Benchmarks Reveal Six-Core Ryzen Z1 Is Optimized for 15W Gaming

AMD Ryzen Z1 processor
(Image credit: AMD)

After months of waiting, benchmarks of AMD's vanilla Ryzen Z1 chip have finally surfaced, giving us some insight into the chip's performance before we see it appear in handhelds later this year like the ROG Ally. We first heard about the APU back in May, alongside the Z1 Extreme, as gaming-optimized mobile APUs designed for handheld gaming PCs, but only the Z1 Extreme was in reviewed systems.

Now, in a review published by David Huang on Zhulanlan using an unnamed gaming handheld, we've learned that that the Z1 excels specifically at low-TDP gaming featuring power ratings around 15W. At 15W, the chip is extremely efficient, featuring vastly superior performance per watt compared to the Ryzen 7 7840U at 25W. Huang 

The Z1 and Z1 Extreme are based on AMD's Ryzen 7040 class of mobile CPUs, featuring the same Zen 4 CPU cores and RDNA3 iGPs. Both chips feature a 9W-30W configurable TDP. The Z1 Extreme offers 8 cores, 16 threads, a peak boost clock of 5.1 GHz, and 12 RDNA 3 CUs, while the vanilla Ryzen Z1 features 6 cores, 12 threads, a 4.9GHz boost clock and just four RDNA3 CUs.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • -Fran-
    You know... The Z1 wouldn't be such a polarizing APU (to me at least) if it had all the CUs and just lose those 2 cores. I could even accept lower clocks to go with that, but keep all the CUs. Hell, make it a 4 core and keep all the CUs and I would still think it's a great APU for handhelds. And yes, this is an exclusive comment for handhelds. Ultra-portables in the form of laptops more often than not do not care about graphical prowess.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    -Fran- said:
    You know... The Z1 wouldn't be such a polarizing APU (to me at least) if it had all the CUs and just lose those 2 cores. I could even accept lower clocks to go with that, but keep all the CUs. Hell, make it a 4 core and keep all the CUs and I would still think it's a great APU for handhelds. And yes, this is an exclusive comment for handhelds. Ultra-portables in the form of laptops more often than not do not care about graphical prowess.

    Regards.
    Maybe in the future, they'll design chips exclusively for handhelds and mobile gaming devices. I think it is like that to make a jack-of-all-trades chip, because gaming handheld market is not big enough. But yes, I'd like that too.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    salgado18 said:
    Maybe in the future, they'll design chips exclusively for handhelds and mobile gaming devices. I think it is like that to make a jack-of-all-trades chip, because gaming handheld market is not big enough. But yes, I'd like that too.
    I mean, in all honestly, their APUs are now exclusively made for mobile (handheld or not), so it kind of is already a thing, maybe?

    The desktop APUs are more like higher TDP models of the mobile APUs and now that they've added a 2CU iGPU into their desktop models, I'd be willing to say they'll be trying to put less APUs on the desktop side now which are "high performance". Well, this is being extremely generous with the 5700G :P

    Regards.
    Reply