Parallel Processing, Part 1: CPU Cores

Single, Dual Or Quad Core?

But what about four and more workers per processor? In this case, there might not always be enough work to saturate four or more units. It can also be tricky to distribute the workloads to the workers, meaning that the physical interfaces - such as HyperTransport (AMD) or the Front Side Bus (Intel) - might become a bottleneck in certain scenarios. As a third option, the mechanism that distributes the workloads, which is the operating system’s dispatcher, may also become a bottleneck.

AMD’s transition from single core to dual core processors was almost seamless, as the company had not maxed out thermal limits like Intel’s Pentium 4 processors. Hence, the Athlon 64 X2 was expensive but reasonable, while the Pentium D 800 series became extremely hot. Intel’s 65 nm processors, and the Core 2 processor family in particular, turned the tables. Intel has also been able to combine two Core 2 Duo processors Compare Prices on Intel Core 2 Duo Processors in a single processor package where AMD still hasn’t, which is better known as the Core 2 Quad today. AMD has promised to deliver its Phenom X4 processor before the end of this year.

In this article, we’ll have a look at a Core 2 Duo configuration running a quad core, a dual core and a single core, and compare how the extra cores scale. Is it worth going for a quad core today?

Join our discussion on this topic

Patrick Schmid
Editor-in-Chief (2005-2006)

Patrick Schmid was the editor-in-chief for Tom's Hardware from 2005 to 2006. He wrote numerous articles on a wide range of hardware topics, including storage, CPUs, and system builds.