Report: AMD Radeon HD 7990 6GB Ready To Launch

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • blazorthon
    Is there a good reason to go quad six pin over dual 8 pin PCIe power connectors?
    Reply
  • EzioAs
    9385250 said:
    Is there a good reason to go quad six pin over dual 8 pin PCIe power connectors?

    I agree. You just have to add/use more cables than you need when you can actually get the same power output from 2 8-pin. Weird move indeed :??:
    Reply
  • xtreme5
    useless hardware, will be much expensive, temps like a hell, there is currently no stuff require that type of gpu power. Even 1GB is still better idea.
    Reply
  • All newbs are wrong! I want the 1.21 gigawatts video card. ATI, you know you can do better. Don't let me down!
    Reply
  • phamhlam
    xtreme5useless hardware, will be much expensive, temps like a hell, there is currently no stuff require that type of gpu power. Even 1GB is still better idea.
    It will be allow you to run BF3 on Ultra with 5 monitors haha. Besides that, there is very few who would buy this for professional use. We don't even know the temps.
    Reply
  • leongrado
    Considering that buying this card alone will cost as much as upgrading my entire system, probably not?
    Reply
  • theconsolegamer
    I think AMD should just scrap this card and let Nvidia win the dual GPU crown sinse they already did because AMD is too late to enter this hyper-niche market and focus on releasing the 8990 as the first GPU of the 8000 series so they can get at Nvidia with a significantly more powerful card that consumes less power and newer too.
    Reply
  • a little late AMD?

    i would rather see on making a 8XXX series, a refinement and performance imporvement over 7XXX. now that 28nm should be stable enough to make larger gpus without too low of yeilds.


    Reply
  • horaciopz
    Big fat a$$ of the GPU's incoming :D !
    Reply
  • blazorthon
    a little late AMD?

    i would rather see on making a 8XXX series, a refinement and performance imporvement over 7XXX. now that 28nm should be stable enough to make larger gpus without too low of yeilds.

    Larger GPUs shouldn't be necessary as much as simply improving or replacing the GCN architecture and keeping the chip size fairly similar to what it is now. Higher yields with the same chip size should mean lower costs because each wafer would be more likely to have more functional chips, so you could get higher performance with lower costs of manufacturing that allow prices to drop without profit margins to drop.
    Reply