Intel Announces Core i9-9900KS With $513 RCP, Arrives October 30 with 127W TDP (Updated)

71

Update 10/28/2019 12:08pm PT: Intel revealed the Core i9-9900KS will only be available until the end of the 2019 holiday season via a video posted to YouTube. 

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • logainofhades
    While lower than expected, I think it is still higher than what it is worth. The $184 ish difference, vs a 3700x, could easily mean a better GPU. That isn't even taking into account the more expensive cooling, that will be needed to tame this beast.
    Reply
  • Co BIY
    That is a good question for an article to answer.

    What are the coolers capable to handling this new processor at 127 TDP. Unfortunately I don't see coolers listed by TDP or handy charts that convert TDP to cooler capability.

    I actually don't see coolers put numbers to their cooling power at all. Seems like it would be pretty easy to say X BTUs per minute dispersed at 70 degrees (f) air temp.
    Reply
  • tom1111
    I have a Coolermaster Masterliquid 120 with 200W TDP.
    I have set my i9-9900K to 5GHz allcore Turbo and the Power Limit to 180/165W to keep the Temperature under control.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Intel revealed the Core i9-9900KS will only be available until the end of the 2019 holiday season via a video posted to YouTube.
    Since the KS is basically just a new stepping of the i9-9900K, I'm betting they'll just start selling them as i9-9900K's. I mean, when you have a new stepping of a chip, it's pretty nuts to keep making the older, worse one, since the manufacturing costs should be essentially the same.

    Initially, the newer-stepping K chips might be lower-binned KS that couldn't hit the clock speed targets, but I guess some cherries should eventually end up being sold as Ks.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Co BIY said:
    That is a good question for an article to answer.

    What are the coolers capable to handling this new processor at 127 TDP. Unfortunately I don't see coolers listed by TDP or handy charts that convert TDP to cooler capability.

    I actually don't see coolers put numbers to their cooling power at all. Seems like it would be pretty easy to say X BTUs per minute dispersed at 70 degrees (f) air temp.
    Well, the preview they already posted showed it going well above 127 W. So, for most users*, that number is a fiction.

    However, the question of which coolers are up to the task is still relevant.

    * note: some motherboards enforce the TDP more strictly, but gaming-oriented boards tend not to.
    Reply
  • Darkbreeze
    logainofhades said:
    While lower than expected, I think it is still higher than what it is worth. The $184 ish difference, vs a 3700x, could easily mean a better GPU. That isn't even taking into account the more expensive cooling, that will be needed to tame this beast.


    Plus, only a 1 year warranty? No thanks. They can keep their processor right there on the store shelf. Permanently.

    https://www.tweaktown.com/news/68448/intels-new-core-i9-9900ks-5ghz-1-year-warranty/index.html
    Reply
  • kinggremlin
    Darkbreeze said:
    Plus, only a 1 year warranty? No thanks. They can keep their processor right there on the store shelf. Permanently.

    https://www.tweaktown.com/news/68448/intels-new-core-i9-9900ks-5ghz-1-year-warranty/index.html

    I wouldn't worry about it. All indications are that this will be a very limited release, which will make the RCP meaningless. Retailers are going to jack the price up so high, that you wouldn't have bought one with a 10 year warranty. The limited release is most likely also the reason for the 1 year warranty. Intel isn't going to have any of these lying around in 3 years for replacements.
    Reply
  • Darkbreeze
    I wouldn't have bought one anyhow, but there have been plenty of limited releases before and they never had a one year warranty. Obviously, they don't have much faith in the longevity of those chips with an all core 5Ghz boost.
    Reply
  • TraderJim
    What a joke. Intel is turning into the Trump of the chip world. So few of these must be binning out that they are only putting out the news to entice enthusiasts to stick with the Intel platform, only to downgrade to a plain 9900k when they can’t get a hold of a 9900ks. Nice try, Intel. How the mighty have fallen. Good luck with the graphic card program. Nobody will believe anything you say after this de facto fake news.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Darkbreeze said:
    I wouldn't have bought one anyhow, but there have been plenty of limited releases before and they never had a one year warranty. Obviously, they don't have much faith in the longevity of those chips with an all core 5Ghz boost.
    For those who just fire up the occasional game, I think there's no cause for concern.

    I suspect the 1 year warranty is just so they're not on the hook if some turkey buys it for heavy compute jobs and runs it full-tilt, 24/7.

    For anyone considering an i9-9900K, I don't see why they wouldn't just step up to the KS, assuming they can actually find it for anywhere near list price.
    Reply