Intel's Broadwell Core M Processor: New Details, SKUs and Specifics

15

Processor manufacturer Intel has released some details on its 4.5-Watt Core M CPU lineup today, including specific model numbers and bulk pricing. We know you're itching for the technical details, so let's go straight to the specifications:  

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Don Woligroski was a former senior hardware editor for Tom's Hardware. He has covered a wide range of PC hardware topics, including CPUs, GPUs, system building, and emerging technologies.

  • hannibal
    These seems to be perfect for Surface mini type tablets! More powerful that cheap Atom tablets, but you can use these in smaller than normal size Surface tablets.
    8" Surface pro with one of these would be really nice tablet!
    Reply
  • lp231
    My very first PC was a Pentium 3 and it also ran at 0.80GHz, which is basically 800MHz.
    Reply
  • dovah-chan
    I used to not think anything at all about power efficiency but after getting my laptop last year and flexing its battery, I've realized how much we need this. Really looking forward to seeing how far Intel can push their mobile lineup.
    Reply
  • gnarr
    "I'd like to touch on the elephant in the room: why is Intel pushing Windows tablets when the world doesn't seem to be all that interested in them?"
    Because no android tablets or iPads use x86 CPU's...
    Reply
  • hst101rox
    I wonder if there will be room in the cheap laptop market for both 14nm Atom and Broadwell-Y. Atom will probably mostly be about tablets and phones but who knows.

    Very interested in the high end laptop Broadwell chips! What clockspeeds will we see, will we see a 6 core laptop chip?
    Reply
  • sonofliberty08
    looks like Intel has learn a lot from the AMD APU, CPU power are no longer that important, GPU is the future
    Reply
  • agentbb007
    My very first PC was a Pentium 3 and it also ran at 0.80GHz, which is basically 800MHz.
    Lol there's a lot more to a CPU than the clock speed, hyper-threading, Instruction-set-extensions, newer manufacturing process for more powerful but cooler processors, more advanced architecture, gosh I could go on and on.
    Reply
  • Drejeck
    I just can't wait to see Broadwell for 1150, I can fit a Haswell T 35W TDP processor within 96W (PicoPSU 160XT) and a KFA2 750Ti but since I want the Impact VII motherboard there plenty of time to wait to build my gaming Nintento NES console/pc. I'm really getting excited and in hope to get the x86 part lower on TDP, the Haswell 35W is powerful enough to run a 750Ti at max details 1920x1080.
    Reply
  • CyranD
    I wonder how the SY70 will compare to a i5-4300U. Planning on buying a 2 in 1 around December. The 2 most likely candidates right now is the surface pro 3 with a I5-4300U and 8GB ram or the to be released Helix 2 which I am hopping there will be options for the SY70, 8GB ram and at least a 256GB SDD.
    Reply
  • ZolaIII
    Somehow now Nv's K1 64 bit looks even more compelling. Whit that price policy they won't sell any of those. Intel updated SIMD extensions on this new Y chips and then added a DSP. This is getting more & more ridiculous. Somehow Altera had most brains up to date pairing their FPGA's with cortexes A53. That should stand as future model to others. Base good enough core(s) & big enough programmable FPGA (possible usage defined).
    Reply