Adata Enters DRAMless Space With 2D, 3D TLC NAND SSDs As "HDD Replacements" Come To Fore

An industry-wide transition to TLC-powered SSDs is inevitable due to the lower price structure and increased density offered by the less-endurant form of NAND. TLC (Triple Level Cell) NAND stores three bits of data per cell, in comparison to MLC (Multi-Level Cell), which stores only two bits. The addition of an extra bit of data increases density by storing more data in the same space, but it also wears the NAND faster, thus reducing endurance. This means that TLC falls into the value bin while MLC is the high-end offering.

3D NAND changes the TLC game a bit, as it offers much more endurance than standard 2D (planar) NAND along with higher performance and even more storage density. 3D NAND is the almost perfect medium for TLC NAND; its endurance rivals 2D MLC NAND, but unfortunately, it commands a higher cost than its 2D TLC NAND counterpart.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Nintendork
    I prefer just to spend that tiny bit more and go the 850EVO or Sandisk Extreme 500GB.
    Reply
  • V Rodionov
    I see these SSDs as a perfect fit for current PS4 HDD replacement.
    Reply
  • mapesdhs
    Somehow it feels atm that SSD tech is moving backwards a bit. Rather than move to higher capacities at the same price points (or allow a natural price lowering to occur over time as tech evolves), the industry is trying to sell products that are worse than previous designs just to get sales at lower price levels and drive volume. Not impressed. Stick to better designs and better reliability, it's worth the extra cost.
    Reply
  • Carskick
    I've used the cheap TLC drives from ADATA and Mushkin to refurbish old machine and as secondary storage for games. For those types of usages, I think they're perfect! But as a primary drive in a new build, I agree, get something better!
    Reply