Intel's CEO Fires Back at 3nm Delay Rumors

A computer chip.
(Image credit: Shutterstock)
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • rluker5
    What are these rumors?
    Is this more MLD stuff?
    Reply
  • rluker5 said:
    What are these rumors?
    Is this more MLD stuff?

    You mean Moore's Law is Dead YT channel stuff/MLID rumors ? Or, some other thing ? Nope, these are not rumors by the way. Not by MLID though.

    It's a response/confirmation from Pat Gelsinger, chief executive of Intel, that they are on track with 3nm node, because recently DIGITIMES leaked out this rumor citing industry sources that Intel might delay it's 3nm orders, which was NOT true to begin with.
    Reply
  • MBOO7
    No offense, but trusting Pat is like trusting a liar. Look who cut the dividend suddenly (not to mention all those insider sales shortly before the announcement).
    Even (crappy) WCC has a better reputation than Pat.
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    Released in 2024? would that be the same kind of release the ARC GPU got when it first came out. A very quite and limited number somewhere in China?
    Reply
  • Giroro
    I think this is just all a bunch of CEO weaseling, since "Intel 3" is a deliberately-misleading rebrand of Intel's "5 nm class" process. Its performance/efficiency will be competitive with TSMC N5. "Intel 3" could be delayed or even cancelled without affecting "Intel's 3nm" and vice versa.

    Although I don't think Gelsinger actually cares what anybody thinks in regards to delays, just as long as he can continue tricking people into conflating Intel's generation-behind tech with TSMC's superior bleeding-edge.
    Reply
  • jamok99
    Gelsinger is such an unabashed liar, he probably wears asbestos pants to keep from getting continually singed. Intel hasn't been on time with many, if not most, of their important products since 2016, due to constant delays with perfecting their die shrinks. You know a company's in trouble when current promises turn to dust and the CEO focuses on future promises, which turn to dust when you arrive there.
    In particular, ""Good solid execution on both the client, the server, and AXG side. We are gaining momentum with foundry customers as well. So, I feel good that we have turned the corner on many of the execution challenges. You know, these rumors, like many others, will be proven by our execution to be firmly false."
    I recently read that Intel's program (can't recall the name of it) to lure customers to its own fabs (in an attempt to compete with TSMC), has resulted in exactly 1 contract to date. So that's what "gaining momentum with foundry customers as well" really means. Sheesh.
    If you want to see an immediate 'bump up' in Intel's stock price, fire Gelsinger and replace him with someone who's competence extends beyond just words.
    Reply
  • brandonjclark
    MBOO7 said:
    No offense, but trusting Pat is like trusting a liar. Look who cut the dividend suddenly (not to mention all those insider sales shortly before the announcement).
    Even (crappy) WCC has a better reputation than Pat.


    So, you're a big Intel fan, then?

    ;)
    Reply
  • rtoaht
    Giroro said:
    ...Its performance/efficiency will be competitive with TSMC N5...

    Any source for this statement other than "just trust me bro"?
    Reply
  • rtoaht
    MBOO7 said:
    No offense, but trusting Pat is like trusting a liar. Look who cut the dividend suddenly (not to mention all those insider sales shortly before the announcement).
    Even (crappy) WCC has a better reputation than Pat.

    In the Q4 2022, Intel CFO mentioned that Intel will offer "competitive dividend". They didn't promise they wouldn't reduce it at all. Which part is the lie?
    Reply
  • rtoaht
    brandonjclark said:
    So, you're a big Intel fan, then?

    ;)

    Very few billion dollars corporations have die-hard fans. There are few notable exceptions, however, like AMD or Tesla.
    Reply