Micron Announces QLC NAND SSDs Up To 7.68TB

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Paul Alcorn
Editor-in-Chief

Paul Alcorn is the Editor-in-Chief for Tom's Hardware US. He also writes news and reviews on CPUs, storage, and enterprise hardware.

  • thefattyzilla
    Now we know exactly why they just dumped a ton of their drives over the past 2 weeks. Picked up a 2TB SSD of theirs for $270 from Rakuten.
    https://slickdeals.net/f/11585371-2tb-micron-1100-2-5-sata-iii-solid-state-drive-269-free-shipping
    Reply
  • SoerenHedemand
    That's marketing speech. In real life, the binary ordering will be like this:
    0000
    0001
    0011
    0010
    0110
    0111
    0101
    0100
    1100
    1101
    1111
    1110
    1010
    1011
    1001
    1000
    The point is to only change one bit between neighboring analog levels.
    Reply
  • derekullo
    20990180 said:
    That's marketing speech. In real life, the binary ordering will be like this:
    0000
    0001
    0011
    0010
    0110
    0111
    0101
    0100
    1100
    1101
    1111
    1110
    1010
    1011
    1001
    1000
    The point is to only change one bit between neighboring analog levels.

    Marketing would have put the binary in numerical order.

    Or at least copy pasted it from the programmer who put it in numerical order.

    Reply
  • mapesdhs
    "That means standard 3.5" HDDs are also now in the crosshairs. "

    Tech sites have been saying this sort of thing for years now. Where's the reliability data for QLC tech? What about cost? Backup? etc. It's not as if rust spinner tech is standing still, likewise LTO and other developments.
    Reply
  • BryanFRitt
    "more importantly, they draw 3X less power, during read-centric workloads", so if a comparable HDD array draws _ power, these generate 2X_ power? P-3*P=-2*P, this doesn't sound right.
    Reply