Intel has now listed the Core i3-10100F, a processor that wasn't part of the chipmaker's initial 10th Generation Comet Lake-S launch, on its ARK website. The chip still isn't on the company's master price list, but it's perfectly positioned to compete against AMD's Ryzen 3 3300X that has largely been absent from retail channels since its launch five months ago.
The Core i3-10100F is poised to be the new budget gaming champion. The 14nm Comet Lake chip arrives with four cores and eight threads clocked at 3.6 GHz and a boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz. With a 65W TDP (thermal power design), the quad-core part has relatively low cooling requirements, which is good news for budget builders.
As the "F" suffix in the model name indicates, the Core i3-10100F lacks integrated graphics. The processor won't miss it anyway since it's aimed at the gaming crowd that'll likely pair the chip with a discrete gaming graphics card. According to Intel, the Core i3-10100F will retail for between $79 and $97; however, the chipmaker doesn't state when the quad-core processor will hit the retail channels.
|Processors||Cores / Threads||Base / Boost Clocks (GHz)||L3 Cache (MB)||TDP (W)||MSRP|
|Core i3-10100F||4 / 8||3.6 / 4.3||6||65||$79 - $97|
|Ryzen 3 3300X||4 / 8||3.8 / 4.3||16||65||$120|
It's crystal clear that Intel's Core i3-10100F is gunning for the elusive Ryzen 3 3300X. AMD's chip, which is based on the Zen 2 microarchitecture and 7nm node, also has a four-core, eight-thread configuration. Compared to the Core i3-10100F, the Ryzen 3 3300X has a 200 MHz higher base clock and 10MB more L3 cache.
Like the Core i3-10100F, the Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics. The Zen 2 processor also competes in the 65W category, so it's the perfect opponent for the Core i3-10100F. AMD includes the Wraith Stealth CPU cooler with the Ryzen 3 3300X, while Intel probably delivers the Core i3-10100F with the same nameless stock heatsink the chipmaker has been using all these years.
While the Ryzen 3 3300X was available for a short period after launch, it has been out of stock pretty much everywhere for roughly five months. It remains to be seen whether the Core i3-10100F can match the Ryzen 3 3300X in gaming performance. If it does, Intel has a sure winner on its hands if the chipmaker can provide sufficient supply.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Zhiye Liu is a Freelance News Writer at Tom’s Hardware US. Although he loves everything that’s hardware, he has a soft spot for CPUs, GPUs, and RAM.
New Chinese GPGPU arrives to challenge Nvidia's AI dominance but falls woefully short - Loongson unveils LG200, up to 1 Tflops of performance per node
Yes, you can have too many CPU cores - Ampere's 192-core chips break ARM64 Linux kernel in two-socket systems, company requests higher core count support
Hmmmmm, AMD still hasn't announced lower end zen 3 processors, so... This might actually play a bit to Intel's advantage especially for those just getting into building a pc on a budgetReply
Interesting to see Intel have such a good offering on the low end. This is indeed a great opportunity for Intel to make more inroads to the under 100$ market. We'll have to wait and see what the low end of Zen 3 compares to this one.Reply
This may be intel's new niche for now; Today, Intel is the budget alternative to AMD. It is much cheaper for me today to build an intel setup with an i3-9100f vs an AMD Ryzen alternative. This new i3-10100f CPU will be the "go to" budget gaming chip considering it will even be cheaper than the Ryzen 3100.Reply
Also, although my main gaming rig is a Ryzen 3900x, I built a rig for someone recently with an i9-9900K cpu which I was able to pick up at Newegg for $379, coupled with an inexpensive Z390 motherboard and it nearly matched my rig in performance, yet was a couple hundred bucks cheaper overall. It's weird how the tides have turned but that's the reality I guess.
It's a sad day for Intel when they are fighting on the bottom end product stack instead of swinging for the top end stack where higher margins lie.Reply
What a good chip! For gaming on high this cpu will be a good match for 1080p gaming at a solid 60FPS.Reply
At that price sounds like a nice entry level chip for gaming/working. At least while the Ryzen 3 cpus are not around.Reply
It seems to be the same 10100 but without a iGPU, and if thats the case it barely match the Ryzen 3 3100 in some productity works and lose in most of them. Gaming wise seems to be basically the same, the only times it wins against 3300X is while using a Z490 mobo and DDR4 3200 RAM. (https://www.techspot.com/review/2033-intel-core-i3-10100/)
Im guessing intel cripple the new core i3 somehow, to avoid Core i7 7700K owners rage. Still at less than U$ 99 sounds like a nice deal.
In any case you could probably get a Ryzen 5 2600 + B450 mobo + DDR4 3200 memory for equal or less than a i3 10100 + Z490 mobo + DDR4 3200 memory.
You have to give Intel credit.Reply
They are highly experienced at 4 core 8 thread chips ...
Few sane people would put an i3 on a z490 motherboard, h470 would make a whole lot more sense. DDR4 pricing is more or less flat from 2133 through 3200, so I wouldn't call 3200MT/s RAM an expense over anything else and on platforms that don't allow memory clocks to go that high, timing margins can still be leveraged to tighten latencies.RodroX said:In any case you could probably get a Ryzen 5 2600 + B450 mobo + DDR4 3200 memory for equal or less than a i3 10100 + Z490 mobo + DDR4 3200 memory.
Uhh, no. This chip is $50 less than the $130 3300X. I think this author just made an (bad) assumption and posted an article as if their assumption were fact.Reply
This looks to me more like a dozen or so 14nm fab plant managers asked the question "What do we do with these 200,000 i3-10100's whos iGPU failed validation after that screw up last month?" and the answer was "Rebadge them to i3-10100F and knock $50 off the price."
A lot less dramatic but a lot more probable sequence of events.
derekullo said:You have to give Intel credit.
They are highly experienced at 4 core 8 thread chips ...
GN had a video about the RTX 2080 that said "We get it Nvidia. you can make a 1080ti." I feel the same way about this chip... "We get it Intel, you can make a 2600k"