Exclusive: 'Nehalem' at 2.9GHz and X58

67

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
  • zipz0p
    Suddenly, my P35 chipset, Q9450 and DDR2 seem horribly inadequate.
    Reply
  • aznguy0028
    i feel the same way

    welcome to the world of technology.

    Reply
  • shadowthor
    lol, same.
    Reply
  • january = upgrade time for me

    new nehalem quad core 2.66 ghz then OC it =D

    ddr3 ram

    4870 X2... or the die shrink of gtx 200's...

    x58 mobo

    woohoo

    big step over my current core 2 duo e6420 @ 3.2 ghz, 8800 gts 640 and 2 gb of 800 mhz ram

    looking forward to it
    Reply
  • EZ guys, I wouldn't get too excited until we see some actual benchmarks. The article basically just said, "Hey guys, we have the new Intel CPU, which now includes all of the same features that AMD have had for the past 5 years, but we can't tell you how fast it is..."

    The fact that the NDA does not allow benchmarks makes me very skeptical of Nehalem's performance, what on earth is the point of sending samples to the media if they can't benchmark it? Is it normal to do this?
    Reply
  • dagger
    I thought Intel is going to put forward the 8 core/16 threads "extreme" edition Nehalem chip first, like they did for earlier generations. Good for us, I guess.
    Reply
  • JonathanDeane
    I so want one of these, but I will wait for the bugs to shake out and the chipset prices to come down a bit :)

    I wouldn't worry about the performance Intel has had years to watch AMD and look for ways to make it better... Hyperthreading on 4 cores thats gonna be fun.
    Reply
  • roofus
    Jay-DEZ guys, I wouldn't get too excited until we see some actual benchmarks. The article basically just said, "Hey guys, we have the new Intel CPU, which now includes all of the same features that AMD have had for the past 5 years, but we can't tell you how fast it is..."The fact that the NDA does not allow benchmarks makes me very skeptical of Nehalem's performance, what on earth is the point of sending samples to the media if they can't benchmark it? Is it normal to do this?Normally I would say exactly my friend. On another site they actually did do some benchmarks on this CPU with a crude board and netted in the neighborhood of 30-40% better performance than the current best offerings. Not sure about the motherboard but the CPU is for real.
    Reply
  • thomasxstewart
    Some GOOD Things, Affordable, with smallest at ~$379 & Bandwidth at 32 gb/s. This means most futuremark reference tests will approach 32,000, as basicly its bandwidth test. Which is 1/3 more than Todays Best.

    It is too bad rd8800 chipset coming ('9) from AMD is based upon two year old retail design, nvidia? 8800 gtx basicly moved to chipset,yet at least its based on TOP of Line from Way Back Then & thus Pre Ultimate, How Long Must We Wait? X58 is for Whoopper, yet same size 700 million transistors Desktop/workstation class CPU.

    Signed:PHYSICIAN THOMAS STEWART VON DRASHEK M.D.
    Reply
  • kman7607
    I am curious to see what effect the launch of the x58 and Nehalem will have on the prices of current procs and mobos. Hopefully they will drop enough to entice me into a build! I have heard opinions that the price drop will not be significant, but a guy can dream, right?
    Reply