'[The] Majority of gamers are still playing at 1080p and have no use for more than 8GB of memory': AMD justifies RX 9060 XT's 8GB of VRAM
Do you buy an 8GB GPU to play at 1080p, or do you play at 1080p because you have an 8GB GPU?

AMD's latest RX 9060 XT GPUs continue the saga of bifurcating mainstream options into different memory configurations for market segmentation. According to AMD's Frank Azor, the 8GB flavor of the RX 9060 XT is designed to cater to the needs of the majority of gamers, who play at 1080p.
Gamers and developers have long bemoaned constrained memory capacities with modern GPUs. Even at 1080p, many demanding AAA titles can overwhelm 8GB GPUs, as confirmed by professional testing with cards like the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB. Despite sufficient raw horsepower, the constrained framebuffer often forces you to compromise on graphical fidelity or even resolution for a playable framerate. Nvidia's RTX 5060 GPUs have been at the epicenter of this criticism, to the point where an older RTX 3060 12GB can outperform them in certain scenarios.
There were rumors that AMD might scrap the 8GB model, following the backlash faced by Nvidia. This proved to be inaccurate, as the product was likely too far in the pipeline to be axed. While the GPUs are still almost two weeks away from launch, enthusiasts have already begun raising concerns about the viability of the 8GB model. AMD's Chief Architect of Gaming Solutions and Gaming Marketing, Frank Azor, stepped in to justify their rationale, stating these GPUs target the "majority of gamers," who play at 1080p.
Majority of gamers are still playing at 1080p and have no use for more than 8GB of memory. Most played games WW are mostly esports games. We wouldn't build it if there wasn't a market for it. If 8GB isn't right for you then there's 16GB. Same GPU, no compromise, just memory…May 22, 2025
Based on the Steam Hardware Survey, this statement is largely accurate, as 1080p dominates with 55.27% of the market, followed by 1440p at 19.90%. Some would question: Does AMD's product segmentation actively restrict more users to 1080p? Do you buy an 8GB GPU to play at 1080p, or do you play at 1080p because you have an 8GB GPU? The RTX 3070 Ti perfectly illustrates how a small framebuffer can handicap an otherwise capable GPU. The GB206 core powering the RTX 5060 Ti is, in fact, faster than the 3070 Ti, but how much of that potential power will never be realized due to insufficient memory allocation?
It wouldn't surprise me if most of these models are earmarked for gaming cafes, where esports dominate and VRAM demands are low. However, the RX 9060 XT 8GB is quite awkwardly positioned as its raw power likely outstrips its VRAM capacity. An RX 9060 non-XT / RX 9050 8GB positioned in the $200-$250 range would've been a more suitable offering as an esports-only card. After all, the RX 9060 8GB is believed to be the successor to the RX 7600 8GB, which cost $269 at launch.
It will be interesting to see if AMD and board partners can manage to keep these GPUs at MSRP. The RX 9070 family hasn't been the best indicator in this regard. We'll have to wait until June 5th next month to find out.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
ezst036 Would there be any reason why one of the 3rd party vendors couldn't just go do 16GB with a 9060 GPU chip because they feel like doing it?Reply -
alceryes
If the AiBs bought an 8GB model they are probably contractually obligated to NOT put more VRAM on. Otherwise, all the AiBs could just buy the cheaper 8GB version and throw 16GBs on it.ezst036 said:Would there be any reason why one of the 3rd party vendors couldn't just go do 16GB with a 9060 GPU chip because they feel like doing it?
Yes, I know they are just buying the core chip, but they must stick with the RAM config they bought. -
Heat_Fan89 A little disingenuous AMD? Maybe you should be asking, do you buy an 8GB card because prices for a mid-tier card requires insane money when the product now costs 2x3 more and are hard to find. I bumped up against 8GB in MSFS 2024 in 1080P where I got a "running out of VRAM.Reply -
Alvar "Miles" Udell If 8gb were sufficient "for the majority of gamers who play at 1080p", then a 16gb variant wouldn't exist now would it?Reply -
Neilbob This would be fine if it wasn't demonstrated where there are instances of some modern games that, even at 1920x1080, struggle with 8Gb or downgrade things like textures in order to compensate.Reply
Not any games I play because I no longer care, which brings us to the only justification I think is warranted: 8Gb would be sufficient if that price was knocked down by (at least) 50%. -
hotaru251 Yeah no.Reply
AMD called Nvidia out ages ago for having 6GB vram....they cant try and act like 8GB is enough atm.
games use a ton of vram now even at 1080p. (thank you unoptimized caring devs) & thats ignoring if you run multiple things that sue GPU's vram...and heaven forbid you want to use "ai".
the price of 8gb vram is so small compared to benefit of having it when you need it. -
Amdlova I think they need make Open driver To old operational systems...Reply
A rx9600 8gb for a windows XP / windows 7 will be nice.
Have tons of games with not work in these new modern OS -
ingtar33
actually take those green glasses off.Heat_Fan89 said:A little disingenuous AMD? Maybe you should be asking, do you buy an 8GB card because prices for a mid-tier card requires insane money when the product now costs 2x3 more and are hard to find. I bumped up against 8GB in MSFS 2024 in 1080P where I got a "running out of VRAM.
AMD is being up front and clear on this. they are marketing the card at 1080p. they are not marketing it at 4k or 2k gaming.
NVIDIA is the company pushing 8gb cards and claiming they are 4k gaming cards.
while it's fair to be disapointed in the vram on these cards, or to question their decision to use 8gb of vram... or to even question the pricepoint, none of that makes it "disingenuous", just questionable design and pricepoint.
I think they're overpriced for an 8gb 1080p card. period. but that doesn't make me think AMD is being disingenuous. they're not marketing this as a 4k product. they're telling you what it is for, and while overpriced, i don't think they're lying about anything here. -
Mattzun Seems like cope.Reply
If you are playing e-sports at 1080p on a normal monitor, modern integrated graphics or an ancient 580 or 2060 are good enough.
If you want to drive a fancy 480hz monitor, you'll be getting at least a 9070
Still not sure why AMD didn't just make a single 192 bit 12GB card and crush NVidia at the low end -
Notton IMO, you are using the steam survey wrong.Reply
You need to look at the top played games.
CS2, Dota2, PUBG:B, Rust, Marvel Rivals, Apex Legends, Helldivers 2, GTA5, LoL, Rocket League, etc.
Of those games, the only one to run into issues with 8GB VRAM is Marvel Rivals.