AMD Reportedly Discontinues Navi 23: No More Radeon RX 6600-Series

Radeon RX 7600
(Image credit: AMD)

Now that AMD's Radeon RX 7000-series product lineup is complete and all RDNA 3-based graphics processors have been announced or released, it's reportedly time for the company's previous-generation graphics cards and GPUs to go. Apparently, AMD wasted no time and discontinued its Navi 23 graphics chip that powers Radeon RX 6600-series products, reports IT Home, citing a forum specializing in the video cards business.

"AMD factory has stopped production for a certain GPU," a claim at the specialized forum reads. "By present, shipments from all AIB brands have stopped with inventory being cleared. AMD has stopped production for the Radeon RX 6650 XT, and nearly all brands will have their inventory cleared by the end of September."

Keep in mind that while AMD has reasons to halt production of previous-generation GPUs now that its new Navi 33 graphics processor and Radeon RX 7600 graphics cards (which are among the best graphics cards around) are in full production, the company has never confirmed this officially, so take the information with a grain of salt.

AMD's Navi 23 GPU is comprised of 11 billion transistors, packs 2048 stream processors, 32MB of Infinity Cache, and has a 128-bit memory interface. The chip is used for AMD's Radeon RX 6600, RX 6600 XT, and RX 6650 XT graphics cards. While AMD has reportedly stopped production of only the full Radeon RX 6650 XT configuration, based on the fact that both Radeon RX 6600 and RX 6600 XT are not really widespread in the U.S. retail these days, it's reasonable to assume that production of Navi 23 GPUs and Radeon RX 6600-series graphic cards has been halted.

In fact, there is hardly any point for AMD to continue production of Navi 23. The company's RDNA 3-based Navi 33 GPU integrates 13.3 billion transistors, has 2048 SPs, and performs better than its direct predecessor. Meanwhile, it has a smaller die size (204 mm2 vs 237 mm2) and is made on TSMC's N6 process technology (as opposed to N7 in the case of Navi 23), so it may well be cheaper to produce.

TOPICS
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • edzieba
    Meanwhile, has a smaller die size (204 mm2 vs 237 mm2) and is made on TSMC's N6 process technology (as opposed to N7 in the case of Navi 23), so it may well be cheaper to produce.
    Since 22nm, cost-per-unit-die-area has been going up rather than down, and for the last few nodes cost-per-unit-area has gone up VERY sharply. Cost-per-transistor has effectively plateaued to slightly increased (cost/gate has slightly reduced, but due to multiple gates per transistor becoming the norm rather than the exception for high speed transistors such as those in CVPUs and GPUs this is blunted). New processes offer improvements in energy efficiency, maximum overall performance (more transistors per die when you are reticule limited), and clock speeds, and (when mature enough to drop defect areal rates to parity with past nodes) offer greater die throughput via more dies per wafer in scenarios where wafer rate is the limit and demand exceeds supply - such as now.
    But the idea of "newer node means cheaper chips" has been dead for quite some time.
    Reply
  • JarredWaltonGPU
    edzieba said:
    Since 22nm, cost-per-unit-die-area has been going up rather than down, and for the last few nodes cost-per-unit-area has gone up VERY sharply. Cost-per-transistor has effectively plateaued to slightly increased (cost/gate has slightly reduced, but due to multiple gates per transistor becoming the norm rather than the exception for high speed transistors such as those in CVPUs and GPUs this is blunted). New processes offer improvements in energy efficiency, maximum overall performance (more transistors per die when you are reticule limited), and clock speeds, and (when mature enough to drop defect areal rates to parity with past nodes) offer greater die throughput via more dies per wafer in scenarios where wafer rate is the limit and demand exceeds supply - such as now.
    But the idea of "newer node means cheaper chips" has been dead for quite some time.
    N6 is just refined N7, though, and while we don't have detailed information on precisely how much TSMC charges for the various nodes, N6 and N7 should be pretty close. N5 and N7 meanwhile are a big gap in cost. This was the whole reason for GPU chiplets in the higher performance RDNA 3 range.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    RX 7600 exists now, so it makes sense for AMD to wind down on RX 6600
    Reply
  • renz496
    because they did not want to sell cards that have price lower than $200.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    Isn't it too early? I mean, there's nothing RDNA3 below the RX 6650 XT, so inventories are probably high and can keep sales of cheaper cards until the RX 7500 arrives.

    Also, by shutting down the 66xx chips, it's probably a safe bet that the next budget cards will have RDNA3, not rebrands (not a bad idea, at least better than the RX 6500 XT).
    Reply
  • Flayed
    I wouldn't hold your breath for RX 7500 as it sounds like AMD think their RDNA 3 lineup is complete.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    salgado18 said:
    so inventories are probably high and can keep sales of cheaper cards until the RX 7500 arrives.
    I don't think they plan on making a RX 7500.

    AMD Radeon Chief confirms Radeon RX 7000 (RDNA3) portfolio “is now complete”
    renz496 said:
    because they did not want to sell cards that have price lower than $200.
    Eventually, APU's with larger iGPU's will take the price & performance class for the RX 7500 if you're in the market for level of performance.
    Reply
  • mitch074
    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    I don't think they plan on making a RX 7500.

    AMD Radeon Chief confirms Radeon RX 7000 (RDNA3) portfolio “is now complete”
    Eventually, APU's with larger iGPU's will take the price & performance class for the RX 7500 if you're in the market for level of performance.
    Even the 6500XT and the 6400 were "emergency" products that came out because there were no cheap GPUs on the market - these were originally mobile chips bolted on a PCB, and were decried for being feature-less and underperforming on PCIe 3.0. I mean, in many cases its predecessor the RX5500 was actually faster !
    So no, I don't think we'll ever see a RX7500 - to me, the only chance there is of seeing such a GPU is if Navi 33 has a high failure rate and AMD want to sell cut-down GPUs, but that would be really surprising.
    Reply