Do Virus Scanners Slow Down Your System?
Does the presence of a virus scanner guarantee reduced performance, or does it have a negligible impact? We test 10 different products to see if you’re unknowingly suffering with security software.
File Access Benchmarks
The following benchmarks involve hard drive and file access, which a virus scanner could theoretically affect.
The results are close across the board with our first file access benchmark, the PCMark hard drive test score. It has been our experience that PCMark results have a larger margin of error than what we’d prefer, so we won’t draw any specific conclusions from this close result.
Moving to a real-world benchmark that involves compressing 334 MB of files, our WinRAR test doesn’t expose any obvious weaknesses in file system performance.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: File Access Benchmarks
Prev Page CPU And Game Benchmarks Next Page General Use Benchmarks-
iam2thecrowe before i read the article, my guess is Norton is the slowest and most useless....Reply -
well from my point of view - antivirus scanner do application loading to take a much longer time and this was proven by your tests.Reply
I think that AV software has no place into todays operating systems except for inexperincied users. I'm investing money to fast SSD disc to improve performace, why the hell intstall AV software to push performance back? -
micr0be talk about heavy modifications on the new set of AVs compared to the older ones ... my surprise is norton which i was expecting to cripple the system to a halt .... very nice article btwReply -
The test rig's CPU looks funny to me.Reply
Athlon II X4 645
3.5 GHz, Quad-Core, 6 MB L3 Cache
Isn't that a Phenom?