AMD Adds Dynamic Mode for Threadripper, Two New Chips Coming In October

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • thrones.rush
    $1,299 cpu not sure how you can call that more accessible. to the vast majority of people its stratospherically out of reach
    Reply
  • stdragon
    I was wondering about that bottleneck. I know that in dual socket servers, that with VMs you want to prevent NUMA spanning. Basically, each CPU has direct access to its own bank of RAM. Each CPU package can cross over to the member bank on the other side, but in doing so there's a performance penalty.

    Well, in many ways this like NUMA, but within the CPU package. Think of two socketed CPUs in one package. Anytime a process is split between two dies instead of running multiple threads on the same die, there will be a similar performance hit as that link between the two is the bottleneck.

    Anyways, I'm very glad that AMD had a solution to this.
    Reply
  • rinosaur
    21378042 said:
    $1,299 cpu not sure how you can call that more accessible. to the vast majority of people its stratospherically out of reach

    The target audience for TR is content creators who normally have to shell out big money for wide processing loads. This is $500 less than the 2990 and will probably match it in *some* workloads. $500 saved will buy you 64GB of RAM.

    Reply
  • pawinda
    Chart above shows TR4 1950X with 64MB L3 Cache. Isn't it actually 32MB?
    Reply
  • pawinda
    Chart also shows TR4 1920x with 64MB L3 cache.
    Reply
  • newsonline5000000
    I wonder how this Dynamic mode is made secure ? I dont like it security wise , and I expect hackers will soon use it to find back doors to the system memory.
    Reply
  • secretxax
    But will Dynamic Local mode be available to the UEFI or Ryzen Master only?
    Reply
  • stdragon
    It's a Windows service based application provided by AMD. But ultimately this would be better implemented at the OS kernel. Hopefully the next build of Windows 10 will have it implemented so that an application isn't required anymore.
    Reply
  • rogue_onesie
    21378042 said:
    $1,299 cpu not sure how you can call that more accessible. to the vast majority of people its stratospherically out of reach
    Because it is not for the vast majority of people; it's for extreme workstations - creating movies, engineering , architecture, designing , etc.

    It is the first 32 core / 64 thread CPU and at $1,299 it's a fantastic value ... or you could pay $2,000 for the 18 core Intel i9-7980XE .

    So for powerful industry level performance at the consumer level, yes ... call it very accessible.
    Reply
  • BulkZerker
    1920x still seems like the one to grab for pro-sumers on a budget. It's replacement is $250 more.
    Reply