Intel Core i9-14900KS alleged benchmarks leaked — up to 6.20 GHz and 410W power draw
Maximum performance at tremendous power.
Intel's alleged Core i9-14900KS processor has found its way into the OCCT benchmark database (as discovered by @BenchLeaks), which can be considered as a confirmation of its existence. The listed specifications correspond to what we learned about the purported CPU back in early January, but what we did not expect was the whopping maximum thermal power of the processor. This is still unofficial information and thus subject to change, but if accurate it appears Intel is going to extreme lengths for a minor boost in performance.
Intel's rumored Core i9-14900KS CPU is a cherry-picked Raptor Lake Refresh silicon with eight high-performance Raptor Cove cores, 16 energy-efficient Gracemont cores, and 68MB of cache. The only differences between this processor and Intel's current top-of-the-range Core i9-14900K are the frequencies and presumably power.
Clocks can reach as high as 6.20 GHz for single-core and dual-core turbo (which corroborates with rumored specifications of the product) as well as 5.90 GHz for three to eight core turbo. That's 200–300 MHz higher for the P-cores, with the E-cores topping out at 4.5 GHz — 100 MHz higher than the 14900K.
Those extreme clocks appear to come at a cost. The alleged Core i9-14900KS processor draws around 410W (as observed by @TechLevelUp), which is an enormous amount of heat to dissipate for a pseudo mainstream processor. In the past, only HEDT chips have flirted with such power use.
Of course, we're likely dealing with pre-production silicon here and production versions of the CPU may not have such an extreme maximum thermal power. Still, it's possible Intel's next cherry-picked silicon will consume and dissipate significantly more power than the regular Core i9-14900K because Intel 7 (aka 10nm Enhanced SuperFin) process technology can achieve only certain clocks without dramatically increasing power consumption.
The existence of Intel's Core i9-14900KS has not been officially confirmed. Intel's flagship Core i9 processors for desktops offer formidable out-of-box performance and the company should feel comfortable with its Core i9-14900K. However, there are always people who want to have something even faster, something that is special and rare.
To meet the demand from such customers Intel, began offering special edition KS processors in the recent years, beginning with the Core i9-9900KS and continuing with the Core i9-12900KS and Core i9-13900KS. To that end, chances that Intel is prepping Core i9-14900KS are fairly high.
Picking up enough Raptor Lake Refresh processors that can work at very high clocks should not be a problem as Intel produces a ton of those CPU die. However, if the power draw really is as high as suggested by these leaks, they'll require a formidable cooling system, and we can't help but wonder whether there be a lot of enthusiast willing to use them.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
peachpuff You can get 1500w space heaters for $20, intel is crazy if they think they can sell a measly 410w space heater...Reply -
Fus1996 Rest In Peace Intel....When you have to use that much power to prove your 'SPEED', it just goes to show how behind the times you really are...Improve your chip design like Apple and AMD to improve power efficiency and speed. People really need to stop buying into their eco-system..Reply -
vanadiel007 I don't trust leaking benchmarks. I will wait for a benchmark that works properly.Reply -
TerryLaze
You know they did it before yet you act as if you have no idea about them...Admin said:Intel's Core i9-14900KS shows up in the OCCT database, clocking at up to 6.20 GHz but with extreme power draw.
Intel Core i9-14900KS alleged benchmarks leaked — up to 6.20 GHz and 410W power draw : Read more
Look at the 13900k and the 13900ks they have the same max turbo power, it's the base power that gets increased to accommodate the higher clocks at normal workloads.
Power limits removed is a different thing and should be treated the same way as overclocking.
To meet the demand from such customers Intel, began offering special edition KS processors in the recent years, beginning with the Core i9-9900KS and continuing with the Core i9-12900KS and Core i9-13900KS. To that end, chances that Intel is prepping Core i9-14900KS are fairly high.
I don't know how Apple is doing but between intel and AMD intel has the much more efficient cores, even after a second "overclock" the 14900k at 6Ghz is still a good amount more efficient than the 7950x is at 5.7.Fus1996 said:Rest In Peace Intel....When you have to use that much power to prove your 'SPEED', it just goes to show how behind the times you really are...Improve your chip design like Apple and AMD to improve power efficiency and speed. People really need to stop buying into their eco-system..
And if someone really cares more about efficiency than performance the 13400 (4.6 Ghz) is almost 50% more efficient than AMD's best.
It's just the e-cores that are terrible at higher power plus the fact that everybody runs them overclocked out of their minds.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-14900k/22.html -
Notton
It'd be easier if Intel didn't have such a huge advantage with bundle pricing and chipset reliability.Fus1996 said:Rest In Peace Intel....When you have to use that much power to prove your 'SPEED', it just goes to show how behind the times you really are...Improve your chip design like Apple and AMD to improve power efficiency and speed. People really need to stop buying into their eco-system..
Intel is the best at WiFi/BT, LAN, USB/Thunderbolt, and their drivers. There really is no competition, especially when Intel offers discount pricing with their CPUs.
The only way you get to see Realtek, Mediatek, etc. parts on an Intel mobo/laptop, is if it's priced so low that you can't figure out if the OEM is making any money off of it. And even those tend to use older Intel WiFi/BT cards that were probably reused from scrap.
Where as AMD has a really awful RZ600 series WiFi/BT card. Their USB and chipset drivers work fine... until they don't and you'll never know if it was a bad driver or hardware design flaw.
If you want Intel WiFi/BT, LAN, and Thunderbolt on an AMD mobo/laptop, that's often more expensive than an Intel mobo/laptop with equivalent specs and features.
And then we have Apple...
who has you spending $1600 for 8GB of RAM...
in 2024....
and the SSD and RAM cannot be replaced... -
thestryker When I see something like this all I really want to know is what they're cooling it with if this is an accurate entry. It's pretty hard to cool that much on a desktop platform without exotic cooling, but that would generally lead to not hitting a thermal limit which the test shows it doing.Reply
As we've all known since ADL if you remove the power limits then the CPU will run as high as it can until it hits 100C so the "high" power consumption is an eyeroll. -
TerryLaze
Yup, it was with everything unlimited, also the base power is 150W exactly like the 13900ks so max turbo power will probably again be at 253W.thestryker said:As we've all known since ADL if you remove the power limits then the CPU will run as high as it can until it hits 100C so the "high" power consumption is an eyeroll.
https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-14900ks-cpu-leak-up-to-6-2-ghz-clock-100c-temps-400w-power/ -
peachpuff
Lol good effort of finding a graph that shows Intel's amazing efficiency 🤣 but no one's buying it.TerryLaze said:I don't know how Apple is doing but between intel and AMD intel has the much more efficient cores, even after a second "overclock" the 14900k at 6Ghz is still a good amount more efficient than the 7950x is at 5.7.
And if someone really cares more about efficiency than performance the 13400 (4.6 Ghz) is almost 50% more efficient than AMD's best.
It's just the e-cores that are terrible at higher power plus the fact that everybody runs them overclocked out of their minds.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-14900k/22.html -
Eximo Single thread, but yeah. It is there.Reply
AMD has the issue of the I/O chip. It requires power even if you are only doing a one core load so it skews things a bit. Intel has a similar problem with Meteor Lake now. Have to wait for desktop chips to see how that plays out.
i3-12100/13100 is amazingly efficient. Also get great efficiency out of the Ryzen 5600. Haven't seen anything with the 5600X3D on it yet, but you can see how well the 7800X3D is doing. Keeping the clock speed low is key. -
thestryker
Yeah I know I'm just tired of seeing everyone who cries over the power consumption when limits are removed acting like this is somehow a 400W+ CPU or the 13900K/14900K are 300W+ CPUs. When the power limits are in place they're within ~10W or so of said limit on even the heaviest of workloads.TerryLaze said:Yup, it was with everything unlimited, also the base power is 150W exactly like the 13900ks so max turbo power will probably again be at 253W.
https://wccftech.com/intel-core-i9-14900ks-cpu-leak-up-to-6-2-ghz-clock-100c-temps-400w-power/
Intel and AMD are both guilty of blowing up their efficiency curves for maximum performance. That's why the 13400 and 7800X3D are topping that chart, and the 13400 does well in multithreaded only trailing the regular 7900 and the 7800X3D/7950X3D. The common thread between all of these CPUs is that the clockspeed is kept under control.peachpuff said:Lol good effort of finding a graph that shows Intel's amazing efficiency 🤣 but no one's buying it.