Intel Core Ultra 200 Arrow Lake desktop CPU launch reportedly delayed to October 24
Previously, these CPUs were expected to arrive in early October.
Intel's Core Ultra 200 (codenamed Arrow Lake) series was previously rumored to launch on October 17. However, Hong Kong publication HKEPC claims that Intel has reportedly pushed the launch date to October 24.
The reasons for the supposed delay remain unknown, and HKEPC hasn't provided any explanations. Multiple retailers have already started listing Arrow Lake CPUs on their websites, signaling that the official announcement should be around the corner. We've already seen the Arrow Lake chips listed in Europe and Canada. While I don't know if the pricing is accurate, it doesn't look out of line either.
According to various retailer listings, Arrow Lake should be priced similarly to or slightly more expensive than Intel's Raptor Lake Refresh lineup. Arrow Lake requires a new platform, so many consumers will need to purchase a new motherboard. On a positive note, the previous generation of Intel chips will likely see price reductions, which could be a valid option if you don't want to hop on Intel's Arrow Lake platform.
Overall, it's unlikely that a slight delay in CPUs that don't even have an official street date yet will cause Intel a significant blow. However, it does show that its throne as market leader may not be as stable as some think, and that makes even tiny delays to Intel's flagship products more notable than they would be otherwise.
Arrow Lake will need to prove competitive with Ryzen 9000 CPUs as the year ends and wishlists get filled out— although leaked Arrow Lake benchmark results don't reflect a giant Intel win around the corner. Some lost faith in Intel due to the current 13th and 14th Generation instability issues. Although Intel has already confirmed that Arrow Lake isn't affected by the same problem thanks to a new architecture, you can't help but think that Team Blue has probably lost some followers to Team Red.
AMD also has the advantage as the Ryzen 9000 chips have been launched for a few months and are readily available. Intel, on the other hand, will unleash the Core Ultra 200K SKUs, saving the budget options for later. Consumers who have their eyes on an Arrow Lake part that isn't included in the initial trio (Core Ultra 9 285K, Core Ultra 7 265K, Core Ultra 5 245K) must wait a few more months.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Christopher Harper has been a successful freelance tech writer specializing in PC hardware and gaming since 2015, and ghostwrote for various B2B clients in High School before that. Outside of work, Christopher is best known to friends and rivals as an active competitive player in various eSports (particularly fighting games and arena shooters) and a purveyor of music ranging from Jimi Hendrix to Killer Mike to the Sonic Adventure 2 soundtrack.
-
TheSecondPower Lunar Lake and Meteor Lake each had a "launch" date and a later release date which was announced on the "launch" date. Which Arrow Lake date was delayed, the launch date or the release date?Reply -
bit_user
It was rumored to be October 10th.thestryker said:Can you delay something that hasn't been officially announced?
I think these dates would have been communicated to their partners, even if still preliminary. All such partners would be under NDA. -
thestryker
Sure, but without there being a public release date nothing else matters. Missing what amounts to as an internal date is pretty irrelevant.bit_user said:It was rumored to be October 10th.
I think these dates would have been communicated to their partners, even if still preliminary. All such partners would be under NDA. -
dalek1234 Chris, you called Intel "market leader". 😂 Yes, they are leading in losing more money and market share each quarter.Reply -
bit_user
I doubt Intel's partners would be happy about the delay, not least system builders and the retail channel. Then again, AMD had their own delays, so ...<shrug/>?thestryker said:Sure, but without there being a public release date nothing else matters. Missing what amounts to as an internal date is pretty irrelevant.
You say it's irrelevant, but if they indeed hit last-minute delays of ~2 weeks, that's troubling. It's bad for AMD to do that, but even worse for Intel (being bigger and having gone through these motions even more times). I wonder if we'll get any insights into the reasons for it. I'm still wondering about that 20A-cancellation news. -
jp7189 Let me engage in pure speculation... perhaps Intel is having trouble building their usual pre-launch stockpile. They are using TSMC this gen and have less control of the manufacturing, and TSMC is under enormous pressure to remanufacture the defective Nvidia chips. Nvidia being a long time partner and not a competitor might sway TSMC in to pushing Intel's order back a bit.Reply -
rluker5 I think this article is here just to feed the trading algorithms with a couple of associated words in the title.Reply
It isn't news but speculation from comparing a newer rumor to an older rumor.
A similar title would be "RDNA 3 loses 1/3 of it's performance" based on rumors compared to earlier rumors. You could also substitute Zen 5 for RDNA3 in that statement. -
TheHerald
They are the leaders in market share and sales. They are not the leaders in the vast vocal minority of the internet that bashes intel for personal reasons unrelated to their actual products.dalek1234 said:Chris, you called Intel "market leader". 😂 Yes, they are leading in losing more money and market share each quarter.