DirectStorage Testing Shows PCIe 3 SSDs Are Basically as Fast as PCIe 5

Solid-state drives with different PCIe interfaces tend to deliver very different performance times in typical applications under high workloads, due to bandwidth constraints. But it looks like the difference between PCIe Gen3 and PCIe Gen5 drives may not be that significant with DirectStorage, according to load times from a built-in Forspoken benchmark by Compusemble.  

There are two key advantages that Microsoft's DirectStorage 1.1 application programming interface brings to games: faster load times, aided by asset compression/decompression algorithms handled by the SSD controller and GPU that enable them to transfer more data than the storage medium is normally capable of, as well as reduction of CPU load when dealing with NVMe requests, which allows for faster and more efficient transfer of assets from storage to the graphics subsystem. 

We already know that DirectStorage can greatly alleviate data transfer rates of solid state drives, even for SSDs with a SATA interface. This reduces load times, and it also raises the question of whether SSDs with different interfaces will deliver different experiences in DirectStorage-enabled games. As it turns out — not really. 

ssd

(Image credit: Compusemble/YouTube)

Load times in Forspoken are greatly reduced, so even when you combine the load times of seven different levels/scenes in the built-in benchmark, the difference between an advanced Phison E26-based SSD (the controller that will power the best SSDs this season) with a PCIe Gen5 x4 interface and a mature Adata XPG SX8200 Pro with a PCIe Gen3 x4 interface is a negligible three seconds.  

On paper this means that the PCIe Gen3 drive is 32% slower than a PCIe Gen5 SSD, but in reality the difference is unnoticeable across seven scenes. Meanwhile, raw data throughput supported by a PCIe 5.0 x4 interface is about four times higher compared to a PCIe 3.0 x4 interface. So DirectStorage compression not only works, it also blurs the line between different SSDs. 

Of course, there's only one game that supports Microsoft DirectStorage today, so it still makes sense to get a PCIe Gen5 x4 drive for a new build. But the good news is, once DirectStorage gains traction, that SSD is likely to perform on par with the next generation of drives in games.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

Read more
Micron 4600 PCIe Gen 5 NVMe Ciient SSD
Micron introduces 4600 PCIe Gen 5 NVMe client SSD, promises lower AI load times
An image of the revamped 2024 SanDisk logo on red background.
Sandisk's upcoming PCIe 5.0 SSD fights throttling with 7W power
Samsung 9100 Pro
Samsung's 9100 Pro SSD boasts 14.8 GB/s read speeds, making it the world's fastest consumer drive
Astera Labs testbench holding Micron's PCIe 6.0 SSDs.
Micron shows off world's fastest PCIe 6.0 SSD, hitting 27 GB/s speeds — Astera Labs PCIe 6.0 switch enables impressive sequential reads
Best PS5 SSDs
The Best PS5 SSDs in 2025: Speedy NVMe storage for your console
Phison's PS5028-E28 SSD controller
Phison unveils next-generation high-end PCIe 5.0 SSD platform: PS5028-E28
Latest in SSDs
4TB SSD Deals
4TB SSDs now 5 cents per GB, Samsung drives on Sale
Seagate SSD
Newegg is selling this speedy 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD at 6 cents per GB
Kioxia LC9 123TB SSD
Kioxia shows off new 122.88 TB SSD — PCIe 5.0 LC9 packs a whole lot of QLC NAND
Crucial T705 SSD
Crucial's superfast 2TB T705 Gen 5 SSD is back down to its lowest-ever price — Grab one of these drives for the ultimate gaming PC build
Samsung 9100 Pro SSD
Samsung 9100 Pro SSD Review: Samsung’s Capable Answer to Phison’s Storage Gauntlet
Corsair E400U
Corsair EX400U review: Game-changing USB4 speed in a magnetic, phone-friendly form factor
Latest in News
RX 9070 XT Sapphire
Lisa Su says Radeon RX 9070-series GPU sales are 10X higher than its predecessors — for the first week of availability
RTX 5070, RX 9070 XT, Arc B580
Real-world GPU prices cost up to twice the MSRP — a look at current FPS per dollar values
Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 5090 AMP Extreme Infinity
Zotac raises RTX 5090 prices by 20% and seemingly eliminates MSRP models
ASRock fixes AM5 motherboard by cleaning it
ASRock claims to fix 'burned out' AM5 motherboard by cleaning the socket
ChatGPT Security
Some ChatGPT users are addicted and will suffer withdrawal symptoms if cut off, say researchers
project-g-assist-nvidia-geforce-rtx-ogimage
Nvidia releases public G-Assist in latest App to provide in-game AI assistance — also introduces DLSS custom scaling factors
  • PlaneInTheSky
    Note that a lot of benefits found in DirectStorage have little to do with the speed of the SSD.

    A lot of changes in Directstorage 1.0 are about software overhead when the GPU has to access assets. You can notice these benefits even when using SATA SSD.

    And the major change in DirecStorage 1.1 is GDeflate , that uses the GPU instead of the CPU to decompress assets like textures and shaders. While you do need a regular NVMe SSD to be able to get all those assets to the GPU in a timely manner, a PCIe 3.0 SSD works just fine. The real cut in loading times is due to the GPU doing the decompression instead of the GPU.

    The reason why a game won't load instantly yet, even with DirectStorage 1.1, has nothing to do with hardware anymore. They're largely network calls, to DRM servers, Denuvo bloat, etc.
    Reply
  • tennis2
    No baseline results? What's the load time WITHOUT directstorage enabled?
    Reply
  • PlaneInTheSky
    No baseline results? What's the load time WITHOUT directstorage enabled?

    DirectStorage cuts loading times in Forspoken by about 36% on average.

    Significant, but not earth-shattering either. Forspoken also uses Denuvo, which we know impacts loading times in games, and DirectStorage has no effect on that.

    Reply
  • tennis2
    ^ that chart is using a Samsung 990 Pro (PCIe4.0).

    Just so people can compare/extrapolate if they want.
    Reply
  • AgentBirdnest
    The sample size of DirectStorage games is one, and that game is about as optimized as a plate of spaghetti.
    Probably not a great idea to make DirectStorage conclusions based on this one game, alone.
    Reply
  • CRamseyer
    The built in benchmark doesn't take into account longterm gameplay where the same files are read thousands of time per hour. Not only that, the game doesn't use GDeflate.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    so it still makes sense to get a PCIe Gen5 x4 drive for a new build.

    why?
    if the performance is a mere3seconds load...save $ and get cheaper, larger capacity drive.

    might even not need a high end MB since pcie gen 5 has little use now (not even gpu can use all of gen4)
    Reply
  • RichardtST
    So... If the speed of the drive matters very little, but DS being on or off matters roughly 35-50%, that would imply that the interface is mostly avoiding a bunch of software bloat. And there is only so much bloat that Windows will allow you to remove. Perhaps attach the storage directly to the GPU with a small coprocessor running a stripped little file-access-oriented OS? Remove the problem (Windows) completely. That would be a cool little project!
    Reply
  • tamalero
    PlaneInTheSky said:
    DirectStorage cuts loading times in Forspoken by about 36% on average.

    Significant, but not earth-shattering either. Forspoken also uses Denuvo, which we know impacts loading times in games, and DirectStorage has no effect on that.

    I'm sorry but getting a 36% loading boost on average with no additional expenses or changes to hardware is def worth every bit of it. "Not Earth shattering" XD
    If they can make the scenes load almost instantly, its worth it for seamless gameplay.
    Reply
  • Fates_Demise
    hotaru251 said:
    why?
    if the performance is a mere3seconds load...save $ and get cheaper, larger capacity drive.

    might even not need a high end MB since pcie gen 5 has little use now (not even gpu can use all of gen4)

    It's 3 seconds for that game, games 5 years from not might be 30 seconds+. Future proof your build if the price is justified.
    Reply