AV1 Update Reduces CPU Encoding Times By Up To 34 Percent

AOMedia
(Image credit: AOMedia)

According to Phoronix, Google has released a new AOM-AV1 update - version 3.5, that drastically improves encode times when streaming, rendering, or recording from the CPU. At its best, the update can improve encoding times by up to 34%. 

It is a fantastic addition to AV1's capabilities, with the encoder becoming very popular among powerful video platforms such as YouTube. In addition, we are also seeing significant support for AV1 hardware acceleration on modern discrete GPUs now, such as Intel's Arc Alchemist GPUs and, most importantly - Nvidia's RTX 40-series GPUs.

Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • -Fran-
    Oh, you know this makes me happy, LOL.

    I'll test it as soon as OBS gets it.

    Regards xD
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    I'm still rooting for H.266 VVC.
    Reply
  • dk382
    Kamen Rider Blade said:
    I'm still rooting for H.266 VVC.
    VVC will be useful for video archival, and maybe some streaming services will use it, but AV1 will be the codec of choice for streaming and youtube since it's faster, free, and funded by google.
    Reply
  • Kamen Rider Blade
    dk382 said:
    VVC will be useful for video archival, and maybe some streaming services will use it, but AV1 will be the codec of choice for streaming and youtube since it's faster, free, and funded by google.
    Let's be honest, the Free & Funded by Google is the main reason they'll be using it.
    They want to avoid paying any form of payments / royalties to MPEG.
    Reply
  • RedBear87
    dk382 said:
    VVC will be useful for video archival, and maybe some streaming services will use it, but AV1 will be the codec of choice for streaming and youtube since it's faster, free, and funded by google.
    Broadcasting is probably going to use VVC as well, early this year in February DVB approved VVC as its next generation video codec, while AV1 is still under review.
    Reply
  • TechyInAZ
    -Fran- said:
    Oh, you know this makes me happy, LOL.

    I'll test it as soon as OBS gets it.

    Regards xD

    Oh I know you are! 🤣
    Reply
  • TheOtherOne
    Comparing the difference with two decades older tech just to brag it's 50% more efficient! Where is the comparison to h265? 🤨¯\(ツ)/¯
    Reply
  • mitch074
    TheOtherOne said:
    Comparing the difference with two decades older tech just to brag it's 50% more efficient! Where is the comparison to h265? 🤨¯\(ツ)/¯
    HEVC is on par with VP9 - AV1's predecessor in the open source world. Theoretically, AV1 is thus 30% more efficient than HEVC, but has a high cost in encoding processing power. A 34% reduction in encoding time on software solutions means that the only advantage HEVC had is shrinking. Coupled with hardware encoders in Nvidia and Intel GPUs, HEVC is less and less appealing.
    Now if AMD could add AV1 encoding in its chips...
    Reply
  • ThatMouse
    AV1 must be new, because YouTube encodes in VP9 mostly. Most YouTube creators use HVEC/.265 at really high bit rates because YouTube re-compresses it. Are we all going to be encoding in AV1 then?
    Reply
  • Tex61
    ThatMouse said:
    AV1 must be new, because YouTube encodes in VP9 mostly. Most YouTube creators use HVEC/.265 at really high bit rates because YouTube re-compresses it. Are we all going to be encoding in AV1 then?

    In 2018, YouTube began rolling out AV1.....

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AV1#Content_providers
    Reply