Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Will Cost $349, RTX Mobile is Here

Nvidia head Jensen Huang took the stage at a packed CES keynote briefing dedicated specifically to the company's gaming technology. He introduced the RTX 2060, the company's latest GPU and one capable of ray-tracing.  It will debut at $349 on January 15 with 52 trillion tensor FLOPs, 6 GB of G6 memory and 5 gigarays per second. He additionally announced G-Sync Ultimate, a new driver that will make adaptive sync monitors work like those that already have Nvidia's proprietary technology, as well as RTX cards for laptops.

Andrew E. Freedman
Senior Editor

Andrew E. Freedman is a senior editor at Tom's Hardware focusing on laptops, desktops and gaming. He also keeps up with the latest news. A lover of all things gaming and tech, his previous work has shown up in Tom's Guide, Laptop Mag, Kotaku, PCMag and Complex, among others. Follow him on Threads @FreedmanAE and BlueSky @andrewfreedman.net. You can send him tips on Signal: andrewfreedman.01

  • jamezz2018
    RTX2060 faster than the 1070 Ti? Nvidia could be onto a winner here...
    Reply
  • nexushg40417
    Say I already own one of the monitors that will be newly supported on Jan 15th for GSYNC. How do I get GSYNC on that monitor I already own?
    Reply
  • AlistairAB
    21652342 said:
    RTX2060 faster than the 1070 Ti? Nvidia could be onto a winner here...

    Not faster, the same speed. Ignore Wolfenstein 2 that is an outlier. Nvidia's own marketing material has it faster in about half the games and slower in the other half. One thing to keep in mind is that the 1070 ti was an incredible OC'er, so I expect the RTX 2060 to be slightly slower than the 1070 ti in general.
    Reply
  • s1mon7
    Nvidia announcing adaptive sync support was surely the highlight of the event. That was a great way to stay competitive for the people eyeing the upcoming Navi and Intel GPUs.

    The make it or break it will be whether the driver will work with all of the non "G sync certified" Freesync monitors as well as an AMD or Intel GPU would (the remaining 388 models that they tested). Those are the monitors that most people buy to have at their homes these days, and if Nvidia won't support them properly, they are still at a major disadvantage should AMD or Intel come up with a competitive GPU.

    I have an LG Freesync monitor and the only reason I'm not running an AMD GPU with is is because there aren't 4K-capable AMD GPUs out there. As soon as there is one, if Nvidia does not support it, I will switch to the GPU that allows me to use Freesync on my monitor that I already have and don't plan to switch from.
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    chances of getting free sync monitor to work with g-sync?

    also while nto a fan of RT #350 for a faster than 1070ti is a good deal.
    Reply
  • lifeboat
    "How do I get GSYNC on that monitor I already own?" You'll just have to upgrade to the latest drivers that will be released on the 15th.
    Reply
  • PuperHacker
    Well... If it is true that it will outperform a gtx1070ti and have ray tracing, why bother spending $150+ on an rtx2070? It makes no sense to have a performance gap this small... it is just like the gtx1070ti/gtx1080. Hope they don't force stock clocks on every rtx2060 so it doesn't match the rtx2070...
    Reply
  • feelinfroggy777
    21652380 said:
    Say I already own one of the monitors that will be newly supported on Jan 15th for GSYNC. How do I get GSYNC on that monitor I already own?

    Nvidia will release a driver update on the 15th that will open up support for your monitor.
    Reply
  • King_V
    21652527 said:
    Nvidia announcing adaptive sync support was surely the highlight of the event. That was a great way to stay competitive for the people eyeing the upcoming Navi and Intel GPUs.

    The make it or break it will be whether the driver will work with all of the non "G sync certified" Freesync monitors as well as an AMD or Intel GPU would (the remaining 388 models that they tested). Those are the monitors that most people buy to have at their homes these days, and if Nvidia won't support them properly, they are still at a major disadvantage should AMD or Intel come up with a competitive GPU.

    I have an LG Freesync monitor and the only reason I'm not running an AMD GPU with is is because there aren't 4K-capable AMD GPUs out there. As soon as there is one, if Nvidia does not support it, I will switch to the GPU that allows me to use Freesync on my monitor that I already have and don't plan to switch from.


    Yeah, see, my understanding is probably incomplete, but this is what had me confused.

    I thought Adaptive Sync was the general term for the two existing Adaptive Sync technologies - GSync, and FreeSync.

    Yet, in the article, it almost made it sound like a separate thing. So, when they say GSync will work with Adaptive Sync monitors that don't have GSync in them, do they mean it'll work with FreeSync monitors, or do they mean something else entirely.

    Are they basically saying that they're finally allowing FreeSync support? ie: what some people needed to hack their drivers to do (and Nvidia shut that down real quick), they're finally officially going to support? I'd like to think so, but, I'll admit I'm a bit lost on this.
    Reply
  • Sam Hain
    21652488 said:
    21652342 said:
    RTX2060 faster than the 1070 Ti? Nvidia could be onto a winner here...

    Not faster, the same speed. Ignore Wolfenstein 2 that is an outlier. Nvidia's own marketing material has it faster in about half the games and slower in the other half. One thing to keep in mind is that the 1070 ti was an incredible OC'er, so I expect the RTX 2060 to be slightly slower than the 1070 ti in general.

    Also consider this, once RT is enabled, cut those frames down on the RTX 2060 considerably, unless staying @ 1080p; fairs okay there and is of course title-dependent. The RTX 2060 is more or less a next-gen GPU equipped with technology it cannot properly exploit; underpowered. For that, one would realistically need the 2080/2080 Ti, keeping monitor(s) resolution in mind.
    Reply