Nvidia: Quadro Helped ILM Animate Rango

25

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • nforce4max
    LOL
    Reply
  • Yeah 'LOL' pretty much sums it up.
    Reply
  • zerocoolx
    Translation:

    ILM: Let's advertise for Nvidia!
    Nvidia: We'll give you 450 free Quadro cards in exchange.
    ILM: Hopefully this helps get people talking about this turd-fest of a movie.
    Nvidia: Hopefully this will help us sell more of our overpriced cards!

    SYNERGY!!!!
    Reply
  • rohitbaran
    @^
    So true!
    Reply
  • lamorpa
    That movie had no bias toward age, race, or personality type. Pretty much everyone could find some part of it that irritated them.
    Reply
  • mobrocket
    I thought the movie was decent, animation was excellent...
    one of the better movies so far of 2011...

    Reply
  • Parsian
    lol oh marketing ...
    Reply
  • rhino13
    Rango was sooo bad.
    Clearly would have been helped by going with AMD.

    Wait, what were we talking about?
    Reply
  • fayzaan
    rhino13Rango was sooo bad.Clearly would have been helped by going with AMD.Wait, what were we talking about?
    We was talking about the Quadro! I findeth this funnies...o well, atleast I got warned not to watch this movie, iz crap i hears!
    Reply
  • zerocoolx
    @rhino13

    Attention trolls:
    Following comment is made of silica. DO NOT EAT.

    You're missing the point. This isn't an article. It's an ad and rational people with realistic budgets would definitely go FireGL all the way. There's no excuse for the Quadro series being so damn expensive. Cost vs performance is what the majority of people care about. ILM can choose to ignore all that and use whatever they want to use, but why am I hearing about it?

    Oh right, because this is yellow journalism at it's best. Why must I limit my comments to what you want to hear? It's still on topic. In fact it's more on topic than your comment and, in a way, the article itself!
    Reply