AMD Now Powers 121 of the World's Fastest Supercomputers

Frontier
(Image credit: ORNL)

The Top 500 list of the fastest supercomputers in the world was released today, and AMD continues its streak of impressive wins with 121 systems now powered by AMD's silicon — a year-over-year increase of 29%. Additionally, AMD continues to hold the #1 spot on the Top 500 with the Frontier supercomputer, while the test and development system based on the same architecture continues to hold the second spot in power efficiency metrics on the Green 500 list. Overall, AMD also powers seven of the top ten systems on the Green 500 list.

The AMD-powered Frontier remains the only fully-qualified exascale-class supercomputer on the planet, as the Intel-powered two-exaflop Aurora has still not submitted a benchmark result after years of delays. In contrast, Frontier is now fully operational and is being used by researchers in a multitude of science workloads.

In fact, Frontier continues to improve from tuning — the system entered the Top 500 list with 1.02 exaflops of performance in June 2022 but has now improved to 1.194 exaflops, a 17% increase. That's an impressive increase from the same 8,699,904 CPU cores it debuted with. For perspective, that extra 92 petaflops of performance from tuning represents the same amount of computational horsepower as the entire Perlmutter system that ranks eighth on the Top 500.

Holding the top spot on the Top 500 is an important milestone, but many of the other AMD-powered systems are also at the top of the list — supercomputers powered by AMD CPUs continue to hold four of the top ten spots while Intel and IBM power two of the top ten apiece. AMD also powers 12 of the top 20 fastest systems in the world.

Intel's CPUs still dominate the list with a higher total number of systems on the Top 500 than AMD. However, AMD continues to expand its share, with 21 of the 44 new systems on the list over the last year powered by AMD silicon. To put things in broader perspective, AMD CPUs powered 13 supercomputers on the list in 2016 but now have reached 121 largely powered by its newer EPYC processors. Meanwhile, Intel declined from 454 machines in 2016 to 360 today, with many of those powered by Xeon chips dating back nearly a decade.

Swipe to scroll horizontally
Top 500 Supercomputer ListAMD CPU PoweredIntel CPU Powered
201613454
2023121360


Frontier also ranks first in the world in the HLP-MxP benchmark, a measure of HPC and AI performance in mixed-precision workloads, with 9.95 exaflops (an improvement over its previous score of 7.9 exaflops). Meanwhile, the AMD-powered LUMI supercomputer holds the second spot with 2.2 exaflops.

Frontier also placed second in the HPCG benchmark, which focuses more on system-level performance than Linpack, with 14.05 HPCG-Pflops. The AMD-powered LUMI took second place with 3.41 HPCG-Pflops, while Fugaku retained its top spot with 16 HPCG-Pflops. 

AMD's continued push into the upper ranks of the Top 500, Green 500, HPCG, and HLP-MXP benchmarks, and its share of the new systems, highlights that its CPUs have a performance advantage over competing entrants from Intel. As we have repeatedly seen, the trends and technology in the Top 500 tend to bleed down to the broader data center market, painting a promising picture for AMD's EPYC server chips over the next year. 

Up next for AMD? The 2-exaflop El Capitan supercomputer that is projected to take the #1 spot from Frontier. This system will be powered by AMD's revolutionary Instinct MI300 silicon that blends CPUs and GPUs into the same processor package to forge an exascale APU. That system is due to be operational in late 2023. 

Paul Alcorn
Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech

Paul Alcorn is the Managing Editor: News and Emerging Tech for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • Amdlova
    Last news I see from it has too many problems... maybe now it's working...
    https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/340136-amd-powered-exascale-supercomputer-has-a-system-failure-every-few-hours
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    AMD must've gotten their <Mod Edit> stuff together and got it working with the team that runs Frontier.
    Reply
  • phitinh81
    There's just something about AMD's hardwares that keep improving its performance after actually running. Aged like fine wine.
    Reply
  • helper800
    Amdlova said:
    Last news I see from it has too many problems... maybe now it's working...
    https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/340136-amd-powered-exascale-supercomputer-has-a-system-failure-every-few-hours
    Most super computers experience failures like this. when you have millions of CPU cores and thousands of miles of cables, the odds of something breaking when in use jumps up dramatically.
    Reply
  • Firestone
    the first compute servers I used over a decade ago were powered by AMD Opterons. Intel fanboys had fits back then over it, yet we still got more work done for more users our system than their Intel equivalents. Nice to see the rest of the compute space slowly catching up.
    Reply
  • Elusive Ruse
    Amdlova said:
    Last news I see from it has too many problems... maybe now it's working...
    https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/340136-amd-powered-exascale-supercomputer-has-a-system-failure-every-few-hours
    Salty :ROFLMAO:
    Reply
  • JayNor
    No love for the NVDA + Intel Ice Lake Xeon system that is at the top of the Green 500 list?

    The Flatiron Institute’s Henri system ... retained the top spot.
    Reply
  • JayNor
    The Aurora system configuration was updated to 63744 GPUs at ISC 2023. The PVC GPU was listed as 52TF FP64. Anyone have a calculator? Even without the SPR-HBM contribution, looks like peaks of over 3EF are possible. True, that would be > 2EF.
    Reply
  • helper800
    JayNor said:
    The Aurora system configuration was updated to 63744 GPUs at ISC 2023. The PVC GPU was listed as 52TF FP64. Anyone have a calculator? Even without the SPR-HBM contribution, looks like peaks of over 3EF are possible. True, that would be > 2EF.
    I guess we will find out if or when they get it up and running.
    Reply