Many Ethereum Miners Likely Lost Money During the Past Two Years

YouTube YouTube
Watch On
Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Jarred Walton
Senior Editor

Jarred Walton is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on everything GPU. He has been working as a tech journalist since 2004, writing for AnandTech, Maximum PC, and PC Gamer. From the first S3 Virge '3D decelerators' to today's GPUs, Jarred keeps up with all the latest graphics trends and is the one to ask about game performance.

  • Allen_B
    My tears, they are blinding.

    Seriously, the more people lose money on this environment-damaging, useless scheme that is cryptocurrency, the sooner it will go away.
    Reply
  • King_V
    Maybe this makes me a terrible person, but...

    Reply
  • BX4096
    King_V said:
    Maybe this makes me a terrible person, but...

    Why would that make you a terrible person? Planet-destroying cryptoparasites deserve all the scorn in the world, as far as I'm concerned. Time to get a real job, you bums.

    Cambridge University Study: Blockchain and crypto fads like NFTs are good for business, bad for our planet.
    Reply
  • Thunder64
    I'm OK with this.
    Reply
  • Gam3r01
    BX4096 said:
    Why would that make you a terrible person? Planet-destroying cryptoparasites deserve all the scorn in the world, as far as I'm concerned. Time to get a real job, you bums.

    Cambridge University Study: Blockchain and crypto fads like NFTs are good for business, bad for our planet.
    Environmental Scientist here:

    While I agree that something like this, a pointless consumption of energy (mostly non-renewable) is, well, pointless and bad for the environment, your linked article is clickbait and supported by some severely lacking "scientific" documents.

    For example, they reference an article from Nature, that claims "Bitcoin emissions alone could push global warming above 2°C ", yet in their own data sets they show in the last ~150yrs global temperatures have risen (on average) .9C, due to ~584GtC emissions. They then go on to state ~49MtC were emitted from coin mining in 2017, that would mean it would take over a thousand years for mining to raise temperatures by 1C, let alone 2C.

    They then go on to try and justify this by stating, by the year 2040, bitcoin mining on the scale of emissions we see now will be adopted globally, by most of the population, at the same rate as innovations such as credit cards, dishwashers, and electricity itself. Their entire argument is contingent on 50-95% of the global population owning mining farms, according to their graph analysis.

    Im all for supporting environmental policies and more effective and cleaner energy models, but this is just poor journalism and downright bad research.
    Do not mistake this for supporting coin mining etc, It is absolutely a waste of resources, but these "news" outlets should at least make some credible points against it first.
    Reply
  • Yebemather
    Reply
  • Makaveli
    Reply
  • ssj3rd
    A good day to be alive!
    Reply
  • BX4096
    Gam3r01 said:
    Environmental Scientist here:

    While I agree that something like this, a pointless consumption of energy (mostly non-renewable) is, well, pointless and bad for the environment, your linked article is clickbait and supported by some severely lacking "scientific" documents.
    ...
    Do not mistake this for supporting coin mining etc, It is absolutely a waste of resources, but these "news" outlets should at least make some credible points against it first.

    While I definitely appreciate the correction (the link was just an example: I rarely read MSNBC and I haven't really followed this study), the fact remains that Bitcoin alone consumes 91 terawatt-hours of electricity annually (as of 2021)–more than is used by Finland, a nation of 5.5 million that ranks #36 by electricity consumption out of 200-plus nations and territories worldwide. And that's just Bitcoin.

    Bitcoin Devours More Electricity Than Many Countries
    While the exact levels of crypto mining's environmental impact may still be debated, the fact that it is absolutely negative is hardly in question.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    BX4096 said:
    Why would that make you a terrible person? Planet-destroying cryptoparasites deserve all the scorn in the world, as far as I'm concerned. Time to get a real job, you bums.

    Cambridge University Study: Blockchain and crypto fads like NFTs are good for business, bad for our planet.
    I'm sure people where saying that same thing to the first people that made gaming hardware, you are just wasting electricity and resources for no reason, we are still here some 70 years later (someone should figure out how much all the consoles/gaming PCs in the world burn per year) , or to the first people that created the internet/data centers, I'm sure google burns through tons of electricity "for nothing" so that you and I can do posts on forums.
    I don't know how long it's going to take but one cryptocurrency is going to prevail and it will be part of our future, there is a need and a use for it, it's only crazy now because it's basically the crypto-wars, it's the flip side of having too much competition in a field but just like everything else it will distill down to basically just one.
    Reply