Intel Charts Course to Trillion-Transistor Chips: 2D Transistor Materials, 3D Packaging Research

Intel released nine research papers at IEDM 2022 that lay the groundwork for future chip designs as the company looks to deliver on its promise of developing processors with over a trillion transistors by 2030.

The research includes new 2D materials for transistors, new 3D packaging technology that narrows the performance and power gap between chiplet and single-die processors to a nearly-imperceptible range, transistors that 'don't forget' when power is removed, and embedded memories that can be stacked directly on top of transistors and store more than one bit per cell, among other innovations.

Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • dehjomz
    Good to see Intel continuing to push the envelope in the future of CPUs...
    Reply
  • Geef
    Hearing things like this is great but I'm hoping there are places with actual printed paper data of how to do all this. I'd hate for an EMP blast to happen and wipe the entire planet out and we lose XX years of top tech like this.
    Reply
  • TechieTwo
    Geef said:
    Hearing things like this is great but I'm hoping there are places with actual printed paper data of how to do all this. I'd hate for an EMP blast to happen and wipe the entire planet out and we lose XX years of top tech like this.

    The paperless office ended 40 years ago... or at least it was suppose too.
    Reply
  • Geef said:
    Hearing things like this is great but I'm hoping there are places with actual printed paper data of how to do all this. I'd hate for an EMP blast to happen and wipe the entire planet out and we lose XX years of top tech like this.
    The kind of EMP blast you’re talking about would bring about way worse problems than this

    in other words, it would be cataclysmic, and you would have other things to worry about than this nonsense. like basic survival
    Reply
  • digitalgriffin
    Mandark said:
    The kind of EMP blast you’re talking about would bring about way worse problems than this

    in other words, it would be cataclysmic, and you would have other things to worry about than this nonsense. like basic survival
    No place on earth would be safe even in a limited war. Even if you could disregard nuclear winter, and ground + water contaminated with cesium and strontium, you would have to deal with likely dozens of nuclear power plants that likely melted down and had core failures because all methods of cooling them would also be destroyed. The cooling services are external to the containment building. Imagine Chernobyl except no emergency services left because infrastructure has been destroyed and entire area is a hot zone.

    It's not MAD. It's everyone and every creature suffers destruction.
    Reply
  • russell_john
    A pretty bold claim for a company that has struggled for years just to make 7nm work for them ......
    Reply
  • digitalgriffin
    russell_john said:
    A pretty bold claim for a company that has struggled for years just to make 7nm work for them ......

    It's like a jigsaw puzzle. You find all the edge pieces , put them in place then slowly fill them in. You have to start somewhere.
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    russell_john said:
    A pretty bold claim for a company that has struggled for years just to make 7nm work for them ......
    The only thing intel struggled with was making 14nm stop being profitable...

    They made so much money off the old tech that it would be crazy to come out with something new.
    Intel 7 isn't 7nm, it's 10nm, and even that they halve down and supplement with crappy small cpus and they still make all of the money.
    Reply
  • Wisecracker
    Pretty much this.
    See: IEDM 2018: Intel’s 10nm Standard Cell Library and Power Delivery
    3 Main Library Offerings
    Through considerable analysis, Intel arrived at three main logic library offerings – a high-density cell, a high-performance cell, and an ultra-high performance cell. All three libraries are 6T libraries, each with a custom-designed BEOL.
    Short Library – HD Cells – cells can accommodate 2 fins per cell height, 2p+n
    Mid-Height Library – HP Cells – cells can accommodate 3 fins per cell height, 3p+n
    Tall Library – UHP Cells – cells can accommodate 4 fins per cell height, 4p+n
    russell_john said:
    A pretty bold claim for a company that has struggled for years just to make 7nm work for them ......
    Reply
  • Endymio
    This paper outlines incredible interconnect densities of hundreds of thousands of connections per square millimeter and power consumption (measured in picojoules per bit - Pj/b)
    Pj/b is a measure of energy consumption per bit, not power.


    digitalgriffin said:
    No place on earth would be safe even in a limited war. Even if you could disregard nuclear winter...
    Nuclear winter is an entirely discredited theory.

    ...you would have to deal with likely dozens of nuclear power plants that likely melted down....
    And? All modern plants have multiple power backup facilities. Even if those were taken out (which a limited war would NOT do) the plants also have concrete containment sarcophagi. The results would be not like Chernobyl, but like Japan's Fukushima, an accident that caused zero deaths from acute radiation sickness. There were a total of 160 workers at Fukushima would receivedwhole-body doses of around 100 mSv, or around what the average person already receives every 15 years just from natural background sources.
    Reply