Q&A Session With AMD and Troublemakers Behind Opteron and FirePro 'Machete' Hardware

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Marcus Yam served as Tom's Hardware News Director during 2008-2014. He entered tech media in the late 90s and fondly remembers the days when an overclocked Celeron 300A and Voodoo2 SLI comprised a gaming rig with the ultimate street cred.
  • joytech22
    Sweeeeeet, so AMD's bang for buck is FINALLY sinking into the heads of film makers.
    Reply
  • stingstang
    I've been waiting for this movie since seeing the trailer in Grind House.
    Reply
  • elbert
    Troublemakers really is making a name for themselves. I wonder tho does some of this have to do with Robert Rodriguez, being part owner, has learned a bit more on when to use 3D rendering. In 1991 this company was founded under the name of Los Hooligans.
    Reply
  • chesterman
    nice, i like amd too, but i'm thinking this has turned into a fanboy news. in fact, it looks like a paid advertisement.
    Reply
  • Stifle
    Cheech and Steven Segal in the same movie.... This cannot fail
    Reply
  • furylicious
    I'm just glad that AMD is back in the whole arena of competition again and making a name for themselves. So, I don't mind news like this where big moviemakers are going with AMD. As long as there is competition, I can expect lower prices and better product. Can't wait to see that movie though, Steven Seagal is pure lulz.
    Reply
  • NotYetRated
    In terms of bang for your buck, AMD has been the choice for quite some time now. Though, raw performance wise, Intel is king. Hands down. I fail to see where it makes sense for a movie studio to use AMD processors. In applications like this, the amount you can get done in a day is normally constrained by how well your PC can keep up. Spending an extra 400 or 500 bucks may seem like a lot, but not when you get even 5% more efficiency while paying someone $40+ and hour. Simple economics. The smart studio would be using the fastest possible.
    Reply
  • RazberyBandit
    ^ No, a smart studio would maximize it's profit based on price vs. performance.
    Reply
  • L0tus
    The incredible developments in AMD platform technology continue to fuel my creativity...
    And the winner of the "most rehearsed line" is...

    it helps ensure driver quality and platform stability
    Are you effing kidding me right now?! ATi?! driver quality?! in the same sentence!? Just 2 days ago, Tom's released an article on nVidia's new offering showing how weak ATI drivers were.

    Red thumb me all you like...this is total BS...I know a paid advertisement when I see one.
    Reply
  • rhangman
    More "bang for your buck" = more servers/cores in the render farm, so faster speeds, not slower. If it was slower, then AMD wouldn't be "more bang for your buck".

    For the workstations Intel may be faster (no idea whether or not using a slower AMD processor would actually effect work output), but then you have to deal with supporting Intel and AMD rather than just AMD.
    Reply