AMD's Ryzen 7000 (Raphael) processors may be around the corner. However, the chipmaker isn't ready to retire the Ryzen 5000G (Cezanne) lineup. In the shape of the Ryzen 7 5700, an unreleased chip has emerged in the wild.
At first glance, the Ryzen 7 5700 looks like an iteration of the Ryzen 7 5700X or Ryzen 7 5700G. The Geekbench 5 submission (via Benchleaks) detected the unannounced chip as part of AMD's Cezanne family, so it's theoretically a member of AMD's Ryzen 5000G family of APUs. The Ryzen 7 5700 features the same formula as the Ryzen 7 5700G. The chip has eight Zen 3 cores with simultaneous multithreading (SMT) and 16MB of L3 cache. The clock speeds are different, though.
While the Ryzen 7 5700G has a 3.8 GHz base clock, the Ryzen 7 5700 seems to sport a 100 MHz slower base clock. In the Geekbench 5 run, the Ryzen 7 5700 averaged 4,617 MHz, which falls in line with the Ryzen 7 5700G's official 4.6 GHz boost clock. However, the biggest differentiator between the Ryzen 7 5700G and the Ryzen 7 5700 is that the latter lacks integrated graphics.
If you're familiar with AMD's terminology, the company uses the "G" suffix to denote products with integrated graphics. Therefore, the Ryzen 7 5700 doesn't have the Radeon Vega graphics engine at its disposal. It explains why the octa-core chip tapped Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3060 (Ampere) graphics card in the Geekbench 5 benchmark.
AMD Ryzen 7 5700 Specifications
CPU | Cores / Threads | Base / Boost Clock (GHz) | Graphics Cores | Graphics Frequency (MHz) | TDP (W) | L3 Cache (MB) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryzen 7 5700X | 8 / 16 | 3.4 / 4.6 | N/A | N/A | 65 | 32 |
Ryzen 7 5700G | 8 / 16 | 3.8 / 4.6 | RX Vega 8 | 2,000 | 65 | 16 |
Ryzen 7 5700 | 8 / 16 | 3.7 / 4.6 | N/A | N/A | 65 | 16 |
The Ryzen 7 5700 scored 1,546 points in the single-core test and 8,502 points in the multi-core test. Based on our tests, the Ryzen 7 5700G achieved 1,547 points and 9,032 points in the same tests. The single-core performance between the two processors was similar. However, the Ryzen 7 5700G delivered up to 6% higher multi-core performance.
The way it looks is that the Ryzen 7 5700 is the iGPU-less variant of the Ryzen 7 5700G with a slightly lower base clock. The performance is nearly identical to the Ryzen 7 5700G, which has a slight advantage in multi-threaded workloads. It's plausible that the Ryzen 7 5700 is an offshoot of the Ryzen 7 5700G, utilizing defective silicon that doesn't qualify for the latter. It's a clever way to maximize every bit of 7 nm silicon TSMC produces for AMD.
It's uncertain if the Ryzen 7 5700 is an OEM processor or if AMD will release it to the retail market. The Ryzen 7 5700G debuted at $359 but currently sells for $289. It'd be interesting to see how AMD prices the Ryzen 7 5700 since it's technically no longer an APU, losing the part of its essence that makes it attractive. To make the situation even more complicated, the Ryzen 7 5700X retails for $286.98, so it's a good option for consumers who want an eight-core, 16-thread Zen 3 65W chip and don't need integrated graphics. Unfortunately, the Ryzen 7 5700 will have a hard time finding its place in the DIY market unless AMD sells it for dirt cheap.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Zhiye Liu is a news editor and memory reviewer at Tom’s Hardware. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
-
artk2219 I feel like AMD needs to adopt the F suffix for CPU's like this, the Ryzen 7 5700F, itd probably be pretty solidly priced around the $199 mark, if they just want them gone then a price south of $180 should do the trick, i wonder how it stacks up against a 3700X.Reply -
digitalgriffin Admin said:Hardware detective discovers an unreleased AMD Ryzen 7 5700 processor from a Geekbench 5 submission.
AMD's Ryzen 7 5700 Emerges Without Radeon Vega iGPU : Read more
Dirt cheap defective dies are more money than the recycling bin. I would have to see specs, but I would imagine it would slot in between a 3600 and 3600X mainly due because of the lost cache. But this depends on workload. -
Foxlum This is definitely better for a business, but it's extremely unfortunate the G series doesn't do PCI 4, including these iGPU disabled chips. Making AMDs lineup of low-end Rx 6400 and 6500 XTs unfortunately more performance limited.Reply