Kingston and Adata Lead Retail SSD Market

Kingston IronKey Vault Privacy 80 External SSD
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)
Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Glock24
    I thought Samsung or Crucial would lead the charts, but sadly it's the makers of bottom of the barrel drives that are there.

    Kingston is know for bait and switch practices with their products, mostly SSDs and RAM. Some of their SSD models are decent but they make mostly garbage. The same goes for ADATA, they have like 500 different models and maybe a couple are decent ones.
    Reply
  • Yeah, I wouldn’t buy either of them. It’s because they’re cheap and that’s it. Sort of like the Yugo craze.
    Reply
  • Exploding PSU
    Weird, I'm not that up to date when it comes to SSD, almost clueless in fact.

    But everytime I ask someone who knows a thing or two about recent PC parts they always told me to avoid both Kingston and ADATA "like the plague".
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    In the lead, by some weird industry only ranking that no one else knows about.

    Both of those are on my DoNotBuyEver list.
    Reply
  • Colif
    Being cheapest doesn't make it the best - https://platinumdatarecovery.com/blog/which-ssd-brand-is-the-most-reliablehttps://www.backblaze.com/blog/ssd-edition-2021-drive-stats-review/
    I seem to see adata & crucial drives die more than others. Counter arguement, if they cheap you just buy another... answer to that is, how much is your data worth to you?
    Reply