Winamp Petition Emerges as Microsoft Considers Purchase

24

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Kevin Parrish
Contributor

Kevin Parrish has over a decade of experience as a writer, editor, and product tester. His work focused on computer hardware, networking equipment, smartphones, tablets, gaming consoles, and other internet-connected devices. His work has appeared in Tom's Hardware, Tom's Guide, Maximum PC, Digital Trends, Android Authority, How-To Geek, Lifewire, and others.

  • back_by_demand
    If anyone were to buy it I would prefer MS, the Winamp tech would def improve WMP and SHOUTcast would be excellent as an integrated radio hopper - please buy it!
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    Oh jeez. No, please no.

    Just make it opensource already so we can have it improved and put all its great features into more open stuff!

    Cheers!
    Reply
  • It would be better if it went open source, but Microsoft is better than dying, I suppose. It would be awesome if Microsoft replaced WMP (which sucks) with Winamp, but that will never happen.
    Reply
  • p05esto
    I'm still using a version of WinAmp that's probably 8yrs old. It works perfectly and does everythign I need, I use it all the time. Why exactly can't I keep using this version? If the WinAmp company goes away it won't affect me for another 10 years maybe. What am I missing here? They built the perfect MP3 player and could have retired 10 yrs ago.... there's no reason to keep updating and adding crap that no one uses.
    Reply
  • giovanni86
    Now winamp being sold or going open source doesn't bug me at all, i would prefer the open source option. But the shoutcast streaming is my greatest concern since thats what i use winamp for. Other then that that is pretty much all i use winamp for is ShoutCast. If shoutcast go's away then no reason for me to have winamp to begin with. So i'm very concerned now.
    Reply
  • Northwestern
    Already signed it yesterday. I'd rather WinAmp become open source so a community that has better judgement and cooperation than a dying internet company can actually make it what it should have been a decade ago.
    Reply
  • coolitic
    Open-source is always better (well, almost always)
    Reply
  • Northwestern
    Already signed it yesterday. I'd rather WinAmp become open source so a community that has better judgement and cooperation than a dying internet company can actually make it what it should have been a decade ago.
    Reply
  • stratplaya
    With apps like Winamp I've always wondered, is there a point at which development should stop on the application? That perhaps the product is great as is and doesn't need more features so that it can do everything under the sun. Just fix bugs as they pop up and that's it.
    Reply
  • knowom
    I don't see why people care Foobar is all ready open source and does pretty much the same things Winamp does.
    Reply