RTX 4060 Ti 16GB Roughly 40% Faster Than 8GB at Higher Resolutions

Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
(Image credit: Nvidia)

The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB might be one of the least attractive GPUs due to its $500 price point, but according to a review by Daniel Owen, the GPU is substantially quicker than the $100 cheaper 8GB model in several modern games. In his review, Owen compared the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the 8GB model to see how much of a performance difference the extra VRAM capacity would provide. He found the RTX 4060 16GB provides roughly 40% extra performance in several modern 2023 titles at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. At 4K resolution, the additional VRAM is even more beneficial, giving the 16GB card twice the performance of the 8GB model (on average).

It's worth mentioning that the 4060 Ti 16GB's capacity is only advantageous in games that spill over 8GB of memory capacity. Nonetheless, Owen's review found that quite a few 2023 titles will take advantage of more than 8GB of memory.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • ezst036
    Not really a big shocker. 8 additional GB is quite a jump, it adds a lot of future-proofing. A new review similar to this one a year from now, but with games (more on the heavy side) that are coming soon should also be very useful.
    Reply
  • Sleepy_Hollowed
    It’s almost like a lot of people here but nvidia apologists mentioned this.

    It’s pathetic that a card comes with only 8 GB of RAM in 2023.
    Reply
  • TomaszTP
    The thing is that NVIDIA xx60 bracket is not exactly for the 4k resolution and hardly for 1440p cause realisticaly is the xx50 bracket GPU's
    Reply
  • ilukey77
    ezst036 said:
    Not really a big shocker. 8 additional GB is quite a jump, it adds a lot of future-proofing. A new review similar to this one a year from now, but with games (more on the heavy side) that are coming soon should also be very useful.
    still nerfed by the bus speed .. personally anyone looking for a lower tier card should keep a look out for the 7800xt and see what price and performance ..
    I have a feeling the 7800xt is going to be a far better card than the 4060 16gb !!
    And could also ( fingers crossed ) be cheaper or match the price of the 4060 16gb !!
    Reply
  • hotaru251
    Turns Out, DLSS 3 Frame Gen Consumes Extra VRAM

    ah yes lets focus on lowering the bus speed of a "mid" (more like entry in reality) gaming gpu, refuse to give it proper vram (on 8), and make dlss 3 frame gen a "recommended"feature but also it uses up some of that precious vram.

    more ppl dig into 4060 tier the more i think nvidia has lost their minds.
    Reply
  • ilukey77
    hotaru251 said:
    ah yes lets focus on lowering the bus speed of a "mid" (more like entry in reality) gaming gpu, refuse to give it proper vram (on 8), and make dlss 3 frame gen a "recommended"feature but also it uses up some of that precious vram.

    more ppl dig into 4060 tier the more i think nvidia has lost their minds.
    Nvidia hasnt lost their minds their doing what Nvidia does BEST screw their customers over by selling junk forcing people to upgrade to better GPU's to make them more and more money ..

    All the while riding off the GOOD WILL of ( i personally think idiots ) fanboys and the market share they have gained over the generations !!

    AMD has done some not so consumer friendly stuff as well so ( while i like AMD stuff ) im not totally blind to their BS either ..
    but AMD are gaining consumer trust ( even if they sometimes take 1 step forward 2 steps back at times )

    Intel are up and coming in the GPU sector and i believe with there level of support shown with the ARC GPU's they are in it to win..
    Reply
  • thisisaname
    ilukey77 said:
    Nvidia hasnt lost their minds their doing what Nvidia does BEST screw their customers over by selling junk forcing people to upgrade to better GPU's to make them more and more money ..

    All the while riding off the GOOD WILL of ( i personally think idiots ) fanboys and the market share they have gained over the generations !!

    AMD has done some not so consumer friendly stuff as well so ( while i like AMD stuff ) im not totally blind to their BS either ..
    but AMD are gaining consumer trust ( even if they sometimes take 1 step forward 2 steps back at times )

    Intel are up and coming in the GPU sector and i believe with there level of support shown with the ARC GPU's they are in it to win..
    Sadly AMD are learning all the wrong things from Nvidia, I hope I am wrong but it is looking that way to me.
    Reply
  • ilukey77
    thisisaname said:
    Sadly AMD are learning all the wrong things from Nvidia, I hope I am wrong but it is looking that way to me.
    I think they are doing better but the market dictates what happens ..
    7900xt was over priced at release BUT it was always leveled at the 4070ti /4080 12gb till Nvidia backed out of that due to massive hate ..
    AMD used that to upsell their 7900xtx so yeah a bit shifty ..

    As for pricing of the cards yeah in a perfect world AMD would have charged $200 usd less on all there cards BUT that has a positive and negative effect.. positive cheaper/ negative cheaper so whats wrong with them they need to price match with the competition !!

    the 7600 like anything 8gb is just plain disgusting for a GPU in 2023 ..

    But lets look at the positives the 7900xtx is cheaper and better ( excluding rt ) than the 4080
    the 7900xt is a better and NOW cheaper than the 4070ti

    the 7800xt should be aimed at the 4060 16gb.. if the price point is good then we have a 4060 16gb beater ..

    personally i believe the 4070 was released only to sell more 4070ti's

    The lower 4060s were released to upsell the 4060 16gb

    where as ( apart once again the 7600 ) the AMD line up has been on point ( AMD could have dropped the 7900xt price as soon as the 4070 ti released ) but they have matched / beat Nvidia at every turn ..

    they did NEED a 4090 competitor at release which cost them !!

    what AMD do in the cpu market is on them when Intel are behind in almost every sector ( AMD owns consoles , server soon to be apu's with strix point, handhelds are gaining market share ) when you have that clout AMD can do what they want like Nvidia does with there GPU market !!

    I liken it to Sony VS Xbox
    Sony have the better selling console better / more exclusives they will try to protect that lead at all costs by doing somewhat less than consumer friendly stuff !!
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    Now maybe TomsHardware should run a comparison test with the 16GB version against the results of the original 8GB version review instead of just writing what a Youtube person said.
    Reply
  • sitehostplus
    Sleepy_Hollowed said:
    It’s almost like a lot of people here but nvidia apologists mentioned this.

    It’s pathetic that a card comes with only 8 GB of RAM in 2023.
    Look, a $500 card with tons of vram will not perform nearly as well as a $800 card with the same amount of vram.

    Vram is nice, but you do need the gpu horsepower to go along with it or it's a waste IMHO.
    Reply