hamstringing ATI's cards by paying game developers to simply not fully support ati's hardware capabilities. The game utilizes the gpu hardware. If nvidia controls the game developer, they will never have to worry about ATI becoming "king of the hill" in the gpu world.
    Reply
  • Drag0nR1der
    umm, so? The developer gets some cash, and Nvidia users get some extra fizz and pop in their games.. sounds like win win to me.
    Reply