Tiny Corp decides to make both AMD and Nvidia versions of its TinyBox AI server - GeForce version is 67% more expensive

TinyBox development
(Image credit: Tiny Corp)

Tiny Corp appears to have come to a firm decision about whether it will follow its original plan of using AMD GPUs or switch to Nvidia GPUs to power its Tiny Box server. The muddled answer is that it will make both. However, the price for this compact AI-accelerating server packing six GPUs will vary hugely depending on your choice: "red for $15k and green for $25k."

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Mark Tyson
News Editor

Mark Tyson is a news editor at Tom's Hardware. He enjoys covering the full breadth of PC tech; from business and semiconductor design to products approaching the edge of reason.

  • artk2219
    Looks like someone didn't complete a feasibility test before shoving their foot in their mouth.
    Reply
  • PEnns
    "...and at the time of our initial report had received 583 preorder"

    As if we need further proof that "pre-ordering" is a very dumb idea.

    People are worried this TinyBox thing will be sold out and they will suffer some kind of technological harm??
    Reply
  • Alvar "Miles" Udell
    If you like to tinker and feel pain, buy red. If you want it just works buy team green.

    Basically describes my experience with Team Red (9600XT to Fury Nano) and Team Green (2070 Super). AMD needs to heavily invest in software QC so it "just works".
    Reply
  • peachpuff
    artk2219 said:
    Looks like someone didn't complete a feasibility test before shoving their foot in their mouth.
    Oops...

    Reply
  • Notton
    Hotz boxes that no one wants to touch, and you definitely don't want to be holding them when the music stops.

    They are the Hotz Potato
    Reply
  • usertests
    Man freaks out publicly, gets more free press for his tiny company.
    Reply
  • digitalgriffin
    Even if they ironed out all the flaws, the man is obviously a disaster to work with. Won't touch his products with a 10 foot pole. A fix for one means a fix for all. And building a competing box is just as easy. And likely with less headaches.
    Reply
  • artk2219
    Alvar Miles Udell said:
    Basically describes my experience with Team Red (9600XT to Fury Nano) and Team Green (2070 Super). AMD needs to heavily invest in software QC so it "just works".
    The man is trying to use the cards in a way that they weren't designed and tested for, and is surprised and angry that his consumer cards aren't running his professional workload as well as he would like, and he isn't getting bespoke professional level support on consumer level equipment. Almost like thats why professional products with better support exist, or heck, why AMD's entire semi-custom group exists.
    Reply
  • ivan_vy
    artk2219 said:
    The man is trying to use the cards in a way that they weren't designed and tested for, and is surprised and angry that his consumer cards aren't running his professional workload as well as he would like, and he isn't getting bespoke professional level support on consumer level equipment. Almost like thats why professional products with better support exist, or heck, why AMD's entire semi-custom group exists.
    you are on point. Mr. Hotz wanted tu put a race car motor in a tractor to plow the field, at the end of the day is just about horsepower, right? right? /s
    and asked AMD to compete with themselves, MI-300 exists for a reason.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    If I were a Nvidia reseller, I'd be screaming for Nvidia to enforce their EULA and send Tiny a notice that they will not be receiving any shipments of RTX 4090 cards.
    https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/nvidia-updates-geforce-eula-to-prohibit-data-center-use/
    He should have to use workstation or datacenter cards, as far as I understand. That would probably push the price of his Nvidia boxes to well above twice that of his AMD model.
    Reply