Windows 7 to Reduce Energy Consumption

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Marcus Yam served as Tom's Hardware News Director during 2008-2014. He entered tech media in the late 90s and fondly remembers the days when an overclocked Celeron 300A and Voodoo2 SLI comprised a gaming rig with the ultimate street cred.
  • aspireonelover
    I'm sorry to say this, but windows 7 certainly didn't reduce my netbook's power consumption, but instead made my battery life shorter. What does this mean? it means it consumes more power.
    Many sites has done many tests to see if this "claim" was true. And after all, it wasn't true.
    In order to consume less power, the OS itself will need to use less system resources. That's the keypoint.
    Reply
  • jhansonxi
    Considering all the hype and hot air it probably has greatly contributed to global warming.
    Reply
  • krazynutz
    Perhaps this what's being fixed for the RTM version. Remember, what we're using is still beta.
    Reply
  • sdcaliceli
    I'm sorry to say this, but windows 7 certainly didn't reduce my netbook's power consumption, but instead made my battery life shorter. What does this mean? it means it consumes more power.
    Many sites has done many tests to see if this "claim" was true. And after all, it wasn't true.
    In order to consume less power, the OS itself will need to use less system resources. That's the keypoint.

    Considering that Win7 isn't finalized, nor are you using the recommended Win7 version on your netbook (i.e. Starter Edition)...
    Reply
  • duckmanx88
    aspireoneloverI'm sorry to say this, but windows 7 certainly didn't reduce my netbook's power consumption, but instead made my battery life shorter. What does this mean? it means it consumes more power.Many sites has done many tests to see if this "claim" was true. And after all, it wasn't true.In order to consume less power, the OS itself will need to use less system resources. That's the keypoint.
    maybe you should read that the win7 rc is by default the ultimate version and not the netbook version. TH just did an article about it last week.
    Reply
  • aspireonelover
    duckmanx88maybe you should read that the win7 rc is by default the ultimate version and not the netbook version. TH just did an article about it last week.Yeah, but this article "didn't" specify which version. It simply said Windows 7.
    sdcaliceliConsidering that Win7 isn't finalized, nor are you using the recommended Win7 version on your netbook (i.e. Starter Edition)...Starter Edition is the "included" OS in order to keep costs down. Not necessarily for netbooks. (If I read some articles right :P)
    Didn't expect to have thumbs down, cause it was my point of view.
    Reply
  • zodiacfml
    yes, if win7 power management had the sophistication of RM cpu clock utility.
    Reply
  • tipoo
    Good thing. Did anyone else see the battery life vs watt hours for laptops on Anandtech? Macs had double the ammount as Windows Laptops.
    Reply
  • WheelsOfConfusion
    Does this mean the Windows 7 scheduler will work properly with AMD's Phenom I chips with Cool 'n Quiet enabled, the way Vista didn't?
    Reply
  • TheZander
    I saw worse battery performance than Vista, XP, Linux and OSX with both the Beta and the RC (using a MBP) but I'm currently testing the RTM. We'll have to see how it does. So far, it doesn't seem too bad, but I need to do some more timed runs.
    Reply