Nvidia and AMD reportedly sharing 15% of their China GPU revenue in exchange for export licenses — 'unprecedented' export revenue sharing deal may have been struck

Nvidia H200 NVL PCIe GPU
(Image credit: Nvidia)

Both Nvidia and AMD have reportedly agreed to pay the U.S. government 15% of China-sourced revenues to unlock export licenses for previously restricted chips. Under the reported terms of the new deal, Nvidia will be able to resume H20 chip sales, and AMD will be able to sell its MI308 accelerators into China. The deal, not officially announced, has been reported independently by a multitude of outlets, including the BBC, FT, and Reuters. We also followed up with Nvidia for more details.

The restrictions on exports of such potent AI accelerators were originally put in place due to national security concerns, but the 15% levy marks a significant shift in that strategy. The revenue-share deal would represent a landmark foray into uncharted territory. Several news agencies, such as the BBC and FT, point out that a deal where commercial entities pay a revenue share in exchange for government export license approval is unprecedented.

It is understood that AMD’s licenses were also being inked ahead of the weekend. We don’t have any AMD statements about the new 15% revenue-sharing deal at the time of writing.

Nvidia statement to Tom's Hardware

Nvidia has been quite quick to trot out an official statement. This morning, an Nvidia spokesperson told Tom’s Hardware, “We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets.” Providing some context to the newly announced export license approval process, they added, “While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide.”

In addition, the statement repeated arguments in favor of relaxed cutting-edge technology export controls we have seen previously, “America cannot repeat 5G and lose telecommunication leadership. America’s AI tech stack can be the world’s standard if we race,” ended the short statement.

For Nvidia and AMD, perhaps this policy shift has come at a pivotal time. There have been signs of China-based competitors raising their competitiveness on several fronts.

Only yesterday, we reported on Chinese state media molding public opinion by characterizing Nvidia H20 GPUs as “neither environmentally friendly, nor advanced, nor safe.” The safety concerns seem to be a tit-for-tat response to Western powers, who cite similar concerns regarding Chinese-sourced semiconductors. and electronics. Nvidia has strenuously denied the existence of any kill switches, back doors, or spyware in its GPUs.

How much extra money will go to the U.S. treasury?

Reuters provided some interesting context to the new 15% deal between Nvidia, AMD, and the U.S. government. According to the latest financials, Nvidia raked in $17 billion in revenue during its latest financial year from China. AMD's China business scored $6.2 billion in revenue in 2024.

With the Green and Red team’s expensive AI chips now available for sale in China, we could expect both yearly revenue figures to increase impressively. However, 15% of the total combined $23.2 billion (latest combined figures) is less than $3.5 billion for the U.S. Treasury. Also, we must remember that the 15% deal only covers the advanced AI chips that require these export licenses. In other words, the 15% deal is ‘small potatoes’ to a country like the U.S., when judged purely on financial terms.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • pug_s
    Sounds like extortion to me.
    Reply
  • Itsahobby
    This self imposing tariff is not a tax, but a payout only? As trump said, tariffs are paid by the exporting countries. Nuts.
    Reply
  • King_V
    Sounds like a . . bribe?

    And the recipient of this 15% would be . . ??
    Reply
  • John Nemesh
    This is extortion. Flat out. ILLEGAL extortion, not that it matters when the extortionist owns the DOJ and FBI...
    Reply
  • TerryLaze
    15% of revenue even, not their income, that gotta hurt.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    Tariffs are import duties, while these are export duties. That's interesting. I wonder how common those are, throughout the world.

    I can think of some reasons to levy such duties, but the main argument I see in this case would just to make the hardware more expensive for Chinese customers. Perhaps that's seen as an added barrier that, when you stack it on top of limiting the specs of the hardware, would further hamper China's access to AI hardware?
    Reply
  • Charogne
    If I get it correctly, Trump is ok to trade US national security in exchange for money?
    Reply
  • JTWrenn
    Itsahobby said:
    This self imposing tariff is not a tax, but a payout only? As trump said, tariffs are paid by the exporting countries. Nuts.
    Sorry but it's a tax.

    "a compulsory contribution to state revenue, levied by the government on workers' income and business profits, or added to the cost of some goods, services, and transactions."

    Nvidia was forced to do this. They didn't volunteer a donation. It's also a targeted tax so that is even worse. This can't be done by the president it has to go through congress.

    All that said it is better than a tariff, but still a breaking of the separation of powers. We need to have a strong congress that splits up these powers so we don't have an autocracy simply because it has a lower, not zero, chance of breaking our system. Infighting helps so down the march of fascism.

    I think the whole thing is too late, and the unintended consequences of all of it keep rolling. China now doesn't trust there are not kill switches...or at least that is their line. They were forced to bring up their own chips, and they are good enough for them to get by without funding us. We shot ourselves in the foot every step of this.
    Reply
  • King_V
    Charogne said:
    If I get it correctly, Trump is ok to trade US national security in exchange for money?
    For money. For gaudy personal gifts. For flattery. The list goes on.
    Reply