Nvidia Details Volta GV100 GPU, Tesla V100 Accelerator

17

Nvidia pulled back part of the curtain to reveal its long-anticipated Volta GPU architecture, showing the GV100 GPU and the first derivative product, the Tesla V100, here at GTC in San Jose. Nvidia first dropped the Volta name at GTC in 2013, and it's taken the company four years to get to the juicy details. If you're a gamer, don't get too excited yet, though; Nvidia is still pitching Pascal-derived products (only a year old, or less) for you. If you work in the AI and high performance computer (HPC) markets, however, this first phase of Volta is coming your way.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Contributor

Derek Forrest was a contributing freelance writer for Tom's Hardware. He covered hardware news and reviews, focusing on gaming desktops and laptops.

  • bit_user
    The GV100 contains eight Tensor cores per SM, and each core delivers up to 120 TFLOPS
    That can't be right.

    Each tensor core generates 64 FMAs per clock, translating to 128 FLOPs. At 8 tensor cores per SM, you get 1024 FLOPs per SM, which works out to 1 TFLOPS @ 1 GHz. Now, if we assume it was 120 TFLOPS for the entire GPU, then that would yield a very reasonable clock speed of 1.43 GHz, assuming all 84 SMs were enabled, or 1.5 GHz assuming 80 SMs.

    That's awfully impressive. I'd bet we're not talking about IEEE 754-compliant floating point, here. They must've cut some things besides denormals to get that much speed up over their normal SIMD units.

    second generation of NVLink ... allows for up to 300 GB/s over six 25GB/s NVLinks per GPU.
    Because it's bidir, and they're counting each direction.
    Reply
  • Paul Alcorn
    19675100 said:
    each core delivers up to 120 TFLOPS
    That can't be right.

    Each tensor core generates 64 FMAs per clock, translating to 128 FLOPs. At 8 tensor cores per SM, you get 1024 FLOPs per SM, which works out to 1 TFLOPS @ 1 GHz. Now, if we assume it was 120 TFLOPS for the entire GPU, then that would yield a very reasonable clock speed of 1.43 GHz, assuming all 84 SMs were enabled.

    You're right, it's 120 peak Tensor core TFLOPs for the total card. With the caveat that Peak TFLOP/s rates are based on GPU Boost clock. Fixed :)

    Reply
  • bit_user
    19675148 said:
    ...
    Go Chiefs!
    (I used to live there.)
    Reply
  • bit_user
    BTW, it sounds like there are some interesting efficiency enhancements, in the form of sub-warp granularity scheduling. Anandtech hinted at this (pretty explicitly, I might add), but said that details would have to wait.

    I'm guessing there are probably specific synchronization points at which warps can get broken up & reconstituted. It's not going to be fully-independent scheduling of each lane, or else it'd no longer be "Single Instruction", with its attendant benefits.
    Reply
  • Hupiscratch
    But does it has RGB?
    Reply
  • redgarl
    So basically 15 TFLOP FP32... of course if you are putting many chips together that number will go up 15X8 = 120...

    Why not 15 X 1000 = 15 000 WOW.... cmon... seriously?
    Reply
  • JackNaylorPE
    19675649 said:
    But does it has RGB?

    Ahhh ... you beat me to it :0

    This comes on the back of a video i just watched entitled "if this is what the new iPhone, looks like, Samsung is in trouble". With the younger generations allegedly being "tech savvy", this obvious bent towards from over function proves that "tech savvy" assumption blatantly wrong. How about a smartphone for which I don't have to say "Let me call you back from a land-line" ? How about a phone that doesn't focus on form giving me the thickness of a slice of cheese and batterly life less than a day, and instead gives me a week of battery life, as my Treo 650 did more than 12 years ago ? Give it 3 months ... then the fad that says t says "I'm in the know, I'm not a bling bling guy" will be the total absence of RGB. I have watched me kids go thru ...

    I wanna see Britney Spears concert ... I would not be caught dead at a Britney Spears concert
    I gotta have an iPhone ... I gotta have anything but an iPhone
    Today, my kids and their peers have aged out of the fad thing (oldest approaching 30) but, those peers with younger siblings it's.... I gotta have bling bling up the gazoo .... mark my words :)

    Reply
  • bit_user
    19676419 said:
    So basically 15 TFLOP FP32... of course if you are putting many chips together that number will go up 15X8 = 120...
    That math only works by coincidence. The 120 TFLOPS number is derived according to my post, above. On a related note, the TPU uses fp16. Since they didn't quote another fp16 number, it might've replaced the double-rate fp16 support in P100.

    BTW, I was surprised not to see anything about int8 performance.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    19676737 said:
    With the younger generations allegedly being "tech savvy",
    Your "old man" is showing. Seriously, what does that have to do with this?

    And yes, I think significantly more kids in this generation are meaningfully tech-savvy than previous generations. I'd actually find it pretty intimidating if the majority were actually nerds like us.
    Reply
  • Stormfire962
    So how much is this card going to cost us consumers? A whopping $1,000 USD or a more reasonable price like $350 USD and will it be true to NVidia word which is not worth much today since they have lied to the customer in the passed! Frankly I am getting pretty damn tired of NVidia boasting a lot and not delivering on their so call promises. They told us SLI was the way of the future and that failed. They lied about the memory specs of the 900 series and got caught doing it. Now they are coming out with another so call super graphics card? I cannot help to wonder how long they had this sitting on their shelf holding off to release it just to sucker us consumers yet again.

    Sorry all for the nasty response. But I think NVidia has lost their focus on doing right by us consumers and are focusing more on making a quick buck and damn us all again.
    Reply