New Asus ROG Ally Model Confirms AMD's Z1 Is Much Slower Than Z1 Extreme

ROG Ally
(Image credit: Asus)

Asus has provided benchmark numbers for its new ROG Ally model featuring AMD's hexa-core Ryzen Z1 handled gaming SoC. The benchmarks confirm that the wide spec differences between the Z1 and Z1 extreme impact real-world performance, with the Z1 Extreme variant of the ROG Ally performing substantially better than the Ally sporting the vanilla Ryzen Z1 chip.

Asus benchmarked both ROG Ally variants (featuring the Ryzen Z1 and Z1 Extreme) in several AAA titles, including Elden Ring, FIFA 23, Cuberypunk 2077, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, Forza Horizon 5, and Diablo 4 at 1080P and 720P. At 1080P resolution, the ROG Ally with the Z1 Extreme was averaging 30% greater performance in all five titles, with frame rate margins as high as 35FPS in the case of Modern Warfare 2.

(Image credit: Asus)

(Image credit: Asus)

At 720P, Asus added Red Dead Redemption 2 into the testing pool, alongside the other six titles. On average, The Z1 Extreme-powered ROG Ally was 24% faster than the Ryzen Z1 variant, with frame rate gaps as high as 27FPS in Modern Warfare 2.

The performance variances are pretty large between the two SKUs, but the good news is that Asus' lower-end ROG Ally with the Z1 non-Extreme was still able to stay above 30FPS in all games tested at 1080P, and above 40FPS at 720P. 

AMD's Ryzen Z1-series CPUs represent its first foray into the handheld gaming SoC market, in competition with the Steam Deck. The new chips are custom-tuned variants of AMD's 7040-series Phoenix mobile CPUs, featuring more optimized V/F curves designed for handheld gaming PCs. The Ryzen Z1 Extreme is the flagship SKU, offering 8 Zen 4 cores, 16 threads, a 5.1GHz boost clock, 24MB of cache and 12 RDNA 3 compute units. The Ryzen Z1 is AMD's lower-end model, sporting six Zen 4 cores, 12 threads, a 4.9GHz boost clock, 22MB of cache and just four RDNA3 compute units

The Ryzen Z1's substantially hobbled graphics unit explains why the chip is so much slower compared to the Z1 Extreme. However, Asus only tested the chips at their 30W TDPs and not at lower TDPs, like 15W. If previous benchmarks are anything to go by, the Ryzen Z1 excels at lower power envelopes, which could make it a decent offering for gamers who care more about battery life than performance.

The new Ryzen Z1 ROG Ally variant is available now at Best Buy for $599.99, making it $100 cheaper than the Z1 Extreme variant.

Aaron Klotz
Freelance News Writer

Aaron Klotz is a freelance writer for Tom’s Hardware US, covering news topics related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    15% lower cost for 30% less performance. What a deal!
    Reply
  • mcmlai
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    15% lower cost for 30% less performance. What a deal!
    Well, depends how you word it. 15% more will get you 30% more performance. That is a great deal!
    Reply
  • Sluggotg
    $700 vs $600, I would just spend the extra 100. There is a significant difference in performance. If you can afford a luxury item like this, the extra 100 should be doable. I always like Asus! One of the better computer parts companies.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    But what about battery duration? It only makes sense if the Z1 lasts a lot longer. I'd get one if it lasted a lot more with one charge, but if it lasts almost the same, then the Z1 version is a bad product (or just too expensive)
    Reply
  • jk47_99
    This seems to follow the same strategy as graphics cards. The "cheaper" model is just there to upsell to the more expensive one, until it will obviously drop in price once enough of the top model has sold.
    Reply
  • AgentBirdnest
    Is anyone else surprised/confused that the Z1 Extreme has 200% more CUs, but only 30% more performance?
    Reply
  • Amdlova
    I will wait for the switch 2 :) asus things don't have good support. When come a new one of these the old one goes to the bin.
    Reply
  • Phaaze88
    The performance metric is an average though, so depending on what the user will play, it could be higher(good) or lower(bad) than that. The price difference is what it is.
    Great deal? ~Ehh, looks pretty 'meh' to me.
    Reply
  • George³
    AgentBirdnest said:
    Is anyone else surprised/confused that the Z1 Extreme has 200% more CUs, but only 30% more performance?
    RAM speed is bottleneck. No surprise.
    Reply
  • jeremyj_83
    AgentBirdnest said:
    Is anyone else surprised/confused that the Z1 Extreme has 200% more CUs, but only 30% more performance?
    This isn't surprising at all. Even though the Extreme has a lot more GPU resources, it is held back by RAM bandwidth. If it has dedicated GDDR6 then it would be much faster.
    Reply