Does Microsoft Hyperlapse Pro Actually Work? We Go Hands-On
Microsoft's Hyperlapse is built to make it easy to make first-person action videos, but how well does it really work? Let's find out.
When Microsoft announced Microsoft Hyperlapse, we were curious to see what it could do. The company boasted that it could take any first-person recorded action video and turn it into a comfortably watchable timelapse. We decided to give it a shot and see what it could do with a simple driving video.
The desktop version of the software uses all the image data to figure out the 3D space recorded, along with the dominant path traveled, and stitches together a "Hyperlapse." It also removes a bunch of still bits from the video, such as when you're taking a quick break or stuck at a traffic light.
To test it out, I grabbed a GoPro, mounted it upside-down to the rear-view mirror, and had it looking back while I went for a quick spin.
During the drive, I could see the camera was shaking around quite a bit, so I was curious to see the results of turning it into a simple timelapse, where the software would take every tenth frame or so.
When I got to my destination, I loaded the raw data into GoPro Studio, re-oriented it, and sped it up 8x before exporting it. Once exported, the video actually looked alright:
After that, I exported the full clip at normal speed so that I could import this into Microsoft Hyperlapse. Importing went off without a hitch.
Setting the right options in Hyperlapse was a snap. I selected that I used a GoPro Hero3+ Silver (because that information had been lost in the file data after exporting the video from GoPro Studio), selected the advanced algorithm, left the "speed up factor" slider at 8x, set the resolution to 720p at 60 FPS, and sent it to processing.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Processing is where the troubles began. The video would render up until about 76 percent, at which point it crashed. This happened time after time, and because the software had only been available for a couple of days, resorting to the forums for help was no use. Luckily, on my fourth try it managed to finish rendering successfully, which took well over two hours on a Core i7-4770k at stock clocks.
Below is the video processed by Microsoft Hyperlapse:
We'll let the results speak for themselves. We clearly see the camera trying to follow the dominant path, although it does have a delay and doesn't always seem to know what to look at. That may be due to the car's interior occupying a large portion of the view. What is nice is that it cuts out the long still bits, meaning you don't have to watch me grab a mint and tuck a cable out of sight.
However, the problem with this attempt was that the original video was actually quite good, leading me to wonder if I'd used Hyperlapse in the wrong conditions? I therefore did what any good Dutchman would do: I went for a bike ride. A bike ride let me mount the camera with a first-person view, and I intentionally biked around moving side-to-side excessively and found some wobbly roads to see how Hyperlapse would cope with very shaky video. Basically, I set out to make the worst source footage I could within 10 minutes. Below are both the videos, with the plain one up top.
Clearly, the original timelapse is unwatchable. Of course (take my word for it), the source video that runs at normal speed at 60 FPS is also hardly watchable due to the side-to-side movements. After letting Microsoft Hyperlapse have a go at it, though, it actually looks very good. Hyperlapse completely worked out the shakiness and erratic camera movement and created a nice, smooth timelapse. Granted, it moves around a bit, which makes it seem like I was a drunk cyclist, but that's a sacrifice I can accept.
Would we recommend Microsoft Hyperlapse? Well, that depends on the kind of video you're making. For the driving video, where it was mounted on a static place, it clearly doesn't really help. In fact, I'd say that it even ruins the video. However, if you feed Microsoft Hyperlapse some proper action video, it can certainly make something very watchable and even enjoyable out of it. Now, if only there was a free version of the software that doesn't leave a huge watermark...
You can download Microsoft Hyperlapse here, and it is available for Android, Windows Phone (select models), Microsoft Azure and Windows. We used the Microsoft Hyperlapse Pro version for these videos.
Follow Niels Broekhuijsen @NBroekhuijsen. Follow us @tomshardware, on Facebook and on Google+.
Niels Broekhuijsen is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He reviews cases, water cooling and pc builds.
Microsoft preparing Lunar Lake Surface and Surface Pro laptops for 1Q25, says report – new Surface Laptop Studio and an 11-inch Surface also on the horizon
Camouflage eSports monitors launched by JAPANNEXT – but you probably won't see them in stores
Zero-day Windows NTLM hash vulnerability gets patched by third-party — credentials can be hijacked by merely viewing a malicious file in File Explorer
-
Augustjohnson Great review. I've been testing this out as well and have found it to be pretty effective. I manufacture an entire line of mounts that let you wear your phone, so this app is a great compliment to those that use their smartphone for action video recording. The Action Mount let's you use any phone. Tom, you should try it out!Reply -
lun471k Loved the having access to the video samples. This might be perfect for my motorcycle trips timelapses.Reply -
damianrobertjones Any chance of a review of the Surface 3? Probably not as there's no Surface Pro 3 review either.Reply -
f-14 only problem i have with this review: "Basically, I set out to make the worst source footage I could within 10 minutes." expecting the best from the worst is shaky reviewing technique at best. do the same with every iDevice, mount it upside down and to your review mirror (the least stable viewing source of any automobile i can immediately think of other than the license plate bracket with two screws mounted in the bottom of the frame.) give us something to compare it to.Reply
nobody goes around trying to make the worst video, amateurs typically take the wrong equipment (any iDevice, because they think they can film starwars with their phones bwhahahahaaa) and try to make videos that always turn out like that.
so how much did apple pay for this advertisement and not to demonstrate their iDevices with this microsoft product? i'm guessing a 10% discount on an iPhone7 Gold when it comes out with some upc sized coupon. -
baracubra I've been waiting so long since they first started demoing this software for a consumer release! The amount of technology and innovation running in the background while this thing works its magic is phenomenal...I expected it to be a much heavier program, turns out it's just a little 14mb bit of software... Psyched to finally hyperlapse at homeReply -
alextheblue only problem i have with this review: "Basically, I set out to make the worst source footage I could within 10 minutes." expecting the best from the worst is shaky reviewing technique at best.
Man you clearly didn't read the whole article, or even skim it properly. When you feed it first person action video (which is what he did with the "worst case" source), then Microsoft's Hyperlapse WORKS! His videos demonstrate that it works great when used properly. He wasn't using an MS, Apple, or Android device anyway. It was a GoPro and a PC - but the important part is to watch the two bottom videos, and see how Hyperlapse kicks butt with first-person action video timelapses!