Page 1:The Radeon's GCN Is Updated Again: The Tonga GPU
Page 2:Asus Strix Radeon R9 285
Page 3:Gigabyte R9 285 WindForce OC
Page 4:Test Setup and Benchmark Suite
Page 5:Synthetic Benchmark Results
Page 6:Titanfall and Battlefield 4 Results
Page 7:Thief and Arma 3 Results
Page 8:Grid Autosport and Assassin's Creed IV Results
Page 9:Watch Dogs and Far Cry 3 Results
Page 10:Idle Power Consumption Results
Page 11:Gaming Power Consumption Results
Page 12:GPGPU Power Consumption Results
Page 13:Temperature and Noise Results
Page 14:Radeon R9 285 Holds its Own at $250
Test Setup and Benchmark Suite
Power Consumption Measurement Methodology
Tom’s Hardware Germany’s test system for the exact measurement of graphics cards’, CPUs’, and other components’ power consumption was developed in cooperation with HAMEG (Rohde & Schwarz). It was designed for particularly precise measurements with very small time intervals and has a temporal resolution of up to 1 ms.
Only sophisticated technology is able to handle the challenges presented by AMD’s PowerTune and Nvidia’s Boost technologies. These generate changes in core voltage in time frames of under 10 ms, which results in very large and quick voltage fluctuations. Let’s take a look at what can happen in the space of only one single millisecond, using measurement intervals of 10 μs.
This is why we’re evaluating all measured currents and voltages with a 500 MHz four-channel oscilloscope with a data logger, the HAMEG HMO3054, and extremely fast current probes. This setup also allows for unified data storage and remote control.
The measurements provided by the three high-resolution DC current probes, all HAMEG HZO50s, are taken via a riser card for the 3.3 V and 12 V rails, which we constructed specifically for this purpose. It supports PCIe 3.0 and uses short signal paths. The remaining probes are connected to the PCIe power cable that we modified for this.
We measure the voltages directly at their respective rails. We’re now working with a temporal resolution of 1 ms, since this allows us to record and evaluate the fluctuations caused by AMD’s PowerTune and Nvidia’s Boost technologies with confidence.
We’ve limited the measurement duration to 1 minute due to the very high volume of data when we measure all channels. We only shorten the measurement intervals all the way to the minimum that the physical capabilities of our setup allows for our more detailed measurements.
|Test Methodology||No Contact Current Measurement at All Rails|
Direct Voltage Measurement
IR Real-Time Monitoring
|Test Equipment||1 x HAMEG HMO3054, 500 MHz Four-Channel Oscilloscope with Data Logger|
4 x HAMEG HZO50 Current Probe
4 x HAMEG HZ355 (10:1 Probe, 500 MHz)
1 x HAMEG HMC8012 DSO with Data Logger
1 x Optris PI450 80 Hz Infrared Camera + PI Connect
|Test System||Intel Core i7-5960X|
MSI X99 Gaming 7
16GB G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 2666 (4 x 4GB)
Samsung 850 EVO 512 GB
Raijintek Water Cooling
be quiet! Dark Power Pro 1200W
Microcool Banchetto 101
Benchmarking Hardware And Software
The Radeon R9 285 was tested with the 14.8 beta launch driver, but all other AMD cards were outfitted with the Catalyst 14.7 RC1 for testing. The GeForce cards used the newest option, which at the time of testing was the 340.52 WHQL driver.
We selected a variety of newer game titles with high detail settings at a resolution of 1920x1080 in order to give the Radeon R9 285 and its competitors a solid, real-world workload that this class of card should be able to handle.
The Asus Radeon R9 285's core clock was dropped to the 918 MHz reference specification in order to show what a typical Radeon R9 285 should be able to accomplish. Keep in mind that there is no reference cooler for this card, so all Radeon R9 285 will be unique in this respect.
Some readers will note that the Radeon R9 280 results are those we collected from our Sapphire Dual-X Radeon R9 280 review. Sapphire's card comes with a 940 MHz core clock, a mere 7 MHz over the reference specification. We took a few benchmarks with the reference clock but quickly realized that the results are within the margin of error, so we're using the Sapphire numbers to represent reference Radeon R9 280 results. Keep in mind that there is no reference Radeon R9 280 cooler, either.
Two of the games we're testing have an option to use a Mantle code path, so we're running those benchmarks (Thief and Battlefield 4) with Mantle enabled and disabled to measure the API's impact.
Graphics cards like the Radeon R9 280 require a substantial amount of power, so XFX sent us its PRO850W 80 PLUS Bronze-certified power supply. This modular PSU employs a single +12 V rail rated for 70 A. XFX claims continuous (not peak) output of up to 850 W at 50 degrees Celsius.
We've almost exclusively eliminated mechanical disks in the lab, preferring solid-state storage for alleviating I/O-related bottlenecks. Samsung sent all of our labs 256 GB 840 Pros, so we standardize on these exceptional SSDs.
|CPU||Intel Core i7-3960X (Sandy Bridge-E), 3.3 GHz, Six Cores, LGA 2011, 15 MB Shared L3 Cache, Hyper-Threading enabled.|
|Motherboard||ASRock X79 Extreme9 (LGA 2011) Chipset: Intel X79 Express|
|Networking||On-Board Gigabit LAN controller|
|Memory||Corsair Vengeance LP PC3-16000, 4 x 4 GB, 1600 MT/s, CL 8-8-8-24-2T|
|Graphics||Asus Strix Radeon R9 285|
954 MHz GPU, 2 GB GDDR5 at 1375 MHz (5500 MT/s)
(underclocked GPU to reference 918 MHz specification for benchmarks)
AMD Radeon R9 280X
850/100 MHz GPU, 3 GB GDDR5 at 1500 MHz (6000 MT/s)
Sapphire Dual-X R9 280 OC
850/940 MHz GPU, 3 GB GDDR5 at 1250 MHz (5000 MT/s)
AMD Radeon R9 270X
1050 MHz GPU, 2 GB GDDR5 at 1400 MHz (5600 MT/s)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
980/1033 MHz GPU, 2 GB GDDR5 at 1502 MHz (5008 MT/s)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760
980/1033 MHz GPU, 2 GB GDDR5 at 1502 MHz (5008 MT/s)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
1046/1085 MHz GPU, 2 GB GDDR5 at 1752 MHz (7008 MT/s)
|SSD||Samsung 840 Pro, 256 GB SSD, SATA 6Gb/s|
|Power||XFX PRO850W, ATX12V, EPS12V|
|Software and Drivers|
|Operating System||Microsoft Windows 8 Pro x64|
|Graphics Drivers||Radeon R9 285: AMD Catalyst 14.8 beta|
All other Radeon cards: AMD Catalyst14.7 RC 1
All GeForce Cards: Nvidia 340.52 WHQL
|Watch Dogs||Version 1.04.497, Custom THG Benchmark, 90-sec FRAPS, Driving|
|Arma 3||V. 22.214.171.1249, 30-sec. Fraps "Infantry Showcase"|
|Battlefield 4||Version 126.96.36.19925, Custom THG Benchmark, 90-Sec|
|Assassin's Creed IV: Black Flag||Custom THG Benchmark, 40-Sec|
|Thief||Version 188.8.131.52, Built-in Benchmark|
|Titanfall||Version 184.108.40.206, Demeter Map, Custom THG Benchmark|
|Grid Autosport||Version 220.127.116.1172, Built-In benchmark|
|Far Cry 3||Version 1.05, Custom THG Benchmark, 55-sec FRAPS|
- The Radeon's GCN Is Updated Again: The Tonga GPU
- Asus Strix Radeon R9 285
- Gigabyte R9 285 WindForce OC
- Test Setup and Benchmark Suite
- Synthetic Benchmark Results
- Titanfall and Battlefield 4 Results
- Thief and Arma 3 Results
- Grid Autosport and Assassin's Creed IV Results
- Watch Dogs and Far Cry 3 Results
- Idle Power Consumption Results
- Gaming Power Consumption Results
- GPGPU Power Consumption Results
- Temperature and Noise Results
- Radeon R9 285 Holds its Own at $250