AMD Now Powers 101 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers

AMD Epyc
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

The Top 500 list of the fastest supercomputers in the world was released today. While there aren't any unexpected changes to the leadership spot — the AMD-powered exascale-class Frontier still ranks as the fastest system in the world while Intel grapples with delays for the Aurora system — the list does reveal that AMD continues to take over more of the top spots. AMD also comprised 84% of the new systems added to the list. 

This release finds AMD powering 101 of the systems on the Top 500, a 38% increase year-over-year on a list that typically sees a somewhat slow rate of change. More importantly, many of these AMD-powered systems are at the top of the list, with AMD now holding four of the top ten spots, and 12 of the top 20. The increased number of AMD systems on the list builds on AMD's strong showing when it jumped to 93 spots in the top 100 when it was last released in June.

AMD is fresh off the release of its EPYC Genoa processors, which we recently reviewed, finding that the chips outclass Intel's incumbent Ice Lake in every type of workload, not to mention while being drastically more power efficient — both of which are key criteria for the world's fastest machines. Moreover, AMD's performance gains often come from an incredible core count advantage: The highest-end Genoa processor has more than twice the number of cores of the Ice Lake Xeons. AMD's advantage should continue for at least the next Intel CPU cycle, too, as Genoa currently has 60% more cores than the as-yet-unreleased Sapphire Rapids, which is rumored to peak at 60 cores. 

As you'd expect, some of the new entrants leverage AMD's newest silicon. For example, Shaheen III, the fastest supercomputer in the Middle East, leverages the fourth-gen EPYC Genoa silicon. 

Not all that glitters is new silicon, though: Another new entrant from HPE is surprisingly powered by AMD's second-gen EPYC Rome silicon. The supercomputer for the Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence (MBZUAI) comes packing 384 Nvidia A100 GPUs paired with AMD's previous-previous-gen silicon, showing that AMD can also continue to carve out new wins even with its older kit. 

Speaking of GPU accelerators, the Top 500 list now has nine systems powered by the AMD Instinct accelerators, an increase of two over the last list. It's obvious that AMD hasn't had as much success with its Instinct lineup of accelerators as it has had on the CPU side of the house, but its move to multi-chip Instinct MI200 GPUs could help it employ the same techniques it did with EPYC to begin to gain more traction. 

Notably, AMD's MI250X accelerators power the world's fastest supercomputer, Frontier, and also rank high on the Green 500, which is the list that comprises the 500 most efficient supercomputers in the world. AMD's CPUs also now power seven of the top ten most efficient systems on the Top 500, nearly doubling the four systems the company powered on the June list. 

Intel's CPUs still dominate the list with a higher total number of systems than AMD. Still, AMD's penetration into the upper ranks, and its share of the new systems, highlights that its CPUs have a performance advantage, giving it a clear pathway for expansion over the next several years. 

Paul Alcorn
Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech

Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • bit_user
    It's obvious that AMD hasn't had as much success with its Instinct lineup of accelerators as it has had on the CPU side of the house, but its move to chiplet-based Instinct MI200 GPUs could help it employ the same techniques it did with EPYC to begin to gain more traction.
    Those don't really count as chiplet-based, IMO. They act like 2 distinct GPUs and basically just happen to share a package.

    I think Intel actually won the race to build the first chiplet-based datacenter GPU, and they did it in quite an extreme fashion. Their Datacenter Max series GPUs has up to 39 compute tiles + 8 HBM stacks. We've never seen anything remotely like it.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-fires-up-xeon-max-cpus-gpus-to-rival-amd-nvidia

    I'm not saying it's necessarily better, but it's hard not to respect their audacity and the accomplishment of getting such a complex product out the door (eventually).
    Reply
  • rluker5
    I don't know if the Frontier should count as an exascale supercomputer if it isn't really functional: World's Fastest Supercomputer Can't Run a Day Without Failure | Tom's Hardware (tomshardware.com)
    But Epyc is the best cpu package right now for total CPU ops.
    Reply
  • prtskg
    rluker5 said:
    I don't know if the Frontier should count as an exascale supercomputer if it isn't really functional: World's Fastest Supercomputer Can't Run a Day Without Failure | Tom's Hardware (tomshardware.com)But Epyc is the best cpu package right now for total CPU ops.
    It isn't functional 24*7 at 100% is expected as it has millions of parts. At such scale some hardware and software problems are normal every day. Things like these keep us engineers in employment.🙂
    Reply
  • bit_user
    rluker5 said:
    I don't know if the Frontier should count as an exascale supercomputer if it isn't really functional: World's Fastest Supercomputer Can't Run a Day Without Failure | Tom's Hardware (tomshardware.com)
    The quote:

    “We are working through issues in hardware and making sure that we understand (what they are),”
    Suggests to me that many of the issues are probably solvable.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The_Git said:
    I got rid of windows a long time ago. And not impressed with the lifespan of Intel either. My AMD rig from 15 years ago, still runs well, when I boot it up on new Linux distros.
    I've never had an Intel CPU fail on me. Nor AMD, but I've run a lot more Intel CPUs than AMD.

    I've also never had an Intel SSD fail, though I've stayed away from the cheap stuff.
    Reply
  • Wisecracker
    . . . . "but its move to multi-chip Instinct MI200 GPUs could help it employ the same techniques it did with EPYC to begin to gain more traction.

    Notably, AMD's MI250X accelerators power the world's fastest supercomputer, Frontier, and also rank high on the Green 500, which is the list that comprises the 500 most efficient supercomputers in the world. AMD's CPUs also now power seven of the top ten most efficient systems, nearly doubling the four systems the company powered on the June list.

    Intel's CPUs still dominate the list with a higher total number of systems than AMD. Still, AMD's penetration into the upper ranks, and its share of the new systems, highlights that its CPUs have a performance advantage, giving it a clear pathway for expansion over the next several years."
    Good for AMD
    Most efficient . . . as compared to a 100000 Gigga-Watt coal plant ??
    ( . . . just kidding ___ they do suck-down some power, though . . . )
    Reply
  • bit_user
    The_Git said:
    Intel have far more failures and higher failure rates ever since they increased their thermals to radiator levels. But because they are upgraded like phones, most people never meet end of life. I have Intels and AMDs from 10+ years ago, as collectors Items that I fire up from time to time. Intels fail over time, more often than AMD from my experience. My oldes AMD is a K6 and it still works with older operating systems and my AMD athlon 64 X2 is running with Modern Linux, My MMX intel chip failed long ago along with the Prescott and the Dual core Pentiums.

    You can't comment on short life of products as you upgrade too quickly, too often.
    I don't upgrade quickly or often. I ran a Pentium 4 from 2005 to 2013. Since then, I had Sandybridge. I picked up another sandybridge in about 2015. My fileserver is AMD Phenom II. I have another box that's a haswell, and then I have a Skylake laptop.

    At my job, we have lots of Intel desktop & server machines. Exclusively Intel. Thousands of Intel servers & desktop machines in the field, and I never hear of CPU failures. Maybe they happen, but it's rare enough that I've never heard about it.
    Reply
  • Gam3r01
    Content has been removed, lets keep things on topic.
    Reply