Industry Sources Claim AMD Changed Naming Scheme For 45nm

According to industry sources, AMD has decided to modify the naming scheme for their 45nm desktop processors. While AMD is keeping the Phenom X3 and Phenom X4 branding, the model numbers have changed from four digits to five digits in length.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
  • starhoof
    i just wonder, when are they going to produce faster clocked phenoms?
    they would sure increase their sales if they were faster clocked...
    Reply
  • chaohsiangchen
    No triple core 45nm with DDR2 IMC?
    Reply
  • Pei-chen
    Give me a 2.0GHz BE for $120 and I'll OC it to 3.6GHZ. Hopefully the 45nm can match Q6600 clock for clock because I just cancelled a Q6600 order from Newegg to wait for the 45nm or price-dropped Q9x50.
    Reply
  • wavebossa
    Starhoofi just wonder, when are they going to produce faster clocked phenoms?they would sure increase their sales if they were faster clocked...
    Umm, you do realize that 3.0GHz is a faster clocked phenom by 400mhz right? And you do realize that this table tells you when they come out.

    The answer to your question can be found by actually reading the article.
    Reply
  • kitsilencer
    Nothing earthshattering here. But it's a step in the right direction.
    Reply
  • gwolfman
    Phenom X4 20x00 2.8GHz 4.0GHz* DDR3-1333 8MB TBD Q1 2009
    I read "TBD" and read/thought "TLB" erratum. LOL
    Reply
  • Hm. Maybe they could have used the X prefix for the numbers like ATI did when they first started going 'Over 9000!!!!!' ? I must admit, trying to pronounce 20550 without it sounding like 2550 is practically impossible. Maybe twenty-fifty-five-zero? Either way, I'll be picking up at least one of those, slotting it into an M3A79-T Deluxe, and making yet another all-AMD build. Will end up figuring on an AM3 build sometime in '09, likely, and pass on the M3A79 build to someone else in the family like I plan for my current build.
    Reply
  • wavebossa
    ^^ To be honest, I thought the X preceding the model number was the only obvious choice. 5 numbers is too much.
    Reply
  • doomsdaydave11
    8MB cache... definately a step up from
    Reply
  • hellwig
    I was kinda hoping AM3 would have dual-memory support, but I think the timing is off. When AMD released AM2, DDR2 was brand new and really expensive. By the time AMD releases AM3, DDR3 will be over a year old and much cheaper comparatively. I suppose AMD rightfully doesn't see any need for supporting DDR2 (especially since Intel has already stopped official support of it). I guess this means AM3 processors will also not work with AM2+/AM2 sockets. Looks like AMD got a little over-ambitious.

    What is also concerning is that they will still be making 125W processors on a 45nm architecture. Is there a problem with Phenom that they can't get the temps down?
    Reply