5 new Intel Granite Rapids chips discovered with up to 128 cores, 500W TDP

Intel
(Image credit: Intel)

Five new Intel server processor SKUs have been discovered using Intel's upcoming Granite Rapids performance-oriented server architecture. X user Jaykihn released information on these new models, which feature up to 128 cores and 504MB of cache.

The models featured are the 6980P, 6979P, 6972P, 6952P, and the 6960P. The 6980P is the most powerful chip of the bunch, featuring 128 cores, a massive 500W TDP, a 2 GHz base frequency, and 504MB of cache. The runner-up is the 6979P, boasting the same 500W TDP rating and 504MB of cache but a slightly lower core count of 128 and a 2.1 GHz base frequency.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Aaron Klotz
Contributing Writer

Aaron Klotz is a contributing writer for Tom’s Hardware, covering news related to computer hardware such as CPUs, and graphics cards.

  • thestryker
    Granite Rapids will officially launch in Q3 this year with core counts of up to 86. The higher-end models with up to 128 cores will debut in early 2025.
    This is backwards see:
    Reply
  • vijosef
    504 Mb of cache is more than the minimum HD requirements for Windows Me
    Reply
  • Vanderlindemedia
    vijosef said:
    504 Mb of cache is more than the minimum HD requirements for Windows Me

    Its not one slab of 504MB, but little blocks and counted as a total.

    Some applications can use tons of cache, some don't benefit from it.
    Reply
  • Reality_checker
    Vanderlindemedia said:
    Its not one slab of 504MB, but little blocks and counted as a total.

    Some applications can use tons of cache, some don't benefit from it.

    So?
    Reply
  • ezst036
    Admin said:
    The 6980P is the most powerful chip of the bunch, featuring 128 cores, a massive 500W TDP, a 2 GHz base frequency, and 504MB of cache. The runner-up is the 6979P, boasting the same 500W TDP rating and 504MB of cache but a slightly lower core count of 128 and a 2.1 GHz base frequency.
    The table says 120 cores.
    Reply